Comprehensive transportation plan


[PDF]Comprehensive transportation plan - Rackcdn.com10ba4283a7fbcc3461c6-31fb5188b09660555a4c2fcc1bea63d9.r13.cf1.rackcdn.com...

10 downloads 141 Views 7MB Size

WSU C21417 EXHIBIT A GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

DEFINITIONS As used throughout this CONTRACT, the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below: A. "UNIVERSITY" shall mean Washington State University, an institution of higher education of the State of Washington, any division, section, office, unit or other entity of the UNIVERSITY, or any of the officers or other officials lawfully representing that UNIVERSITY. B. "AGENT" shall mean the delegated individual authorized in writing to act on the UNIVERSITY’S behalf. C. "CONTRACTOR" shall mean that firm, provider, organization, individual or other entity performing service(s) under this contract, and shall include all employees of the CONTRACTOR. D. "SUBCONTRACTOR" shall mean one not in the employment of the CONTRACTOR, who is performing all or part of those services under this contract under a separate contract with the CONTRACTOR. The terms "SUBCONTRACTOR" and "SUBCONTRACTORS" means SUBCONTRACTOR(s) in any tier. ACCESS TO DATA In compliance with RCW 39.29.080, the CONTRACTOR shall provide access to data generated under this contract to UNIVERSITY, the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee, and the State Auditor at no additional cost. This includes access to all information that supports the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the CONTRACTOR’S reports, including computer models and methodology for those models. ADVANCE PAYMENTS PROHIBITED In accordance with state law, no payments in advance of or in anticipation of goods or services to be provided under this CONTRACT shall be made by the UNIVERSITY. AMENDMENTS This CONTRACT may be amended by mutual agreement of the parties. Such amendments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each of the parties. ASSIGNMENT Neither this contract, nor any claim arising under this contract, shall be transferred or assigned by the CONTRACTOR without prior written consent of the UNIVERSITY. ATTORNEYS’ FEES In the event of litigation or other action brought to enforce contract terms, each party agrees to bear its own attorney fees and costs. CONFIDENTIALITY/SAFEGUARDING OF INFORMATION The CONTRACTOR shall not use or disclose any information concerning the UNIVERSITY, or information that may be classified as confidential, for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of this contract, except with prior written consent of the UNIVERSITY, or as may be required by law.

EXHIBIT A

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS - GEN

CONFLICT OF INTEREST Notwithstanding any determination by the Executive Ethics Board or other tribunal, the UNIVERSITY may, in its sole discretion, by written notice to the CONTRACTOR terminate this contract if it is found after due notice and examination by the UNIVERSITY that there is a violation of the Ethics in Public Service Act, Chapter 42.52 RCW; or any similar statute involving the CONTRACTOR in the procurement of, or performance under this contract. In the event this contract is terminated as provided above, the UNIVERSITY shall be entitled to pursue the same remedies against the CONTRACTOR as it could pursue in the event of a breach of the contract by the CONTRACTOR. The rights and remedies of the UNIVERSITY provided for in this clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law. The existence of facts upon which the AGENT makes any determination under this clause shall be an issue and may be reviewed as provided in the “Disputes” clause of this contract. COPYRIGHT PROVISIONS Unless otherwise provided, all materials produced under this contract shall be considered "works for hire" as defined by the U.S. Copyright Act and shall be owned by the UNIVERSITY. The UNIVERSITY shall be considered the author of such materials. In the event the materials are not considered “works for hire” under the U.S. Copyright laws, CONTRACTOR hereby irrevocably assigns all right, title, and interest in materials, including all intellectual property rights, to the UNIVERSITY effective from the moment of creation of such materials. Materials means all items in any format and includes, but is not limited to, data, reports, documents, pamphlets, advertisements, books, magazines, surveys, studies, computer programs, films, tapes, and/or sound reproductions. Ownership includes the right to copyright, patent, register and the ability to transfer these rights. For materials that are delivered under the contract, but that incorporate pre-existing materials not produced under the contract, CONTRACTOR hereby grants to the UNIVERSITY a nonexclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license (with rights to sublicense others) in such materials to translate, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works, publicly perform, and publicly display. The CONTRACTOR warrants and represents that CONTRACTOR has all rights and permissions, including intellectual property rights, moral rights and rights of publicity, necessary to grant such a license to the UNIVERSITY. The CONTRACTOR shall exert all reasonable effort to advise the UNIVERSITY, at the time of delivery of materials furnished under this contract, of all known or potential invasions of privacy contained therein and of any portion of such document that was not produced in the performance of this contract. The UNIVERSITY shall receive prompt written notice of each notice or claim of infringement received by the CONTRACTOR with respect to any data delivered under this contract. The UNIVERSITY shall have the right to modify or remove any restrictive markings placed upon the data by the CONTRACTOR. However, CONTRACTOR shall have no liability for any unauthorized modifications, additional use for other than the original intended purpose, or derivative works. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES The CONTRACTOR warrants that no person or selling agent has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established agents maintained by the CONTRACTOR for securing business. V.31709 – AGO Approved

Page 2 of 8

EXHIBIT A

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS - GEN

The UNIVERSITY shall have the right, in the event of breach of this clause by the CONTRACTOR, to annul this contract without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from the contract price or consideration or recover by other means the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee. DISALLOWED COSTS The CONTRACTOR is responsible for any audit exceptions or costs disallowed by the UNIVERSITY that are incurred by the CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors. DISPUTES In the event that a dispute arises under this Contract that the parties can’t resolve, they shall allow the dispute to be decided by a Dispute Panel in the following manner: each party to this Contract shall appoint one member to the Dispute Panel, and the members so appointed shall jointly appoint an additional member to the Dispute Panel. The Dispute Panel shall review the facts, contract terms and applicable statutes and rules and make a determination of the dispute. The determination of the Dispute Panel shall be final and binding on the parties hereto. The parties shall equally share the costs, if any, for the services of the Dispute Panel. Nothing in this contract shall be construed to limit the parties’ choice of a mutually acceptable alternate dispute resolution method in addition to the dispute resolution procedure outlined above. DUPLICATE PAYMENT The UNIVERSITY shall not pay the CONTRACTOR, if the CONTRACTOR has charged or will charge Washington State University, the State of Washington or any other party under any other contract or agreement, for the same services or expenses. FUNDING CONTINGENCY In the event funding from state, federal, or other sources is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way after the effective date of this contract and prior to normal completion, the UNIVERSITY may terminate the contract under the "Termination for Convenience" clause, without the ten-day notice requirement, subject to renegotiation at the UNIVERSITY’S discretion under those new funding limitations and conditions. GOVERNING LAW This contract shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington, and the venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in the Superior Court for Whitman County. INDEMNIFICATION To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Washington State University, the State of Washington, agencies of the State and all officials, agents and employees of the State, from and against all claims for injuries or death to the extent arising out of or resulting from the negligent performance of the contract. “Claim,” as used in this contract, means any financial loss, claim, suit, action, damage, or expense, including but not limited to attorney’s fees, attributable for bodily injury, sickness, disease, or death, or injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom. CONTRACTOR’S obligations to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless includes any claim by CONTRACTORS’ agents, employees, representatives, or any subcontractor or its employees.

V.31709 – AGO Approved

Page 3 of 8

EXHIBIT A

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS - GEN

CONTRACTOR expressly agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Washington State University and the State of Washington for any claim arising out of or incident to CONTRACTOR’S or any subcontractor’s negligent performance or failure to perform the contract. CONTRACTOR’S obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Washington State University and the State of Washington may be eliminated or reduced by any actual concurrent negligence of State or its agents, agencies, employees and officials. CONTRACTOR waives its immunity under Title 51 RCW to the extent it is required to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Washington State University and the State of Washington and its agencies, officials, agents or employees. INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF THE CONTRACTOR The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this contract. The CONTRACTOR and his or her employees or agents performing under this contract are not employees or agents of the UNIVERSITY. The CONTRACTOR will not hold himself/herself out as or claim to be an officer or employee of the UNIVERSITY or of the State of Washington by reason hereof, nor will the CONTRACTOR make any claim of right, privilege or benefit that would accrue to such employee under law. Conduct and control of the work will be solely with the CONTRACTOR. INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE COVERAGE The CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Title 51 RCW, Industrial Insurance. If the CONTRACTOR fails to provide industrial insurance coverage or fails to pay premiums or penalties on behalf of its employees, as may be required by law, UNIVERSITY may collect from the CONTRACTOR the full amount payable to the Industrial Insurance accident fund. The UNIVERSITY may deduct the amount owed by the CONTRACTOR to the accident fund from the amount payable to the CONTRACTOR by the UNIVERSITY under this contract, and transmit the deducted amount to the Department of Labor and Industries, (L&I) Division of Insurance Services. This provision does not waive any of L&I’s rights to collect from the CONTRACTOR. LICENSING, ACCREDITATION AND REGISTRATION The CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal licensing, accreditation and registration requirements/standards, necessary for the performance of this contract. LIMITATION OF AUTHORITY Only a WSU UNIVERSITY’S personnel authorized in writing to bind UNIVERSITY (delegation to be made prior to action) shall have the express, implied, or apparent authority to alter, amend, modify, or waive any clause or condition of this contract. Any alterations, amendment, modifications, or waivers made by UNIVERSITY personnel or employees without such written authority will not be effective or binding unless also made in writing and signed by an authorized UNIVERSITY representative. NONDISCRIMINATION During the performance of this contract, the CONTRACTOR shall comply with all federal and state nondiscrimination laws, regulations and policies, including the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) OF 1990, PUBLIC LAW 101-336, also referred to as the "ADA" 28 CFR Part 35. In the event of the CONTRACTOR'S non-compliance or refusal to comply with any nondiscrimination law, regulation, or policy, this contract may be rescinded, canceled or terminated in whole or in part, and the CONTRACTOR may be declared ineligible for further contracts with the UNIVERSITY. The CONTRACTOR shall, however, be given a reasonable time in which to cure V.31709 – AGO Approved

Page 4 of 8

EXHIBIT A

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS - GEN

this noncompliance. Any dispute may be resolved in accordance with the "Disputes" procedure set forth herein. PRIVACY Personal information including, but not limited to, “Protected Health Information,” collected, used, or acquired in connection with this contract shall be protected against unauthorized use, disclosure, modification or loss. CONTRACTOR shall ensure its directors, officers, employees, subcontractors or agents use personal information solely for the purposes of accomplishing the services set forth herein. CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors agree not to release, divulge, publish, transfer, sell or otherwise make known to unauthorized persons personal information without the express written consent of the UNIVERSITY or as otherwise required by law. Any breach of this provision may result in termination of the contract and the demand for return of all personal information. The CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the UNIVERSITY for any damages related to the CONTRACTOR’S unauthorized use of personal information. PUBLICITY The CONTRACTOR agrees to submit to the UNIVERSITY all advertising and publicity matters relating to this contract wherein the UNIVERSITY’S name is mentioned or language used from which the connection of the UNIVERSITY’S name may, in the UNIVERSITY’S judgment, be inferred or implied. The CONTRACTOR agrees not to publish or use such advertising and publicity matters without the prior written consent of the UNIVERSITY. RECORDS MAINTENANCE The CONTRACTOR shall maintain books, records, documents, data and other evidence relating to this contract and performance of the services described herein, including but not limited to accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended in the performance of this contract. CONTRACTOR shall retain such records for a period of six years following the date of final payment. At no additional cost, these records, including materials generated under the contract, shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection, review or audit by the UNIVERSITY, personnel duly authorized by the UNIVERSITY, the Office of the State Auditor, and federal and state officials so authorized by law, regulation or agreement. If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the six (6) year period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. REGISTRATION WITH DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE If required to do so by law, the CONTRACTOR shall complete registration with the Washington State Department of Revenue and be responsible for payment of all taxes due on payments made under this contract. RIGHT OF INSPECTION The CONTRACTOR shall provide right of access to its facilities to the UNIVERSITY, or any of its officers, or to any other authorized agent or official of the state of Washington or the federal government, at all reasonable times, in order to monitor and evaluate performance, compliance, and/or quality assurance under this contract.

