[PDF]1 - Rackcdn.comfc95d419f4478b3b6e5f-3f71d0fe2b653c4f00f32175760e96e7.r87.cf1.rackcdn.com/...
0 downloads
149 Views
8MB Size
MR. RYDER Reference: Your minute of 16 Ma John Pilger's piece was disgraceful. It was drawn to our attention immediately by BIS New York. Efforts are being made through BIS New York to get influential people to write to the New York Times repudiating it. I have seen one published so far. In addition, I am raising the whole issue of Pilger writing such ludicrous stuff with Johnny Apple, the New York Times' Chief Correspondent in London. Personally, I think anybody who gives Pilger space is potentially lending themselves to a campaign and I am astounded that the New York Times has fallen for it. That will be the gist of my message to Mr. Apple. Paymaster General is also involved in this exercise.
V B. INGHAM 20
May,
1980
The
• MR INGHAM
This article is now old hat, and I hoPe that I am hardened enough to take the sort of criticism offered by John Pilger. But I wonder, in view of the still large numbers of people employed at BIS and indeed in our Embassy in Washington, whether anyone arranged for a letter to be written to the New York Times repudiating the rather extraordinary conclusions of Mr Pilger, one of which was a thin implication, alleging the Prime Minister's views had somethinu in common with Nazism. This view becomes apparent in Mr Pilger's last paragraph.
410
Richard Ryder 16th May 1980
•
RESTRICTED
Foreign and Commonwealth
Office
London SW1A 2AH Telephone 01-
Your reference
S Wright Esq BIS New York
Our reference Date
12
May
PGN/301/8 1980
THE PILGER ARTICLE 1. Andrew Alexander of the Daily Mail has declined to alter his article to a letter. As a result it has been decided that we should take the following action: Bernard Ingham, Chief Press Officer at No 10, will write to the New York Times London correspondent to register HMG's displeasure that while giving publicity to Pilger's tendentious piece, they have not given the right of reply other than in letter form. You in BIS New York should get suitably important or influential businessmen (or others) to write to the New York Times expressing their displeasure. It would be better if their letters were published, but even if they are not something will be achieved. May I leave you to follow this one up? 2. We are always pleased to receive the copies of article3about Britain from the American press which you send us. While we may not make direct use of most of them, they are still worth having and I would like you to keep up the service.
M G Dougal Overseas Information Department cc R Prescott (Mr Maude4
sq Office)
N Gaffif Esq No 19 wning Street
RESTRICTED
• 10 DOWNING STREET From the Press Secretary
MR. PRESCOTT Many thanks for your letter of May 7 on the New York Times. I gather that Neville in discussion with you has suggested that a number of additional letters should be organised. I certainly agree with that. I am, however, pretty furious with BIS New York. It is acutely embarrassing to organise a journalist to write an article for the New York Times only to discover, when it has been written, that the New York Times has a positive and exclusive policy against replies on its COo-alpage. I feel like telling them that this has caused us embarrassment. In the meantime, I think I shall take issue with Johnny Apple, their resident correspondent in London, making known our extreme concern that they should give Pilger space and deny other more objective contributors the csame opportunity.
h1LA/ B. INGHAM 9 May,
1980
•:_r\6x, r\t7._ , PRIVY WHITEHALL,
COUNCIL LONDON
OFFICE SWIA 2AT
(
7 May 1980 Bernard Ingham Esq Press Secretary 10 Downing Street SW1
'
1\
)
NEW YORK TIMES: PILGER ARTICLE
•
I conveyed the gist of our conversation last Friday to Heather Harrison in the Overseas Department of She subsequently telephoned BIS New York the FCO. and made your point of view known in no uncertain terms. The response from BIS New York is given in the attached telegram. This is not in the least helpful from our point of view, the only good point being that someone has already responded in the letters page in the New York Times - copy telegram also attached. Do you think we can take this matter further, bearing I do not think Andrew Alexander in mind the delay? would welcome having to do a rewrite, and the letters column hardly carries the same weight as the Op-Ed page. 7
c R E S PRESCOTT Private Secretary
• YFO/1 6/05
CIE C .AtYIVi,s1:i
CO F CO OR
gli
19VA
UNCLASSIFIED FROt,, BIS
NEWYGRK W515r7.