V.31709 – AGO Approved

Page 5 of 8

EXHIBIT A

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS - GEN

SEVERABILITY The provisions of this contract are intended to be severable. If any term or provision is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the contract. SITE SECURITY While on UNIVERSITY premises, CONTRACTOR, its agents, employees, or subcontractors shall conform in all respects with UNIVERSITY’S physical, fire or other security policies or regulations. SUBCONTRACTING Neither the CONTRACTOR nor any approved SUBCONTRACTOR shall enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Contract without obtaining prior written approval of the UNIVERSITY. In no event shall the existence of the subcontract operate to release or reduce the liability of the CONTRACTOR to the UNIVERSITY for any breach in the performance of the CONTRACTOR’s duties. This clause does not include contracts of employment between the contractor and personnel assigned to work under this contract. Additionally, the CONTRACTOR is responsible for ensuring that all terms, conditions, assurances and certifications set forth in this CONTRACT are carried forward to any subcontracts. CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors agree not to release, divulge, publish, transfer, sell or otherwise make known to unauthorized persons personal information without the express written consent of the UNIVERSITY or as provided by law. TAXES All payments accrued because of payroll taxes, unemployment contributions, any other related taxes, insurance or other expenses for the CONTRACTOR or its staff shall be the sole responsibility of the CONTRACTOR. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE In the event the UNIVERSITY determines the CONTRACTOR has failed to comply with the conditions of this contract in a timely manner, the UNIVERSITY has the right to suspend or terminate this contract. Before suspending or terminating the contract, the UNIVERSITY shall notify the CONTRACTOR in writing of the need to take corrective action. If corrective action is not taken within 30 calendar days of date of notice, the contract may be terminated or suspended. In the event of termination or suspension, the CONTRACTOR shall be liable for damages as authorized by law including, but not limited to, any cost difference between the original contract and the replacement or cover contract and all administrative costs directly related to the replacement contract, e.g., cost of the competitive bidding, mailing, advertising and staff time. The UNIVERSITY reserves the right to suspend all or part of the contract, withhold further payments, or prohibit the CONTRACTOR from incurring additional obligations of funds during investigation of the alleged compliance breach and pending corrective action by the CONTRACTOR or a decision by the UNIVERSITY to terminate the contract. A termination shall be deemed a “Termination for Convenience” if it is determined that the CONTRACTOR: (1) was not in default; or (2) failure to perform was outside of his or her control, fault or negligence. The rights and remedies of the UNIVERSITY provided in this contract are not exclusive and are, in addition to any other rights and remedies, provided by law.

V.31709 – AGO Approved

Page 6 of 8

EXHIBIT A

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS - GEN

TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE Except as otherwise provided in this Contract, the UNIVERSITY may, by 30 calendar days written notice terminate this Contract, in whole or in part. If this Contract is so terminated, the UNIVERSITY shall be liable only for payment required under the terms of this contract for services rendered or goods delivered prior to the effective date of termination.

TERMINATION PROCEDURES Upon termination of this CONTRACT, the UNIVERSITY, in addition to any other rights provided in this CONTRACT, may require the CONTRACTOR to deliver to the UNIVERSITY any property specifically produced or acquired for the performance of such part of this contract as has been terminated. The provisions of the "Treatment of Assets" clause shall apply in such property transfer. The UNIVERSITY shall pay to the CONTRACTOR the agreed upon price, if separately stated, for completed work and services accepted by the UNIVERSITY, and the amount agreed upon by the CONTRACTOR and the UNIVERSITY for (i) completed work and services for which no separate price is stated, (ii) partially completed work and services, (iii) other property or services that are accepted by the UNIVERSITY, and (iv) the protection and preservation of property, unless the termination is for default, in which case the AGENT shall determine the extent of the liability of the UNIVERSITY. Failure to agree with such determination shall be a dispute within the meaning of the "Disputes" clause of this contract. The UNIVERSITY may, in good faith, withhold from any amounts due the CONTRACTOR such sum as the AGENT determines to be necessary to protect the UNIVERSITY against potential loss or liability. The rights and remedies of the UNIVERSITY provided in this section shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Contract. After receipt of a notice of termination, and except as otherwise directed by the UNIVERSITY, the CONTRACTOR shall: 1. Stop work under the contract on the date, and to the extent specified, in the notice; 2. Place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, services, or facilities except as may be necessary for completion of such portion of the work under the contract that is not terminated; 3. Assign to the UNIVERSITY, in the manner, at the times, and to the extent directed by the UNIVERSITY, all of the rights, title, and interest of the CONTRACTOR under the orders and subcontracts so terminated, in which case the UNIVERSITY has the right, at its discretion, to settle or pay any or all claims arising out of the termination of such orders and subcontracts; 4. Settle all outstanding liabilities and all claims arising out of such termination of orders and subcontracts, with the approval or ratification of the UNIVERSITY to the extent UNIVERSITY may require, which approval or ratification shall be final for all the purposes of this clause; 5. Transfer title to the UNIVERSITY and deliver in the manner, at the times, and to the extent directed by the UNIVERSITY any property which, if the contract had been completed, would have been required to be furnished to the UNIVERSITY; 6. Complete performance of such part of the work as shall not have been terminated by the UNIVERSITY; and

V.31709 – AGO Approved

Page 7 of 8

EXHIBIT A

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS - GEN

7. Take such action as may be necessary, or as the UNIVERSITY may direct, for the protection and preservation of the property related to this contract, which is in the possession of the CONTRACTOR and in which the UNIVERSITY has or may acquire an interest. TREATMENT OF ASSETS A. Title to all property furnished by the UNIVERSITY shall remain in the UNIVERSITY. Title to all property furnished by the CONTRACTOR, for the cost of which the CONTRACTOR is entitled to be reimbursed as a direct item of cost under this contract, shall pass to and vest in the UNIVERSITY upon delivery of such property by the CONTRACTOR. Title to other property, the cost of which is reimbursable to the CONTRACTOR under this contract, shall pass to and vest in the UNIVERSITY upon (i) issuance for use of such property in the performance of this contract, or (ii) commencement of use of such property in the performance of this contract, or (iii) reimbursement of the cost thereof by the UNIVERSITY in whole or in part, whichever first occurs. B. Any property of the UNIVERSITY furnished to the CONTRACTOR shall, unless otherwise provided herein or approved by the UNIVERSITY, be used only for the performance of this contract. C. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any loss or damage to property of the UNIVERSITY that results from the negligence of the CONTRACTOR or which results from the failure on the part of the CONTRACTOR to maintain and administer that property in accordance with sound management practices. D. If any UNIVERSITY property is lost, destroyed or damaged, the CONTRACTOR shall immediately notify the UNIVERSITY and shall take all reasonable steps to protect the property from further damage. E. The CONTRACTOR shall surrender to the UNIVERSITY all property of the UNIVERSITY prior to settlement upon completion, termination or cancellation of this contract F. All reference to the CONTRACTOR under this clause shall also include CONTRACTOR'S employees, agents or SUBCONTRACTORS. WAIVER Waiver of any default or breach shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default or breach. Any waiver shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this contract unless stated to be such in writing and signed by authorized representative of the UNIVERSITY.

V.31709 – AGO Approved

Page 8 of 8

WSU C21417 EXHIBIT B

Wa s h i n g t o n S t a t e Un i v e r s i t y

Comprehensive

transportation plan RFP No. 6990-RWSUTP13

Prepared for

Prepared by

November 22, 2013

EXHIBIT C VENDOR PROFILE

VENDOR: Website: Federal Tax Id No.: WA State Dept. of Revenue Tax Registration No.: Contacts: Name/Title: Telephone: Fax: Email: Contacts Name/Title Telephone Fax: Email: Contacts: Name/Title: Telephone: Fax: Email: Payment/Invoicing Addresses: Name: Address: Business Hours: After Hours:

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3001 Weston Parkway, Cary, NC 27513-2301 www.kimley-horn.com 56-0885615 61-432-568 Contract Administration Primary Contact L. Dennis Burns, CAPP/Associate (602) 944-5500 (602) 944-7423 [email protected]

Contract Administration Alternate Contact Brett Wood, P.E., CAPP/Associate (602) 944-5500 (602) 944-7423 [email protected]

Purchase Orders/Contract to be sent to: L. Dennis Burns, CAPP/Associate

602- 906-1125 (602) 944-7423 [email protected]

Customer Service

Invoicing/Billing

L. Dennis Burns, CAPP/Associate Rochelle Swenson/Accounting 602- 906-1125 602-678-3433 (602) 944-7423 [email protected] [email protected]

Billing Will Be From

Payment Sent To (Remit)

Rochelle Swenson/Accounting 7740 North 16th Street, Suite 300 P.O. Box 79384 City of Industry, CA 91716-9384 Phoenix, AZ 85020 Monday-Friday, 8:00AM-5:30PM

Contractor Minimum Qualifications The following are minimum qualifications to be considered for award of this contract: Is your business licensed in the State of Washington? Yes No Will you become licensed within thirty (30) days if you are the Apparent Successful Contractor? Yes No Does your proposed team have operational expertise with designing and implementing successful transportation plans? Yes No 22 WSU RFP 6990-RWSUTP13

Do you or your firm have a proven track record including being the primary and responsible party for a comprehensive transportation and parking plan in a large university setting? Yes No Have you or your firm performed at least three (3) relevant transportation planning projects in the last five (5) years? Yes No Can you provide a comprehensive, dynamic, and iterative transportation and parking demand analysis model that will be provided to WSU in perpetuity? Yes No If answer to any questions above are no, please explain:

Subcontractors In the event of contract award, will Subcontractors be used by your firm to fulfill contractual requirements? Yes No MWBE Contractors Please identify if your firm or Subcontractor currently is certified or self-certified as a Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise business in Washington State? Yes

No

. (If reply is “Yes” attach letter to this bid response explaining detail(s).

Veteran owned Contractors Please identify if your firm or Subcontractor currently is a Veteran Owned business. Yes

No

. (If reply is “Yes” attach letter to this bid response explaining detail(s).

SMALL BUSINESS SELF-CERTIFICATION STATEMENT "Small business" means an in-state business, including a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership, or other legal entity, that: (a) Certifies, under penalty of perjury, that it is owned and operated independently from all other businesses and has either: (i) Fifty or fewer employees; or (ii) A gross revenue of less than seven million dollars annually as reported on its federal income tax return or its return filed with the department of revenue over the previous three consecutive years; or (b) Is certified with the office of women and minority business enterprises under chapter 39.19 RCW. I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that [Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.] meets the above definition of “small business”. Signature of person authorized to sign on behalf of legal entity Michael J. Hermann, P.E.

Written name

11/21/13

Date 23

WSU RFP 6990-RWSUTP13

EXHIBIT A CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent to the award or continuation of the related contract: 1. I/we declare that all answers and statements made in the proposal are true and correct. 2. The prices and/or cost data have been determined independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement with others for the purpose of restricting competition. However, I/we may freely join with other persons or organizations for the purpose of presenting a single proposal. 3. The attached proposal is a firm offer for a period of 90 days following receipt, and it may be accepted by the University without further negotiation (except where obviously required by lack of certainty in key terms) at any time within the 90-day period. 4. In preparing this proposal, I/we have not been assisted by any current or former employee of the state of Washington or Washington State University whose duties relate (or did relate) to this proposal or prospective contract, and who was assisting in other than his or her official, public capacity. If there are exceptions to these assurances, I/we have described them in full detail on a separate page attached to this document. 5. I/we understand that the University will not reimburse me/us for any costs incurred in the preparation of this proposal. All proposals become the property of the University, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items, or samples, unless so stated in this proposal. 6. Unless otherwise required by law, the prices and/or cost data which have been submitted have not been knowingly disclosed by the Proposer and will not knowingly be disclosed by him/her prior to opening, directly or indirectly, to any other Proposer or to any competitor. 7. I/we agree that submission of the attached proposal constitutes acceptance of the solicitation contents and the attached sample contract and general terms and conditions. If there are any exceptions to these terms, I/we have described those exceptions in detail on a page attached to this document. 8. No attempt has been made or will be made by the Proposer to induce any other person or firm to submit or not to submit a proposal for the purpose of restricting competition. 9. I/we grant the University the right to contact references and others, who may have pertinent information regarding the ability of the Consultant and the lead staff person to perform the services contemplated by this RFP.

19 WSU RFP 6990-RWSUTP13

10. If any staff member(s) who will perform work on this contract has retired from the State of Washington under the provisions of the 2008 Early Retirement Factors legislation, his/her name(s) is noted on a separately attached page. 11. We (circle one) are /are not submitting proposed Contract or Insurance exceptions. (See Contract and General Terms and Conditions.) If exceptions are being submitted, I/we have attached them to this form. On behalf of the Consultant submitting this proposal, my name below attests to the accuracy of the above statement. Michael J. Hermann, P.E. Signature of Proposer (Typed/Printed name of Proposer) Senior Vice President Title

11/21/13 Date

20 WSU RFP 6990-RWSUTP13

Standard Contract Review/Exceptions Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. Has reviewed the sample standard WSU contract provided with the RFP. We have identified three primary areas of concern. These are noted below:

We respectfully request that the following be added to the end of the Copyright Provisions paragraph. Copyright Provisions - “However, Contractor shall have no liability for any unauthorized modifications, additional use for other than the original intended purpose, or derivative works.”

We respectfully request that the following language be amended. Indemnification - “To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Washington State University, the State of Washington, agencies of the State and all officials, agents and employees of the State, from and against all claims for injuries or death to the extent arising out of or resulting from the negligent performance of the contract. “Claim”, as used in this contract, means any financial loss, claim, suit, action, damage, or expense, including but not limited to attorney’s fees, attributable for bodily injury, sickness, disease, or death, or injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom. CONTRACTOR’S obligations to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless includes any claim by CONTRACTOR’S agents, employees, representatives, or any subcontractor or its employees. CONTRACTOR expressly agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Washington State University and the State of Washington for any claim arising out of or incident to CONTRACTOR’S or any subcontractor’s negligent performance or failure to perform the contract. CONTRACTOR’S obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Washington State University and the State of Washington shall not be eliminated or reduced by any actual or alleged concurrent negligence of State or its agents, agencies, employees and officials. CONTRACTOR waives its immunity under Title 51 RCW to the extent it is required to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Washington State University and the State of Washington and its agencies, officials, agents or employees.

21 WSU RFP 6990-RWSUTP13

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Eric M. Rogers, Director, Purchasing Services Washington State University Purchasing Services French Ad. Bldg. Room 220 Pullman, WA 99164-1020



November 22, 2013

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 7740 N. 16th Street, Suite 300 Phoenix, AZ 85020 (602) 944-5500  (602) 944-7423 

RE: Washington State University, Request for Proposals No. 6990-RWSUTP13 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Dear Mr. Rogers and Members of the Selection Committee, Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. (Kimley-Horn) is pleased to submit this response for the above referenced project. University parking and transportation planning is a specialty area in which Kimley-Horn excels. We believe that when parking and transportation systems are designed properly, they can greatly enhance access to the campus and the surrounding community served, supporting the larger campus vision and master plan for Washington State University (WSU). Additionally, effective transportation, parking, and related mobility management strategies can go a long way in helping campus communities meet their long-term climate commitment or other sustainability goals by reducing dependence on automotive travel throughout the campus and adopting a “triple bottom line” management approach. As you evaluate this Request for Proposal (RFP) submittal, please consider the following key areas that we feel set our team apart: Our Team – Kimley-Horn has assembled a stellar team of transportation, parking, communications, and design professionals who are genuinely excited at the prospect of working with WSU. In fact, this is same team that recently collaborated on a very successful and similar project for Colorado State University (CSU). In addition to a wide range planning and engineering capabilities brought to the table by Kimley-Horn (including expertise in parking and transportation demand management operational expertise), we have supplemented our team in the areas of University parking and transportation operations and management by the inclusion of Mr. Casey Jones with Standard Parking Plus (SP Plus) (a division of Standard Parking) and Ms. Vanessa Solesbee founding Principal of The Solesbee Group (Solesbee Group). Our Approach – We take a more holistic and strategic approach to parking and transportation planning. Linking parking management and planning to larger campus and community master planning and transportation planning processes can provide significant additional benefits to the community by ensuring that policies, programs, and infrastructure are coordinated and supportive of the larger campus master plan’s goals. We also know, from our experience in working on other university campuses, the importance of effective campus community engagement. Beyond the basics of documenting community attitudes and commute behavior patterns, we take this analysis to a higher level by providing the transportation program with a robust set of “strategic communications” tools, media platforms, and on-going campus community engagement strategies. Our Technical Expertise and University Experience – We have a proven track record of meeting and exceeding the planning, program development, demand projection, and design/construction needs of transportation system owners and operators. We can help you develop transportation and Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

1

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

parking facilities that provide a positive first encounter for students, faculty, staff, and visitors. Our advanced planning capabilities and knowledge of national and international trends related to sustainable transportation and parking planning is another positive dimension that our team brings. Project Manager Dennis Burns has been involved with many industry leading innovations, including sustainability, management, operations, and planning. Additionally, Kimley-Horn is pleased to offer its cutting edged Park+ modeling platform, which allows for dynamic scenario planning related to growth, infrastructure, parking, and multimodal demands. This unique and industry leading tool will provide WSU with exciting new parking, transportation, and land-use planning capabilities that will serve the campus for decades to come and enhance collaborative campus planning between campus administration, planning, and transportation professionals going forward. Our Commitment to Quality and Service – Our team is committed to being highly responsive and providing the highest quality service. Over the past 46 years, Kimley-Horn has developed a strong track record of satisfying clients. It is important for us to focus on each project individually to understand the unique challenges and provide tailor-made solutions. You can count on us to listen to your needs and develop a parking and transportation plan that works for your campus. We urge you to contact some of our clients for a firsthand assessment of how Kimley-Horn responded to their special parking needs. We are genuinely excited about this opportunity to partner with WSU on this important project. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (602) 906-1125 (direct line) or on my mobile at (480) 290-5274 or via email at: [email protected]. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

L. Dennis Burns, CAPP Michael J. Hermann, P.E. Project Manager Senior Vice President

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

2

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Letter of Submittal (Additional Information) In accordance with the RFP instructions, the ten specific items requested to be addressed in the Letter of Submittal are detailed below: 1. Name, address, principal place of business, telephone number, and fax number/e-mail address of legal entity or individual with whom contract would be written. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) 7740 North 16th Street, Suite 300 Phoenix, AZ 85020 (Regional Office for the Kimley-Horn Mountain Region) Primary Point of Contact L. Dennis Burns, CAPP Direct Phone: (602) 906-1125 Mobile Phone: (480) 290-5274 Fax: (602) 944-7423 2. Name, address, email and telephone number of principal authorized to execute a contract. Kimley-Horn 7740 North 16th Street, Suite 300 Phoenix, AZ 85020 (Regional Office for the Kimley-Horn Mountain Region) Contact Authorization Michael J. Hermann, P.E., Senior Vice President Direct Phone: (602) 906-1178 Mobile Phone: (480) 209-8221 Fax: (602) 944-7423 3. Name, address, and telephone number, e-mail of contact for clarification of this RFP. Kimley-Horn L. Dennis Burns, CAPP Project Manager 7740 North 16th Street, Suite 300 Phoenix, AZ 85020 Direct Phone: (602) 906-1125 Mobile Phone: (480) 290-5274 Fax: (602) 944-7423 Email: [email protected] 4. Legal status of the Consultant (sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, etc.) and the year the entity was organized to do business as the entity now substantially exists. Legal status: Corporation Date of incorporation: February 10, 1967 Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