TC, MEDIATE T;A.F6RAM
FuLLOONG
MAY 60
F C C
NUMBER INIAP
26 OF 5 MAY
FOR ALLAN OID.
NvkwYORK- T1MLS:
PILGER
ARTICLE.
ARTICLF .1 HAVE URGED MR ALIXANDER'S HLOr, LEAVIN'GHER IN NO DOUBT AS TO TH 1.
ON THf. FDITOR ;TLfcTH
OF THE Or-Lo
OP FEELhi;_,
tr ICL:i[c
uiA. f JOHN P1LGCR'S PIECE, BUT THE PAPER'S RULITr; tK,OLUTFIY rr-4-ct o. 1"!!' TI L!:lAt r'hiNTINGREF4'TTALSON THE OP-F5 Pt(iE 1111:f LrITI:T6 ^. GIVEN THIS, I HAVE ALSO TISCUS3FD WITH 1111TO A PFTTTAL COIDEPATION WILLING TO GIVE FAVOU'RAiftF '1OLLO1-,E MUCH 11. W7I1 W3P111?, P1AS LETTER FORV FROM MR ALEXANDER, wHICH COULD ThAr I HAVF ASWPFD •1W1 'AA'n),
410
MIN
(PRESENT rAxIminv
ARTICLE
1.Vr
c0( FUCH LFTTFR WOULD BE EXCLUSIVE TO THF, 1, IF MR ALEXANDER WILL REDRAFT I";Lirnift
PIFJ! TilrX Tr". r,1117;TI IN'fl!-T:', v 1.,TO ',VOIrl TrPS EDITOR EMPHASISES THAT Ei1.71) Ii LI"( Tru-Orr ALPFDY Pm' PRINTrIP (°:FRFAITTAL FROM LONF,ON ItAJP
.NYFCO 005/0? 00 FCC,
Neto5
CR 470 uNcLAS3I rIED P4 BIS NEW YORK 0215107 TO ImYLDIATE FCC)
MAY 8o
TELEGRAM iUrsiBER INDEp P5 OF P mAY mY TELEGRAM NvBER
24 OF 30 APRIL.
NEW YORWTImES' OF ? mAY PUBLISHES A LETTER TO THE EDITOR FROM DOUGLAS CRITCHLEY,
LONDON, TEXT FOLLOWS. ,
BEGINS, JOHN PILGER'S APRIL 18 OP-ED ARTICLE ON c,,ARGARETTHATCHER IS RUBBISH, EVEN IF HE HAD !-;AD HIS FACTS SIGHT, HIS EMOTIVE LANGUAGE WOULD STILL HAVE CREATED AN uTTERLY FALSE PICTURE, mi? PILGER SAyS„ "IN 1977-78 LESS THAN DOLLARS 8,8 MILLION ILLEGALLY CLAIMED IN SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS,"
WAS
IT WOULDHAVE
BEEN TRuER TO SAY THAT ILLEGAL CLAWS MR mORE THAN DOLLARS 6.7 HILLION WERL uNcOvErED, moo( woRC SHCH CLAWS can BE PRE. SumED TO HAVE GONE UNDETECTED, THE ARTICLE WAS FuLL oF SUCH NSTORTIONS, In REFERRING TO THE MOR 1ALITY RATE FOR MINERS,1R PILGER DOES NOT mENTION THAT, BECAuSE THE INDUSTRY IS CONTRACTING, THE AvERAGE AGE IS HIGH, THIS
1$ IN
NO WAy THE FAHLT OF mRS THATCHER. IT IS TRUE THAT BRITISH HOSPITALS ARE SHORT OF mONEY, WHEREARE THEY NOT? MRS THATCHER IS CUTTING GOVERNmENTEXPENDITURE BELOW THAT • PLANNED BY THE PREVIOUS LABOR GOVER,WENT BECAUSE THAT EXPENDITURE COULD ONLY HAVE BEEN HET BY A STRONG EXPANSION OF THE MONEY SupFLY, AND INFLATION WAS ALREADY RISING, MPS THATCHER'S INTENTION IS TO CET THAT INFLATION DOWN, mANy BRITONS THINK THAT HER POLICIES THAN THOSE OF "THE
ARE MORE' LIKELY TO SUCCEED