3

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

5. Location of the facility from which the Consultant would operate. The primary location from which the prime consultant would operate would be our Phoenix office: Kimley-Horn 7740 North 16th Street, Suite 300 Phoenix, AZ 85020 6. Identify any state employees or former state employees employed or on the firm’s governing board as of the date of the proposal. Include their position and responsibilities within the Consultant’s organization. If following a review of this information, it is determined by the University that a conflict of interest exists, the Consultant may be disqualified from further consideration for the award of a contract. Kimley-Horn Not Applicable - We have no state employees or former state employees employed or on the firm’s governing board as of the date of the proposal. Solesbee Group Not Applicable - They have no state employees or former state employees employed or on the firm’s governing board as of the date of the proposal. SP Plus Not Applicable - They have no state employees or former state employees employed or on the firm’s governing board as of the date of the proposal. 7. If the Consultant or any subcontractor contracted with the state of Washington during the past 24 months, indicate the name of the agency, the contract number and project description and/or other information available to identify the contract. Kimley-Horn Not Applicable - We have not contracted with State of Washington employees or former state employees nor do we have state employees or former state employee that are on our firm’s governing board as of the date of the proposal. Solesbee Group Not Applicable - They have not contracted with State of Washington employees or former state employees nor do they have state employees or former state employee that are on our firm’s governing board as of the date of the proposal. SP Plus Not Applicable - They have not contracted with State of Washington employees or former state employees nor do they have state employees or former state employee that are on our firm’s governing board as of the date of the proposal.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

4

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

8. If the Consultant’s staff or subcontractor’s staff was an employee of the state of Washington during the past 24 months, or is currently a Washington State employee, identify the individual by name, the agency previously or currently employed by, job title or position held and separation date. Kimley-Horn Not Applicable - Neither Kimley-Horn nor our proposed sub-consultants have contracted with either State of Washington employees or former state employees nor have we contracted with state employees or former state employee that are on our firm’s governing board as of the date of the proposal. 9. If the Consultant has had a contract terminated for default in the last five years, describe such incident. Termination for default is defined as notice to stop performance due to the Consultant’s non-performance or poor performance and the issue of performance was either (a) not litigated due to inaction on the part of the Proposer, or (b) litigated and such litigation determined that the Proposer was in default. Kimley-Horn and its subsidiaries have provided services in all fifty states and numerous countries. Because of the many and varied projects we have completed, we are subject to various legal proceedings from time to time and in the ordinary course of business. It is not practical to provide a complete list as part of this proposal. None of the pending matters, if decided against Kimley-Horn, would have a material impact on our financial statements or impair in any way our ability to serve our clients. Generally, these matters are covered by insurance, and we consider them to be without merit. If you would like to discuss our legal matters in more detail, please contact Kimley-Horn’s General Counsel, Richard Cook, at (919) 677-2058. 10. Submit full details of the terms for default including the other party’s name, address, and phone number. Present the Consultant’s position on the matter. The University will evaluate the facts and may, at its sole discretion, reject the proposal on the grounds of the past experience. If no such termination for default has been experienced by the Consultant in the past five years, so indicate. Kimley-Horn and its subsidiaries have provided services in all fifty states and numerous countries. Because of the many and varied projects we have completed, we are subject to various legal proceedings from time to time and in the ordinary course of business. It is not practical to provide a complete list as part of this proposal. None of the pending matters, if decided against Kimley-Horn, would have a material impact on our financial statements or impair in any way our ability to serve our clients. Generally, these matters are covered by insurance, and we consider them to be without merit. If you would like to discuss our legal matters in more detail, please contact Kimley-Horn’s General Counsel, Richard Cook, at (919) 677-2058.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

5

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL Overview Founded in 1967 by transportation engineers and traffic operations experts, Kimley-Horn is a privately held, employee-owned firm that provides a wide variety of services for public and private projects. With a staff of over 1,900 in 60 offices across the United States, our firm has grown to become a recognized leader in engineering consulting. As a fully integrated consulting firm, we offer a variety of in-house civil engineering services, including: ‹‹Parking Strategic Management and Operations ‹‹Parking Design and Assessment ‹‹Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning ‹‹Geographic Information Systems (GIS) ‹‹Bridges/Structures Design ‹‹Roadway Design ‹‹Construction Administration/Management ‹‹Drainage Analysis and Design ‹‹Hydrology/Hydraulics ‹‹Electrical Engineering ‹‹Environmental Permitting and Clearances ‹‹Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) ‹‹Landscape Architecture ‹‹Right-of-Way ‹‹Water/Wastewater ‹‹Utilities/Railroad Coordination ‹‹Aviation and Pavement Engineering Kimley-Horn has a staff of more than 50 parking professionals. Our parking expertise and experience is renowned throughout the U.S. and ranges from planning to design, and everything in between. More specifically, we have experts in the fields of strategic planning, supply-demand analysis, demand management, revenue control, parking pricing, program management, structural design, context sensitive design, traffic circulation, and more. Our client base includes municipalities, universities, medical campuses, private development, and beyond. We provide high-quality services and products to every project no matter the complexity or size.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

6

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Subconsultants The Solesbee Group (Solesbee Group) — Community Engagement and Strategic Communications

Solesbee Group is a woman-owned firm focused on helping downtowns, main streets and commercial districts develop and implement revitalization initiatives with a special focus on parking program brand development, strategic communications and stakeholder engagement. Vanessa K. Solesbee, is founder and president of Solesbee Group and she works with clients to develop creative approaches that strengthen and promote communities through innovative marketing and community outreach campaigns. Solesbee Group also provides expertise in the areas of organizational development and training, research and economic development funding strategies. Ms. Solesbee is a member of the International Parking Institute (IPI), where she serves on several committees. Ms. Solesbee has participated in multiple Parking Expert Advisory teams across the country, including work in Colorado, Houston, Iowa, Montana and New Jersey. She holds a masters degree from The University of Texas at Austin.

Standard Parking Plus (SP Plus) — Parking Operations, Special Events Management

SP Plus is the leading provider of parking management, ground transportation and other ancillary services to institutional, commercial, and municipal clients in the United States and Canada. Their services include a comprehensive set of on‐site parking management and ground transportation services, which consist of training, scheduling and supervising all service personnel as well as providing customer service, marketing, maintenance and accounting and revenue control functions necessary to facilitate the operation of our clients’ parking and transportation systems. They also provide a range of ancillary services such as shuttle operations, taxi and livery dispatch services and meter revenue collection and enforcement services. Their clients choose to work with them in order to attract, service and retain customers, gain access to the breadth and depth of our service and process expertise, leverage our significant technology capabilities and enhance their parking facility revenue, profitability and cash flow.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

7

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Experience of the Consultant Colorado State University Parking and Transportation Master Plan, Fort Collins, Colorado, ‹‹Public University ‹‹Student Population: 27,000

The overall goal of this project was to assist Colorado State University (CSU) by integrating the substantial parking and transportation planning work already done into a comprehensive parking and transportation master plan. The following is a summary of the scope of services: Parking ‹‹With an end goal being to address parking resource allocation and management strategies, the study will: zz Analyze current parking statistics provided by CSU Parking Services zz Analyze current accessible parking allocation in relation to the Americans with Disabilities Act zz Provide an overview assessment of current parking management practices zz Analyze current parking pricing and project pricing strategies to meet future parking needs ‹‹Using the campus Facilities Master Plan, evaluate the impacts of proposed building projects and project parking space losses. zz Develop a recommended ratio of population to parking spaces to ensure adequate parking for faculty/staff, resident students, commuter students, visitors, and service vehicles zz Explore a variety of parking resource allocation strategies and identify potential options. One of these options should be remote/off campus parking facilities. ‹‹Develop concepts and estimate capital costs associated with the development of new parking structures ‹‹Provide projected revenues and expenses associated with recommended alternatives, including recurring maintenance and operating expenses ‹‹Prepare, implement, and analyze a campus-wide survey on parking behaviors Transportation ‹‹Review potential transportation strategies to improve access to the main campus and reduce parking demand. The study analyzed: zz The current bike infrastructure (racks, paths, etc.) and provide strategies for improvement zz Analyze the current vehicle, pedestrian, and bike traffic densities and patterns and provide a plan for future traffic circulation in and around campus zz Prepare, implement, and analyze a campus-wide survey on transportation and commuting behaviors Sustainability ‹‹Sustainability and environmental awareness are strategic goals of CSU zz Kimley-Horn’s experience in developing successful sustainable transportation visions, our proven collaboration skills, and our academic/institutional project experience were all brought to bear on this project

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

8

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

The CSU parking and transportation master plan will function as a blueprint for parking and transportation planning and policy development for the next five to ten years. Given the dynamic nature of the campus environment, our plan will also focus on providing CSU staff with flexible planning formats and tools designed to respond to changing sets of development variables. In addition to reviewing previous assessments of parking needs, this plan will also address parking resource allocation and management strategies and work to ensure that parking plays the proper support role in advancing the large university vision and master plan. Another important dimension to the proposed parking and transportation master plan is an evaluation of transit and transportation demand management strategies and their potential to mitigate the increasing demand for parking. This integrated approach to evaluating parking and transportation issues is our recommended approach and meshes well with the new and changing campus realities as described by CSU planning staff. The same is true for assessing traffic impacts associated with specific development projects. Although ultimately we will present an integrated parking and transportation plan, from a practical perspective this study was structured with the major analysis areas treated as separate phases. Additional Services Provided ‹‹CSU Park+ Parking Demand Model ‹‹Shields and Plum Parking Garage Plan (for submittal to Board of Regents) ‹‹Bay Farms Area Parking Garages Plan (for submittal to Board of Regents) ‹‹Included a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Plain Assessment ‹‹Development of a Traffic and Parking Event Management Plan for a proposed new on-campus football stadium

Time frame of service

2011 – 2013 Stadium Traffic and Parking Event Management Plan current in process.

Problems encountered and how they were overcome

One of the initial problems we encountered was a need to get baseline traffic on the campus documented before the Spring semester let out. This was complicated by a planned series of road closures related to the implementation of a new bus-rapid-transit system that was being developed adjacent to the campus. This conflict became apparent during the project kick-off meeting and Kimley-Horn was able to draw on resources from our Denver office to expedite traffic counts prior to the closing of a major campus intersection and get the required counts prior to end of the Spring semester. Another challenge involved collecting parking utilization data for a large surface lot that served the Moby Arena on campus. Because we were mobilized for the overall campus traffic surveys, we were also able to get the desired event counts at the intersections near Moby Arena on the last major basketball game of the semester. Kimley-Horn used an advanced data collection technique for our campus traffic counts (initially 27 intersections) and “campus cordon study”. This technique utilized a video process to collect the traffic data at all intersections and were therefore able to count not only motorized vehicles (cars, buses, etc.) but also pedestrian and bicycle volumes by direction as well. All of this data later fed into a comprehensive campus traffic simulation model.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

9

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Steps used to meet the company’s or institution’s objectives for the project

We leveraged several industry relationships and strategic partnerships to bring added value to the CSU project. Specifically, we tapped into Kimley-Horn’s extensive Transportation Demand Management and other advanced transportation planning resources (T\transit system development, campus planning, and complete streets expertise, etc.). We also brought in two subconsultant firms for their specialty expertise. These included Mr. Casey Jones with Standard Parking Plus to assist in preparing an objective assessment of the University’s current parking management program. We also utilized the extensive marketing and communications expertise of The Solesbee Group (Solesbee) to assist in the development and execution of a comprehensive campus parking and transportation survey process (which generated over 2,600 completed responses – approximately 10% of the campus population). Solesbee also worked closely with project manager Dennis Burns to develop a range of “strategic communications” strategies for the University going forward. Both Mr. Jones and Ms. Solesbee are included on our project team for the WSU project.

Criteria used to evaluate your services

Kimley-Horn has a national client survey and project evaluation process that it uses on a regular basis. CSU was surveyed as it related to this particular project. The primary CSU project contact, Mr. Dave Bradford, Director of Parking and Transportation rated Kimley-Horn’s performance as a 10 out of 10.

Description of how this client demonstrates your expertise for this RFP

The overall scope and goals of the CSU Parking and Transportation Master Plan project is very similar to the services requested by WSU. Both schools are growing land grant universities with similar campus characteristics, student populations, and program descriptions. Another similarity is the community settings of the two schools. Kimley-Horn had recently done an extensive amount of work for the City of Fort Collins. Kimley-Horn developed a parking strategic plan for the City and also developed parking demand modeling software and tools for both the University and the City. These modeling tools are now helping both institutions better plan for the future.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

10

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

University of Washington Parking Technology Assessment, Seattle, WA ‹‹Public University ‹‹Student Population: 42,570

The overall project was to assess their current parking operations, inclusive of: revenue control equipment, permitting system and operations, enforcement activities, gate house control of vehicles entering campus, operational use of campus parking facilities, and event processes. The first phase included proposed modifications to existing business processes to incorporate best practices and improve operations. The second phase is to assist in the procurement of replacement equipment and systems to be phased in over a two to three year time period without adversely affecting ongoing business activities. This system will incorporate the integration of several disparate devices and systems into a single, cohesive parking revenue system that provides more efficient customer service and interaction, enhanced controls over revenue, enhanced real-time information of parking utilization to enable enhanced management of parking assets, and better reporting. The system will be web-enabled to allow individual users to manage their specific accounts while providing the University of Washington (UW) enhanced controls over the utilization of their facilities.

Time frame of service

2011 – 2015 (Current On-Call Services Agreement)

Problems encountered and how they were overcome

There were several challenges with the design and implementation including the following: ‹‹Numerous, disparate systems that required integration and the transfer of data between the systems in real-time and batch in order to provide more efficient processing, billing, and collection of revenue. ‹‹The UW operates numerous surface lots (85) that are not controlled, however, collecting information and reporting the utilization of each of the lots is necessary to provide better management of the overall parking system. The use of mobile License Plate Recognition (LPR) vehicles was designed to capture utilization data several times per day while also assisting in the enforcement (alternative to individual Parking Enforcement Officers [PEOs] manually walking each lot). ‹‹The gate houses (main entrances to the campus) were not gated so vehicles could move freely onto and off campus without restriction. The mobile LPR enforcement vehicles allow UW to enforce the use of each parking facility. Also, the main entrances have been prepped for the installation of static LPR cameras. ‹‹UW has a very large parking fee structure that needed to be simplified prior to the implementation of a new Parking Revenue System.

Steps used to meet the company’s or institution’s objectives for the project

The primary goal was to provide a single system that could support the integration to the various components while providing exceptional customer service. The web-enabled system provides for an easy to use portal for all individual patrons to manage their accounts. The integration is easier since a single vendor is the prime supplier and are responsible for integrating the various components of the system including permitting system, parking revenue control system, parking meters, etc.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

11

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Criteria used to evaluate your services

The main criteria used to evaluate our services is the ability for Kimley-Horn to overcome the replacement of UW project managers during the course of the project and keep the project on track for full implementation by 2015. The system will be user friendly but provide UW the management tools to better manage their facilities.

Description of how this client demonstrates your expertise for this RFP

This successful project illustrates our effective and creative parking and transportation planning and technology experience. Having a strong working knowledge of not only university/campus dynamics, but also how technology innovations have improved, the parking experience is critical to framing successful projects. Experience and knowledge of parking industry vendors and which technology is appropriate for the project allows us to assist our clients to install the system that best meets their needs and requirements.

University of Washington Park+ Model, Seattle, WA ‹‹Public University ‹‹Student Population: 42,570

Kimley-Horn worked closely with the UW to develop a Park+ scenario planning model for its primary campus in Seattle, WA. The model development was part of the initial Beta development process, with Kimley-Horn and UW staff working collaboratively to develop key modules within the model and advanced fundamentals to drive the model operation. The new components of the Park+ model developed uniquely for UW included user type designations for walking tolerance, multimodal inputs, and parking facility relationships.

Time frame of service

October 2011 – June 2012

Problems encountered and how they were overcome

As a Beta tester of the model, UW was in a unique position to provide direct feedback into the development of the modeling application. Kimley-Horn worked closely with this team to correct issues, improve operability, and develop new modules to meet the needs of the University testing environment. In the end, UW was delivered a model that met their needs and allowed for dynamic modeling of development patterns on campus.

Steps used to meet the company’s or institution’s objectives for the project

The project began with a brainstorming session with University parking and transportation directors. We used that information to define how the modeling parameters would be applied in the software and used several mid-project meetings to present and validate the modeling approaches.

Criteria used to evaluate your services

Direct testing of modeled scenarios, including adding new features to test the viability of a new modeled scenario.

Description of how this client demonstrates your expertise for this RFP

UW is one of our University Park+ users. Kimley-Horn is the only firm, to our knowledge, that provides an already established parking modeling platform. As one of the three minimum qualifications, this clearly demonstrates an expertise that only we can offer. Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

12

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Texas A&M Park+ Model, College Station, TX ‹‹Public University ‹‹Student Population: 56,256

Kimley-Horn is working with Texas A&M University (TAMU) to develop a Park+ scenario planning model for its primary campus in College Station, TX. The model development was part of a larger master planning study, intended to define and evaluate the feasibility of new parking structures on campus. The model was used to define existing and five-year deficiencies on campus and evaluate the location and orientation of new parking facilities. The new components of the Park+ model developed uniquely for TAMU included advanced latent demand mapping, enhanced multimodal evaluation, and parking permit restrictions.

Time frame of service

November 2011 – March 2012 (maintenance and on-call support is ongoing)

Problems encountered and how they were overcome

TAMU was a second generation Park + model tester. They were one of our first models to utilize a variety of data, including occupancy from their T2 system and permit sales, to predict parking demands. The calibration process required a balance of data verification and project team confirmation. The collaborative process between TAMU and Kimley-Horn overcame this issue.

Steps used to meet the company’s or institution’s objectives for the project Kimley-Horn Implemented the four-step modeling process: ‹‹Data Gathering ‹‹Assumption Development ‹‹Calibration ‹‹Scenario Projections

Criteria used to evaluate your services

We tested modeled scenarios against actual data.

Description of how this client demonstrates your expertise for this RFP

TAMU is one of our University Park+ users. Kimley-Horn is the only firm, to our knowledge, that provides an already established parking modeling platform. As one of the three minimum qualifications, this clearly demonstrates an expertise that only we can offer.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

13

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Missoula Parking Commission, Parking Supply/Demand Study and Parking Strategic Plan, Missoula, MT ‹‹Municipality As part of a larger downtown master planning project for the City of Missoula, MT Kimley-Horn project manager Dennis Burns conducted a comprehensive parking supply/demand assessment and strategic plan for the Missoula Parking Commission (MPC). The MPC was one of four major community funding partners for the larger downtown master plan and the development of a comprehensive and integrated parking strategic plan. As a component of the larger community plan was both practical and strategic in that it helped align the parking and transportation philosophies of all the downtown entities.

Time frame of service

2009 – 2013 (Current On-Call Services Agreement)

Problems encountered and how they were overcome

One issue identified was to overcome some distrust and negativity related to parking from a small, but very vocal contingency of local retailers. Fortunately, one of the local leaders of this group had become familiar with Kimley-Horn project manager Dennis Burns’ industry white papers which helped instill a mutual trust and eased the potential friction and building a sense of trust.

Steps used to meet the company’s or institution’s objectives for the project

A three-phased approach was used to conduct the parking program assessment and strategic plan. The first phase was focused on data collection and current program assessment. The second phase was primarily centered on community engagement both as a part of the larger downtown master planning efforts, but also specifically addressing emerging downtown master plan concepts (such as a “retail hot spot” idea). The third phase was the development of a Parking and Transportation Strategic Plan with nine primary action items supplemented by more than 100 secondary action items.

Criteria used to evaluate your services

One of the major outcomes of this study was a recommendation to build a 300 – 400 space parking garage to support the “retail hot spot” area. This project was designed, built, and opened in spring 2013. The Missoula Integrated Parking and Transportation Plan was recognized from the International Downtown Association.

Description of how this client demonstrates your expertise for this RFP

This successful project illustrates our effective and creative parking and transportation planning experience. Having a strong working knowledge of not only university/campus dynamics, but also municipal parking management is critical to framing successful town/gown relationships.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

14

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Arizona State University & Tempe Park+ Model, Tempe, AZ ‹‹Public University ‹‹Student Population: 59,382

Kimley-Horn is working with Arizona State University (ASU) to develop a Park+ scenario planning tool for its downtown Tempe, campus. The model will be the first Park+ tool to evaluate the municipal and university realms together, as it includes both the campus uses and downtown Tempe uses. The model development includes data collection, GIS database development, presentations to administration, and the development of the core Park+ model. New components of the Park+ model developed uniquely for ASU included a financial evaluations enhanced reporting, and output features to provide data from the Park+ model to the campus mobile website application.