SESPECTED CAmBRICGE ECONOMIC POLICY REVIEw
GROUP," wHICH HAVE ALREADY BEEN TRIED AND FAILED, AS DID TED. HEATH'S ATTEmPT TO "RUN FOR GROWTH" EY INFLATING,' WHETHEROR NOT H-to
•
.T •
atezt-n—
HER POLICIES SUCCEED IN CREATING GROWTH, SHE HAS TO PERSIST WITH THEm-TOP TkiE TIME BEING TO REVERSE THE INFLATIONARY SPIRAL. CHANGE.IS NEVER POPULAR, AND MRS THATCHER'S POLICIES HAVE NOT ALWAYS BEEN AS SENSIBLY IMPLEMENTEE AS SHE WOULD HAVE WISHED, IT IS TO BE HOPED THAT SHE WILL NOW EE AS VIGOROUS AT THE EXECUTIVE LEVEL AS SHE HAS BEEN AT THE POLICY LEVEL. SURELY IT IS UNFAIR TO CRITICIS FOR NOT HAVING CURED ALL OF A NATION'S AILING ECONOMY A LONE MON IN NINE MONTHS OF AUTHORITY. TO CRITICIZE HER IN A FOREIGN NEWSPAPER, WHOSE READERS ARE LESS LIKELY TO BE ABLE TO SEE THE DISTORTIONS OF THE TRUTH, IS COWARDLY. ENDS HALL
NNNN
• C.Ak 44"1 ;lis."1 --A. emi tolovi°
10 DOWNING
s'aulx.„1
STREET
Prprcoi-
fl-ert
it
ikt
PlitA caxtau (kt.
1 441,..k. C
•
27 tA4
0~31.4'14
frce ekZ
rkst vt. tva‘A AA.AvAN
Cc,iiksA
c
QAUQ
-
)Xitst.)
c k-frtsye-
1.14„‘
IA^
2.144
ct.
r-
RESTRICTED
GR 300 RESTRICTED FP-BIS
NEW YORK 182129Z
TO PRIORITY
APR 80
FCO
TELEGRAM NUmBER 9 OF 18 APRIL INFO PRIORITY
WASHINGTON
FOLLOWING FOR NEWS DEPARTMENT PILGER 1.
ARTICLE
MIFT
IN NEw YORK TIMES.
(NOT REFEATED To
PAGE OF TODAY'S
MIRROR.
ATTACK ON THE SOCIAL UNQUOTE,
IN
PILGER'S
PARALLEL
IN
BRITAIN'S
2.
IS
TExT
OF ARTICLE
BY JOHN PILGER,
CN Op-ED
DESCRIBED
AS A IS AN EXTREME AND IMPASSIONED AND ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF QUOTE THATCHERISm VtE QUOTE A POLITICAL INIQUITY WITHOUT
wR1TER FOR THE DAILY
-
WASHINGTON)
NEW yORK TIMES
IT
POST-WAR HISTORY uNQuOTE.
A POSSIBLE
COUNTER WOULD BE TO REBUT ANY FACTUAL ERRORS IN PILBUT THAT mEANS FIGHTING ON GROUND OF P1LGER'S . _ CHOOSING AND, EvEN IF ERRORS Exl ST, CORRECTED Fl GuRES m I GHT NOT BE IMPRESSIVE, AND WOULD LEAVE RILGER'S GENERAL THRUST UNCHALLENGED. A BETTER APPROACH IN my VIEW WOULD BE TO INVITE A CONSERVATIVE GER'S
STATISTICS,
JOURNALIST,
OR A CONSERVATIVE
ING THE ECONOMIC
IMPERATIVES
mp,
TO ARGUE THE CONTRARY VIEW
OF QUOTE THATCHERISN
DEFEND-
UNQUOTE WHILE
REBUTTING
CHARGES OF SoCIAL CALLOUSNESS. THIS WOULD BE A MORE EFFECTIVE COUNTER THAN A NECESSARILY BALANCED OFFICIAL RESPONSE, AND wOULD BE mORE ATTRACTIVE JOURNALISM. AN 800-WoRD ARTICLE 'XULD BE IDEAL.
3,
As FIRST
AUTHOR.