Time frame of service

October 2012 – July 2013 (maintenance and on-call support is ongoing)

Problems encountered and how they were overcome

ASU was a second generation Park + model tester. Because they had very little defined ArcGIS data for their campus, the Kimley-Horn team developed both land use and parking information from scratch. We worked closely with several departments on the ASU campus to match actual conditions to the databases we developed.

Steps used to meet the company’s or institution’s objectives for the project Kimley-Horn Implemented the four-step modeling process: ‹‹Data Gathering ‹‹Assumption Development ‹‹Calibration ‹‹Scenario Projections

Criteria used to evaluate your services

We tested modeled scenarios against actual data.

Description of how this client demonstrates your expertise for this RFP

ASU is one of our University Park+ users. Kimley-Horn is the only firm, to our knowledge, that provides an already established parking modeling platform. As one of the three minimum qualifications, this clearly demonstrates an expertise that only we can offer.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

15

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Project Management Project Team Structure/Internal Controls The organizational chart below outlines our well-qualified team in the disciplines necessary to successfully complete your plan.

Project Team Organization

L. Dennis Burns, CAPP

Dean Penny, P.E.

Principal-In-Charge/Project Manager

QA/QC

Brett Wood, P.E. Assistant Project Manager Parking Demand Modeling

John Coons, AIA, NCARP, LEED AP Campus Planning Advisory

Curtis Rowe, P.E., PTOE Transportation and Traffic Engineering

Vanessa K. Solesbee, MA Parking Planning, Implementation Strategies, Community Engagement

Sanjay Pandya, P.E. Assistant Project Manager Parking Design/Site Assessment (Washington State P.E. # 45478)

Kevin Kimm, P.E.

Jeffery Smith, P.E., LEED AP

Structural Design

Transportation/ TDM

Casey Jones, CAPP, MPA Parking Operations, Special Events Management

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

16

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Staff Qualifications/Experience Ultimately, it is the people, the professionals who serve you, who are most important to the successful completion of any project. With this in mind, we selected a technically qualified person, L. Dennis Burns, to manage an outstanding team of professionals and to serve as the project manager. Dennis has managed many similar projects. He will be personally involved in all aspects, serving as the primary point of contact for WSU.

L. Dennis Burns, CAPP — Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager ‹‹40% availability to work on this project

Professional Credentials

‹‹Certified Administrator of Public Parking – IPI/University of Virginia ‹‹Bachelor of Arts, Humanities/Psychology, University of North Carolina – Charlotte ‹‹Graduate Program, Counseling, University of North Carolina – Charlotte ‹‹International Downtown Association – Board of Directors ‹‹IPI – Council of Advisors ‹‹NPA ‹‹Pacific and Intermountain Parking & Transportation Association ‹‹Southwest Parking Association ‹‹California Public Parking Association

Special Qualifications

Dennis is a nationally-recognized parking expert with over 28 years of parking consulting and management experience. He has practical, hands-on management experience in university, municipal, and airport environments. This direct parking management experience allows him to understand functional and operations issues from the customer’s perspective. In the past five years, Dennis has focused on municipal parking programs and business district development as an area of special expertise. He has also lead national research and analysis efforts in the areas of parking system organizational development, parking as an economic development strategy, parking system strategic planning, parking and transportation program integration, and parking system branding/marketing.

Special Recognition

In 2010, Mr. Burns was honored as the International Parking Institute’s “Parking Professional of the Year.” In the same year, Mr. Burns was invited by the White House to be a speaker at the first “Green Gov Symposium” held on the campus of the George Washington University in Washington, DC. The topic of his presentation was “Beyond the Commute.” The International Parking Institute recruited Mr. Burns to lead a national webinar in August of 2010 on the topic of “Emerging Trends in Parking System Monetization.” Mr. Burns was also invited to speak at the “Symposium for Urban Space Management” held in Maringa, Parana, Brazil in September 2010. In 2007, Mr. Burns was invited to address the International Downtown Association’s “Caribbean Summit” held in Curacao, on the topic of “Advanced Urban Transportation and Parking Solutions.”

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

17

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

In 2006, Mr. Burns led an international panel on the topic of “Integrated Access Management Strategies In Urban Environments” at the International Downtown Association and Europe’s Association of Town Centre Managers “World Congress” held in New York City.

Relevant Experience

Some of the projects listed below were completed prior to joining Kimley-Horn. Western Technical College, Parking Demand Model and Parking Management Study, La Crosse, WI – Project Manager University of Washington, Campus Mobility and Supply/Demand Study, Seattle, WA – Project Manager Medical University of South Carolina, Parking Technology Assessment, Charleston, SC – Project Manager Clemson University, Parking and Transportation Master Plan, Clemson, SC – Project Manager University of North Carolina Parking Supply/Demand Analysis, Charlotte, NC – Project Manager Cal Poly University, Campus Access & Mobility Study, San Luis Obispo, CA – Project Manager Old Dominion University, Parking and Transportation Master Plan, Norfolk, VA – Project Manager Arizona State University, Parking Master Plan Update, Tempe, AZ – Project Manager Arizona State University, South Campus Lot Design Tempe, AZ – Project Manager Arizona State University, East Campus Parking Program Review, Tempe, AZ – Project Manager Virginia Commonwealth University, Parking Operations Assessment and Management Training, Richmond, VA – Project Manager North Carolina State University, Parking Allocation and Management Strategies, Raleigh, NC – Project Manager Duke University/Cousins Properties, Inc., Central Campus Master Plan, Durham, NC – Project Manager College of Charleston, Parking Functional Design Review & Management Analysis, Charleston, SC – Project Manager Collins College, Supply/Demand and Zoning Requirement Study, Tempe, AZ – Project Manager Virginia Tech, Parking and Transit Master Plan Blacksburg, VA – Project Manager Arizona State University Parking and Transit Development Plan East, Mesa, AZ – Project Manager Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ – Parking and Transit Master Plan – Project Manager Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC – Lighting Study – Project Manager State University of West Georgia, Parking Lot Design, Carrollton, GA – Project Manager Kennesaw State University, Parking Master Plan, Kennesaw, GA – Project Manager

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

18

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Brett Wood, P.E., CAPP — Assistant Project Manager/Parking Demand Modeling ‹‹30% availability to work on this project

Professional Credentials

‹‹Master of Science, Civil Engineering, University of Alabama ‹‹Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of Alabama ‹‹Professional Engineer in AZ and NC ‹‹Certified Administrator of Public Parking ‹‹Southwest Parking Association – Vice President/President-Elect ‹‹International Parking Institute – Advisory Council

Special Qualifications

Brett provides nearly 10 years of experience in parking and transportation planning, with a strategic focus in parking, including management, pricing, operations, and technology strategies to help improve the overall parking experience. Recently, Brett led the development of the Park+ management modeling application, ensuring that the theories and principles of smart growth, transportation planning, and parking management are accurately captured in each Park+ model. Brett developed Kimley-Horn’s original parking demand model and has been the project leader for all of the firm’s parking demand modeling efforts, including TAMU, UW, ASU, CSU, and many more. With an extensive background in transportation and community planning, Brett understands the relationship between parking demands and the management of general transportation demands and the community at large. Brett has led the strategic planning process for communities and regional areas throughout the United States, with parking planning work for the municipalities of Charlotte, NC; Atlanta, GA; Seattle, WA; Phoenix, AZ; Minneapolis, MN; Houston, TX; Dallas, TX; Salt Lake City, UT, and many more.

Relevant Experience

Arizona State University Park+ Software Application, Tempe, AZ – Project Manager University of Washington Park+ Software Application, Seattle, WA – Project Manager Texas A&M Park+ Software Application, College Station, TX – Project Manager Colorado State University Park+ Software Application, Fort Collins, CO – Project Manager Beverly Hills Park+ Software Application, Beverly Hills, CA – Project Manager Downtown Atlanta Parking Assessment, Atlanta, GA – Project Manager Tempe Downtown Strategic Parking Plan 2010, Tempe, AZ – Project Manager Houston Museum District Park+ Software Application, Houston, TX – Project Manager Charlotte Center City Curb Lane Management Study, Charlotte, NC – Project Manager Seattle Performance-Based Parking Pricing Feasibility Study, Seattle, WA – Assistant Project Manager Seattle On-Street Parking Program Communications Plan, Seattle, WA – Project Manager City of Phoenix On-Street Parking Study, Phoenix, AZ – Project Manager Minneapolis Curbside Strategic Framework, Minneapolis, MN – Project Manager Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

19

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Sanjay Pandya, P.E. — Assistant Project Manager /Parking Design/ Site Assessment ‹‹40% availability to work on this project

Professional Credentials

‹‹Master of Science, Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ‹‹Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ‹‹Professional Engineer in WA, CA, OR, and IL

Special Qualifications

Sanjay has more than 26 years of project management and structural engineering experience providing consulting and design services. For 16 of these 26 years, he was involved in the planning and design of new parking facilities and evaluation and restoration of existing parking facilities. He has led teams in the design of new parking structures for a variety of clients including municipalities, private developers, hospitals, and universities. Sanjay has also managed numerous parking consulting services projects including parking supply/demand, parking structure site feasibility studies, and parking structure functional design development.

Relevant Experience

SVBX Station Campuses, Roadways, and Parking Facilities (D720 Design project), Santa Clara County, CA – Project Engineer Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project, Phase 1, San Diego, CA –Project Engineer Broadway Plaza Master Plan and Peer Review, Walnut Creek, CA – Project Engineer Colorado State University Parking and Transportation Study, Fort Collins, CO – Project Engineer

John A. Coons, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP — Campus Planning Advisor ‹‹40% availability to work on this project

Professional Credentials

‹‹Master of Architecture, University of New Mexico, School of Architecture and Planning ‹‹Boston Architectural Center ‹‹Bachelor of Arts, Art, Bowdoin College (with Honors) ‹‹Liceo Classico Manzoni, Milan, Italy ‹‹Professional Architect in CA, AZ, NV, and MA ‹‹LEED Professional

Special Qualifications

John has more than 30 years of experience in the programming, planning, and design of a wide range of project types for public, private, and corporate clients across the United States. Providing senior leadership in client outreach, strategic team building and design integration, John has led multiple college and university planning and design efforts. His inclusive, interdisciplinary approach has resulted in numerous higher education projects notable for their contextual sensitivity, programmatic responsiveness, economy, commitment to sustainability, and award-winning design quality.

Relevant Experience

Some of the projects listed below were completed prior to joining Kimley-Horn. Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

20

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Los Angeles Pierce College, Master Plan Update, Woodland Hills, CA – Project Manager Mount St. Mary’s College Master Plan, Los Angeles, CA – Project Manager LAC+USC Master Plan, Los Angeles, CA – Project Manager California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, Campus Master Plan, Pomona, CA – Project Manager Los Angeles Pierce College, 2000 Master Plan, Woodland Hills, CA – Project Manager Brigham Young University Student Housing Master Plan, Provo UT – Project Manager University of California, Davis Memorial Union Master Plan, Davis, CA – Project Manager University of California, Irvine East Campus Master Plan, Irvine, CA – Project Manager

Curtis Rowe, P.E., PTOE — Transportation and Traffic Engineer ‹‹40% availability to work on this project

Professional Credentials

‹‹Master of Science, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Las Vegas ‹‹Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln ‹‹Professional Engineer in CO, NE, NV, and WY ‹‹Professional Traffic Operations Engineer ‹‹Institute of Transportation Engineers

Special Qualifications

With 19 years of experience, Curtis serves as project manager on a variety of transportation engineering projects for public and private sector clients. Curtis’ experience encompasses traffic impact studies, corridor studies, traffic signal design, access and circulation studies, intersection capacity analysis, traffic signal warrant studies, roundabout design, signing and marking, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) design, transportation planning, and transportation demand management programs. Curtis is proficient in AutoCAD, HCS, Synchro™, SimTraffic, and Sidra programs. He brings to our team his experience combining transportation planning, traffic engineering, and design into a cohesive package.

Relevant Experience

University of Colorado Anschutz Inpatient Pavilion Expansion Traffic Impact Study, Aurora, CO – Project Engineer University of Colorado Hospital Colfax Avenue (US-40) Access Study, Aurora, CO – Project Engineer Illinois Street Closure between 14th Street and 16th Street Closure Study Colorado School of Mines Transportation Studies, Golden, CO – Project Engineer Maple Street and 16th Street Closure Traffic Study, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO – Project Engineer West Campus Road Parking Structure Traffic Study, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO – Project Engineer UNLV Maryland Parkway Pedestrian Crossing Evaluation, University of Nevada Las Vegas – Project Engineer Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

21

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Kevin Kimm, P.E. — Structural Design ‹‹40% availability to work on this project

Professional Credentials

‹‹Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Montana State University ‹‹IPI ‹‹Professional Engineer in AZ, CA and NC

Special Qualifications

Kevin Kimm specializes in parking design and structural engineering—bringing over 12 years of experience as an engineer and project manager in this field. His expertise in parking spans a wide range of projects, ranging from parking deck location studies to parking deck functional design and review to parking deck final structural design, including construction administration on multiple parking deck projects. Kevin’s experience also includes parking demand modeling and strategic parking planning. His design experience includes structures of reinforced concrete, precast/pre-stressed concrete, cast-in-place post-tensioned concrete, and structural steel. Kevin has worked with parking clients that include healthcare facilities, universities, municipalities and private developers. Kevin also is experienced in parking deck rehabilitation and repair projects.

Relevant Experience

Carl T Hayden VA Medical Center Parking Garage, Phoenix, AZ – Parking Desing Lead City of Whitefish Parking Garages Project, Whitefish, MT – Parking and Structural Design Hotel Del Coronado Master Plan Update, San Diego, CA – Project Manager Richmond Transit Village Parking Garage, Richmond, CA – Project Engineer Rex Hospital Medical Office Building Parking Deck Expansion, Raleigh, NC – Project Engineer UNC-Chapel Hill, Jackson Circle Parking Deck, NC – Project Engineer Downtown Underground Parking Facility, Raleigh, NC – Project Engineer NCSU, Coliseum Parking Deck Expansion, Raleigh, NC – Project Engineer Port of San Diego Parking Structure Feasibility Study, San Diego, CA – Project Engineer North Carolina State University West Lot Parking Deck, Raleigh, NC – Project Engineer Saint John Street Parking Garage (Renaissance Park), Spartanburg, SC – Project Engineer Blueline Trolley Station Improvements, San Diego, CA – Project Engineer Triangle Transit Authority Rail Station Design Services, Research Triangle region, NC – Project Engineer Arizona Biltmore Parking Structure, Phoenix, AZ – Project Engineer

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

22

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Jeffrey Smith, P.E., LEED AP — Transportation Planning/TDM Specialist ‹‹30% availability to work on this project

Professional Credentials

‹‹Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology ‹‹Professional Engineer in Georgia ‹‹Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) ‹‹Accredited Professional ‹‹Association for Commuter Transportation ‹‹Congress for New Urbanism ‹‹Institute of Transportation Engineers ‹‹Pedestrians Educating Drivers on Safety

Special Qualifications

Jeffrey offers eight years of experience in transportation planning and traffic operations projects for public and private sector clients. He specializes in campus planning, bicycle/pedestrian planning, and transportation demand management. Jeffrey additionally is skilled in AutoCAD, Highway Capacity Software, Synchro, and ArcGIS.

Relevant Experience

ARC, Regional Transportation Demand Management Plan, various regions, GA – Project Manager Atlanta Downtown Multi-Modal Passenger Terminal Master Plan, Atlanta, GA – Project Engineer Atlanta Regional Commission, North Fulton Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Atlanta, GA – Project Engineer Buckhead Village Complete Streets Plan, Atlanta, GA – Project Manager City of Dunwoody, Dunwoody Village Parkway Bike and Pedestrian Improvements, Dunwoody, GA – Project Engineer City of Sandy Springs, City Center Master Plan and LCI Update, Sandy Springs, GA – Project Manager Coca-Cola Headquarters Master Plan, Atlanta, GA – Project Engineer Perimeter CIDs, Multimodal Transportation Plan, Dunwoody, GA – Project Engineer Ponce City Market (formerly known as City Hall East), Atlanta, GA – Project Engineer Southern Polytechnic State University, Transportation System Master Plan, Marietta, GA – Project Manager

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

23

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Vanessa K. Solesbee, MA — (Solesbee)Parking Planning, Implementation Strategies Community Engagement ‹‹30% availability to work on this project

Professional Credentials

‹‹Senator Gregory A. Luna Memorial Fellow, 2003 ‹‹IPI, Parking Matters Committee & Advisory Board, 2011-2013 ‹‹Leadership for Five Seasons, Class of 2011-2012 ‹‹Corridor Business Journal “Woman of Influence”, 2012

Special Qualifications

Vanessa is an executive level professional with experience in non-profit management, organizational leadership, communications/marketing, project management, stakeholder relations/advocacy, and public policy. She is the founder and President of Solesbee, a woman-owned firm focused on helping communities develop, market, and implement downtown revitalization initiatives with a special focus on creating innovative public/private partnerships and parking master plan implementation.

Relevant Experience

City of Wheat Ridge, Parking Strategic Plan Update, Wheat Ridge, CO – Expert Panelist City of Fort Collins, Midtown Urban Design Plan, Fort Collins, CO – Stakeholder Engagement Houston Parking Management Strategic Plan, Houston, TX – Expert Panelist Colorado State University Parking and Transportation Study, Ft. Collins, CO – Stakeholder Engagement Sandusky Main Street, Parking Strategic Plan Sandusky, OH – Assistant Project Manager Park Cedar Rapids Master Services Agreement, Cedar Rapids, IA – Strategic Marketing Plan, Organizational Development

Casey Jones, CAPP — (Standard Parking) Parking Operations, Special Events Management ‹‹30% availability to work on this project

Professional Credentials

‹‹International Parking Institute - Board of Directors (2006-2010), Board Chair (current) ‹‹Pacific Intermountain Parking & Transportation Association - Founding President (20052009), Immediate Past President (2008-2010), Board of Directors (2005-2010) ‹‹Rocky Mountain Chapter, Association for Commuter Transportation, Board Member (2008-present) ‹‹Community Transportation Association of Idaho (2010-present)

Special Qualifications

Casey is an industry leader in the promotion and development of sustainable transportation solutions. His work demonstrates innovation, quality analysis, and strategic leadership. His efforts to integrate parking and transportation demand management reflect the best approach to efficiently solving the parking and transport problems facing individual facilities and communities.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

24

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Casey is a successful public sector executive experienced in high-level leadership in transportation, parking, transportation planning, and parking operations.

Relevant Experience

University of Washington Parking & Transportation Operations, WA – Consultant University of Oregon Consulting, OR – Consultant Boston University Parking Operations, MA – Consultant Camden County College Parking Operations, NJ – Consultant Case Western Reserve University Parking & Transportation Operations, OH – Consultant Cincinnati State Parking Operations, OH – Consultant Cleveland State University Transportation Operations, OH – Consultant Columbia University Parking Operations, NY – Consultant DePaul University Parking Operations, IL – Consultant Harvard Medical School Parking Operations, MA – Consultant Johnson & Wales University, Charlotte Parking Operations, FL – Consultant LaGuardia Community College Parking Operations, NJ – Consultant Louisiana State University Consulting, LA – Consultant Massachusetts Institute of Technology Parking & Transportation Operations, MA – Consultant

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

25

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

References Joshua N. Kavanagh

Melinda A. Helton CAPP

Director, Transportation Services University of Washington 3745 15th Ave. NE Box 355360 Seattle, WA 98105 P: (206) 685-1567 F: (206) 685-9289 M: (206) 427-2958 E: [email protected]

Director ASU Parking and Transit Services Arizona State University P.O. Box 875205 Tempe, AZ 85287-5205 P: (480) 965-5994 F: (480) 965-0712 M: (480) 495-6026 E: [email protected]

Anne P. Guest

Randy Hensley

Director Missoula Parking Commission 128 West Main Street Missoula, Montana 59802 P: (406) 552-6250 F: n/a M: (406) 546-4932 E: [email protected]

Parking Services Manager City of Fort Collins P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 P: (970) 416-2058 F: (970) 221-6239 E: [email protected]

Peter W. Lange

Parking Services Director Colorado State University 1508 Center Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80523-6012 O: (970) 491-1515 D: (970)491-7041 M: (303) 349-3442 F: n/a E: [email protected]

Executive Director Transportation Texas A&M University 1250 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-1250 Delivery Address: 702 University Drive E, Bldg. E College Station, TX 77840-1805 P: (979) 845-9700 F: n/a E: [email protected]

Dave Bradford

Additional Detail (Optional) We have included additional information about our Park+ modeling program in the Other Items tab of this submittal.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

26

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Project Approach/Methodology Overview/Goals and Objectives

The overall goal of this project is to assist Washington State University (WSU) by developing a comprehensive transportation and parking plan to support and advance the objectives of 2012 Campus Master Plan Update. The comprehensive transportation and parking plan will function as a blueprint for parking and transportation planning and policy development for the next five to 10 years. The RFP document identifies six primary objectives for the WSU Transportation Plan. These include: 1. To serve as a planning, management, and policy document for campus transportation and parking. 2. Reduce the travel of automobiles in the core campus to increase safety for pedestrians and other forms of active transportation. 3. Create an environment that focuses on the use of active transportation and other mobility options. 4. Plan for the connection of a future on-campus shuttle system to other regional and local transit systems. 5. Provide a dynamic parking demand/price model for forecasting revenue and demand for future parking needs based on University growth estimates and planned capital projects, and for accurately pricing the true cost of parking replacement due to displacement by capital projects. 6. Incorporate access needs for maintenance and service vehicles and consideration for snow removal and storage in any recommendation. The remainder of this approach/methodology defines how we intend to address these six objectives and perform the WSU Parking and Transportation Master plan

Study Area

The study area is primarily focused on the WSU Main Campus Planning area. Using the 2012 Campus Master Plan Update as a base, the area defined in the graphic to the right identifies the general study area. We will refine the study area in collaboration with WSU staff and determine if the “focus areas” of the campus master plan map also make sense as “analysis zones” for the comprehensive transportation plan or if a different of parking and transportation sub-areas/zones makes more sense. Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

27

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Project Methodology

The following sections provide our general approach to the project, including Parking System Management, Long Term Parking System Strategy, Park+ Modeling Application Development, Parking Alternative Design/Operations, and Traffic Impact Analysis/Campus Cordon Assessment.