STEP GRATEFUL
TO KNOW IF
YOUR AGREE,
WE WOULD THEN SEEK THE PAPER'S
ON THE Op-ED_PAGE. A SHORTER VERSION
IF
NOT FORTHCCmING,
AS A LETTER
Rr-c-qm!r--i-rr)
AN
TO PUBLI SH-
WE WOULD RECOmmEND SENDING
TO THE EDITOR.
HALL F ILES NEN-LS
AND CAN FIND
pRIOR-AGREEmENT,
GPS1300 UNCLASSI Fl ED APR 80
NEW YORK 182130Z
FROM BIS
F C 0
TO PRIORITY
10 OF 18 APRIL
TELEGRAM NLNBER
FOLLOWING FOR NEWS DEPARTMENT
1.
IS TEXT
FOLLOWING
IN NEW YORK TIMES
ARTICLE
PILGER
P T:
M I
OF ARTICLE.
BEGINS DURING LONDON - WE HAVE ENTERED A DARK PERIOD IN BRITAIN, ARE WHICH mANY OF THE PRECIOUS GAINS OF OUR MODERN CIVILIZATION OF HUmAN TRAGEDY THAT ARE THE DIRECT
STORIES
EARING
BOTH MADE REDUNDANT FROm THEIR
ImPOVERI SHED PARENTS,
MOST CELEBRATED
NOW COmmON. SURGEONS AT ONE OF BRITAINS'S HOSPITALS,
FATIENTS
ARE BEGINNING
SAID
MEANS,"
THE FABRIC
INDUSTRIES
INIQUITyA;WITHOuT
PARALLEL
I
TARTY OR GROUP AND THAT
POLITIC
I
DELky
IN THE UNITED SOCIALISm
ENTERPRI SE EXCLAM THATCHER,
wERE THAT
PROPORTIONATELY OUR "WELFARE
BELONG TO No POLITICAL
THAT THE POLITICAL
TOOK ROOT IN OuR BODY
DURING THE TIME TwO VINTAGE
BRITAIN
THATCHER
LABOUR
OF
MYTHS CHERISHED
WAS BECOMING A PIT
wOULD BRING
OF
BACK ROBUST FREE
wHAT ARRANT NONSENSE EXCLAm EVEN BEFORE MRS.
I RELAND,
ONLY
I
YEARS OF HAROLD WILSON'S
ADMINISTRATION.
STATES
THAT
SHARE THE BELIEF
UNCHECKED,
AND THAT MRS.
TO A POLITICAL
POSTWAR HISTORY.
IN BRITAIN'S
DURING THE DELUSIONARY
GOVERNMENT AND SPREAD, JAMES CALLAGHAN'S
IN mY VIEW,
AS THATCHERISm
NOW IDENTIFIED
HAS ENTERED OUR
AND TO THE PROSPECTS OF BRITAIN'S
AMOUNTS,
SHOULD SAY WITHOUT-FURTHER
INFECTION
DIE."
wHAT- THATCHERI Sm HAS DONE TO
Sm. "
SOCIETY
OF BRITISH
AND WHO WILL
A NEw "ISm"
"THATCHERI
WEALTH-PRODUCING
LIVE
MARGARET THATCHER CAME TO POWER AS
IN THAT TImE,
EVERYDAY LANGUAGE:
IT
"WHAT
THAT DUE TO A STARVATION
"IS
A CANCER SPECIALIST,
PRIME MINISTER.
OUT OF DESPERATION,
OF wORLD WAR I.
HOSPITALS
NEARLY A YEAR SINCE
IS
IT
USED,
TO THAT
FIELD
wE MUST NOW CHOOSE WHO WILL
OF FuNDS.
BECAUSE
SuCH AS HEART pACEmAKERS.
EQUIPMENT
THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY ARE NOW OPERATING
SYSTEM SIMILAR
IN THE OVERFLOWING
LONDON, ANNOUNCE THAT THE I R
PERHAPS IN THE HUNDREDS,
TO,DIE,
THE mOST BASIC
DOCTORS AT HOSPITALS A TRIAGE
'COLLEGE. IN
KING'S
TEACHING
IS
SUCH SUFFERING
COULD NOT AFFORD TO PAY THE BILLS.
THEY ARE DENIED
IN
BOARD CUT OFF THE- POWER IN THEIR
THE STATE ELECTRICITY HOME. THEIR
DIE
BECAUSE THEY HAD TO USE CANDLES AFTER
WAS STARTED
THAT
THREE CHILDREN
OF SuNDERLAND,
IN THE NORTHERN CITY
,OBS,
RESULT
DECISIONS.
OF POLITICAL A FIRE
PRESS CARRIES
ALMOST EVERY DAY NOW, THE BRITHIS
BEING VANDALIZED.
AMONG OUR EUROPEAN PARTNERS,
LESS ON SOCI AL SERVICES
STATE "
THAN BRITAIN.
WAS ALWAYS PART DREAM,
SPENT INDEED,
PART FRA I L REALIT/. •
/tOuR
OUR RICH qcH
vERE ALLOwED
OF mesT
OF THE Pont
TO GPOw PROPORTIONATELY
OTHER.wESTERN ATION
NATIONS,
OwNS 61
SO THAT TODAY A MERE TENTH
PERCENT OF THE NATIONAL
THOSE VI SI TORS FROM THE uN I TED STATES BY THE LOW LEVEL TO LIVE. 1972,
THE COAL MINERS ‘kORKFORCE REmAIND
OF THEIR
CLASS,
HOLDING
REASONABLY PRICED
OF OuR PEOPLE TRY
wERE FORCED TO STRIKE DOCILE
THE POVERTY LINE
WITHIN wITH
IN
THE CONFINES
ACCESS TO
FOOD AND CLOTHING
AND LOW RENTS. SADLY, AND LACK OF GREED AMONG ORDINARY
THE TOLERANCE AND GENTLENESS BRITONS
wEALTH.
WHO I NOUI PE ARE SHOCKED
OF WAGES ON WHICH MILLIONS
UP UNTIL
BRITAIN'S
RICHER THAN THE
MADE THEM TOO EASY TO EXPLOIT.
THATCHERISm,
AS REPRESENTED
GREW up MOSTLY
COLLEGE AND THAT ANy cABINET IN HIS
BY A CABINET
IN THE RIDtCULOUS
BOASTS mORE INHERITED
SINCE
1e22,
WHOSE LEADING
TOp HATS AND TAILS
MEMBERS
OF ETON
PERSONAL WEALTH THAN
IS NOW DELIVERING
THE COUP DE GRACE.
RECENT BUDGET,THE
CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER,
SIR
GEOFFREY HOWE, CuT TRAINING
PROGRAMS FOR THE uNEmpLOYED,
SLUM—
CLEARANCE PROGRAmS AND FuNDS TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH AND SAFETY BRITISH WORKING CONDITIONS ALREADY ARE AMONG
OF PEOPLE AT wORK. THE DIRTIEST,DAmpEST HELPS TO EXPLAIN
AND UNHEALTHIEST
TOOL OPERATORS,
UNLIKE LEAST
TO 1,650
"mODERATE"
IN THEORY,
AT
MINCESS
1E7,020, HAS
BRITA IN:
1.1
THE THATCHERITES
BECAUSE,
WILL
ENSURE THE
TO ONE OF THE WORLD'S
OUT OF THE PUBLIC MILLION.
PRINCESS
PERCENT,
EXPLAINS
HAVE LAUNCHED AN I S TO CONVINCE
LNEMPLOYED ARE DEFRAUDING
PURSE, ANNE'S
BUCKINGHAM
UNTAXED
PRESENT.
PALACE,
THE NATION SECURITY
THE UNLOVED
COUNTRy ESTATE AT THE SAmE TIME,
"ANTI-ScROUNGE11"
THE SOCIAL
A TAX—
TO APPROXIMATELY
ON THE MAGNI FICENT
GAVE HER As A wEDDING
THE OBJECT OF WHICH
CAMPAIGN
ROYALTY.
I S TO GO UP 30
"OVERSPENT"
THAT THE tUEEEN
ON WHICH THE POOREST CHILDREN
AND MEASURES THAT
HE GAVE,
OF DOLLARS
PERSONAL ALLOWANCE DOLLARS
"NECESSARY"
AND AMOUNT TO A FRONTAL ASSAULT GEOgFREY PUBLICLY SHORED UP THE
SIR IN
FAMILIES,
FREE INCREASE
ON THE EDGES
OF TEACHERS,
OF PRI VI LEGE
wEALTHIEST
OF LIFE
ANNOUNCED PETTY
OF SCHOOL MILK,
Cri STATE EDUCATION, ApEx
THE QUALITY
HAVING
OFTEN DEPEND FOR NUTRITION, WHOLESALE SACKING
THE THATCHERI TES ARE ABDONDONING WORLD wAR II HAS AIMED, AT
SINCE
IMPROVING
SOCIETY.
IN THE PRICE
PER 10o,000.
TORIES,
—PARTY CONSENSUS THAT
OF OUR INDUSTRIAL RISES
wHICH
RATE FOR mINERS, MACHINE— ° LABORERS AND OTHER WORKING PEOPLE
BUILDING
RANGES FROM ABOUT 900 AN ALL
IN EUROPE,
WHY THE MORTALITY
CAMPA I GN,
THAT mANy OF THE SYSTEM.
THE
ITSELF
I S FRAUDULENT. IN 1977-78, LESS THAN DOLLARS 8.8 MILLION WAS ILLEGALLY CLAIMED IN SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS, COMPARED WITH AppoxImATELY DOLLARS 748 MILLION IN LEGAL BENEFITS THAT ARE NOT CLA I MED EVERY THE MONETA RI ST ECONOMIC THE SI MPLI ST I C OBSERVATIONS 'BELIEF
IN AN
"UN FA I R"
YEAR. POLI CIES
OF THATCHERI Sm ARE BASED ON 0 = PROF. MI LTON FRIEDMAN WHOSE
o•ORLD I S EMBRACED, BY MRS.
TI-ATCHER.
1
50
_ NAVE HELPED 'TO DOUBLE INFLATION IN ONE YEAR, TO ANNUAL RATE OF 19.1 PERCENT, AND HAVE RETRENCHED MUCH OF OUR INDUSTRY TO THE POINT WHERE , IN THE vIEW OF THE RESPECTED CAMBRIDGE ECONOMIC POLICY REVIEW GROUP, muCH OF BRITAIN COULD BE AN INDUSTRIAL WASTELAND BY 1984. FREE ENTERPRISE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ITi WITH CASH RIGIDLY CONTROLLED AND DEMAND FORCIBLY DEPRESSED, HUNDREDS OF SmALL ENTERP RISING BUSINESSES ARE GOING BANKRUPT, WILE MAJOR BANKS ANNOUNCE RECORD CASH SO FAR,
THESE POLICIES
.
PROFITS
OF MORE THAN DOLLARS 2.2 BILLION. IS, NO LONGER POVERTY IN BRITAIN, " DECLARES SIR KEITH JOSEPH,SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INDUSTRY. OF COURSE, HE AND HIS COLLEAGUES mAY WELL BELIEVE THIS, FOR THEY RESIDE IN "ANOTHER NATION" - IN FACT, MORE THAN 14 MILLION BRITONS, A QUARTER OF OUR pOpULATION,NOW LIVE.IN OR CLOSE TO ACTUAL POVERTY. A SOLUTION TO THIS POVERTY, NOT A BRUTAL IZING OF THE POOR, . REMAINS THE KEY TO THE RENAISSANCE OF 0,UR NATION, MANY AMERICANS ADMIRE THE WAy THE BRITISH PEOPLE SUCCESSFULLY STOOD ALONE AGAINST THE NAZIS. THIS WAS ACHIEVED IN GREAT PART BECALS EMERGENCY MEASURES OF EQUALITY wERE THRUST UPON-OUR CLASS-RIDDEN SDCIETY AND THE NATIONAL BURDEN wAS SHARED MORE THAN EVER "THERE
BEFORE.
NO CHILD
NO HAN OR VNAN
wENT TO SLEEP HUNGRY, WAS DECLARED OBSELETE,
AS THOUSANDS DO NOW, AS MILLIONS
MORALE AND INCENTIVE, DECENCY AND COURAGE 4,VN THAT wOULD WIN AGAIN, GI VEN THE CHANCE, ENDS
HALL
F NEA-JS
t•_
•
ARE NOW. DAY.
AND THEY