Parking System Management

In an effort to minimize the need for development of new parking capacity, the examination of parking system management will be based on a “systems approach”. Under this approach, multiple aspects of system management are examined to ensure that the utilization and benefit of existing parking resources are maximized. The following is a list of specific areas for review. This list will be reviewed and discussed with WSU staff and discussed. It is likely that additional items will also be identified for further assessment. ‹‹Document and assess current parking management policies and programs. ‹‹Evaluate current utilization based on the vehicle occupancy and campus population information developed through the field surveys. ‹‹Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of current parking resource allocation policies. ‹‹Review previous campus parking demand assessments as well as the campus vision as stated in the 2012 Campus Master Plan Update. ‹‹Evaluate the impacts of proposed campus development building projects and the associated loss of existing parking resources. ‹‹Develop a recommended ratio of population to parking spaces to ensure adequate parking for faculty/staff, resident students, commuter students, visitors, and services vehicles. ‹‹Develop a set of campus access management “Guiding Principles” that are aligned with the larger institution’s vision and mission. ‹‹Explore a variety of parking resource allocation strategies. ‹‹Provide an overview assessment of current parking management practices and the use of new technology. ‹‹Perform a surface lot efficiency review and expansion options analysis. ‹‹Evaluate accessible parking and pedestrian access strategies to be compliant with new Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines. ‹‹Recommendations and a pros/cons analysis of other university parking allocation models. ‹‹Provide a draft implementation strategy for the recommended model. ‹‹Examination of current parking facility efficiency including: zz General configuration zz Parking geometrics appropriate to current mix of vehicle sizes zz Design flexibility for adjusting to future changes in vehicle sizes zz Additional spaces gained through reconfiguration of parking layouts zz Identify control issues that may be compromising the parking allocation program or efficient use of existing parking facilities zz Evaluate enforcement policies and practices in terms of their effect on efficient parking utilization and support of parking resource allocations. zz Examine options for remote parking, including: zz If on-site, the most appropriate location based on long-range campus land use plan zz Accessibility for inbound parkers Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

28

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

zz Distance from campus and campus destinations zz Walking environment (if in reasonable proximity to some campus destinations) zz Transportation accessibility and routes zz Viability of off-campus park-and-ride alternatives with shuttle services ‹‹Parking Management Program Review zz Based on evaluating numerous parking systems of various sizes and complexity, Kimley-Horn has identified a set of twenty characteristics, that when combined into an integrated programmatic approach can provide the basis for a sound and well managed parking system. Our parking management review will be based on this “20 Characteristics” approach.

Park+ Modeling Application

For the application of the Park+ model on the WSU campus, Kimley-Horn proposes the following general approach: Initial Project Kickoff Meeting – Kimley-Horn will meet with parking and transportation staff on campus to discuss modeling parameters and assumptions. Kimley-Horn will also meet with GIS and IS staff to discuss implementation of the model and available data for model development. Kimley-Horn staff will also conduct a field tour of the campus to determine specific modeling patterns and relationships between parking and campus uses. Initial Data Request and Collection – Kimley-Horn will submit a data request to staff, including requests for GIS data (campus uses and parking), transit ridership and mode split surveys, special event parameters, and future planned building and development on campus. Kimley-Horn will review the data develop a data collection plan to collect any additional data needed to build the modeling platform. Data collection can be conducted in coordination with the initial kickoff meeting or at a separate time. Parking occupancy data collection can either be provided from historical surveys, campus revenue control equipment or parking management software, or field counts. If Kimley-Horn needs to collect parking occupancy data, we will utilize License Plate Recognition (LPR) equipment to collect data more efficiently. Database Development – Kimley-Horn will create specific GIS databases for use in the Park+ model collected based on the campus use and parking data. The databases will be structured in ArcGIS shapefiles and compiled into file geodatabases for use in the modeling platform. Model Development – Kimley-Horn will develop a Park+ modeling platform for WSU’s campus based on the actual campus conditions. The model will include modules that allow for the analysis of new campus buildings and/or changes to university population. The model will include standard modules for pricing, special events, parking management, and mode split analysis. Additional modules can be developed at the University’s request during the scope and negotiation phase of this procurement. Scenario Evaluation – Kimley-Horn will use the calibrated Park+ model to analyze various scenarios related to potential campus build-out and modifications, including master plan analyses and scenarios associated with the recommendations of the overall transportation and parking master planning efforts. Scenarios will be delivered with the modeling platform upon completion. Training and Installation – Kimley-Horn will deliver the Park+ model near the end of the master plan project. It will include including installation files and instructions for the University and a one day training period that covers the use, operation, installation, maintenance, and ongoing support for the modeling platform. Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

29

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Long-Term Parking System Strategy

Using the a combination of the Park+ modeling application, stakeholder outreach, and the evaluation of existing conditions, Kimley-Horn will evaluate long-term campus parking needs on campus, including: ‹‹Examine long-term campus development plans, in terms of strategies already in place for growth, protection of green space, pedestrian connections, and parking access. ‹‹Determine future parking sufficiency by user group and campus area before factoring Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures. ‹‹Evaluate the effect of planned availability and promotion of alternate transportation modes on parking sufficiency (modal split assessment). ‹‹Evaluate expansion or additional implementation of TDM strategies, such as infrastructure enhancements for transportation alternatives, facility space planning alternatives, and TDM program monitoring, etc. ‹‹Evaluate parking pricing changes and models (using Park+) ‹‹Estimate capital costs associated with the development of new lots/structures, including design costs, construction costs, financing costs, etc. ‹‹Model the impacts to parking or other fees based on the recommended parking program in order to ensure that parking is self-funded. ‹‹Provide projected revenues and expenses associated with recommended alternatives, including recurring maintenance and operating expenses. ‹‹Develop parking needs projections five and 10 years into the future, applying developed parking demand ratios to future campus development plans to predict future parking capacity needs. ‹‹Compare projections of future parking demand, by user group and campus location, to evaluate sufficiency of planned parking capacity in the 2012 Campus Master Plan Update. ‹‹Evaluate strategic issues and concepts including: zz Concentrated vs. dispersed parking zz Centrally located parking within convenient walking distances vs. peripheral intercept parking with appropriate transportation, including multimodal connections zz A “transportation spine“ concept utilizing a transportation corridor system zz Concentrated parking “nodes“ located near destinations zz Parking replacement policies needed to sustain parking capacity zz Retention of campus green space zz Evaluation of current parking and transportation fees zz Operational benchmarks based on a comparative survey of other peer university campuses ‹‹Determine the fee structures necessary to support future parking and transportation development/operation, including phasing of any recommended fee increases. ‹‹Analyze and recommend possible locations for new parking structures, including provisions for additional parking services office space. ‹‹Examine personnel requirements, organizational structure, and organizational functions, recommending any changes that may be appropriate to supporting the long-term needs of the University and the comprehensive transportation plan.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

30

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Parking Alternatives - Design/Operation

In addition to management and operational strategies, Kimley-Horn will evaluate parking facilities on campus, including: ‹‹Identify a potential alternative parking solutions and locations. ‹‹ Review of current standards for signage, security, and patron information utilized by the University. ‹‹Develop parking facility options focusing on patron comfort and accessibility. ‹‹Develop options for multi-use facilities and development of preliminary construction budgets and identify pros and cons of each option for University review. ‹‹Review of current fiscal capability of the University for construction funding. ‹‹Review local, regional and university peer parking rates. Develop proposed rate schedules to support overall program development and implementation. ‹‹Review long-term development plans and develop concurrent long-term parking strategies accordingly. ‹‹Provide a financial analysis on any recommended options, to include: zz Estimates of construction costs of any recommended facilities zz Estimated design and professional services costs zz Estimated financing costs zz Estimated annual debt service costs

Transportation System and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program Analysis

A major focus of this plan will be the development of a comprehensive “access management” program that will help create a balanced and sustainable parking and transportation program. This assessment will include a detailed review of the current campus transportation system and existing TDM and Transportation Alternatives Programs. It will also include a limited assessment of the Pullman Transit System in terms of programs, costs, services levels and system capacities.

Community Education, Outreach and Strategic Communication Plan Development

Kimley-Horn, in association with The Solesbee Group, will provide a review of current program communications and engage the campus community in a series of outreach strategies to assess perceptions and behaviors relative to transportation and parking. We will work collaboratively with WSU staff to develop a campus transportation survey. A detailed analysis of campus transportation survey results will be provided and will feed into the development of a set transportation and parking strategic communications options for use beyond the study.

Traffic Impact Analysis and Campus Cordon Study

Kimley-Horn will conduct a campus-wide traffic analysis to help define transportation recommendations to help define strategies and alternatives to reduce congestion and improve campus circulation and pedestrian/bike safety. This assessment includes the following tasks: ‹‹Conduct field surveys utilizing a video capture methodology of key campus intersections to document intersection utilization for all modes (vehicles, busses, bikes and pedestrians). ‹‹Develop a comprehensive level of service evaluation for all intersections. ‹‹Project future intersection levels of service based on proposed campus development. ‹‹Create a campus traffic simulation model for use in future campus planning work. ‹‹Address transit improvements including:

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

31

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

zz What route modifications, headway reductions or other service improvements show promise in increasing ridership? What new routes might be necessary to serve concentrations of students, faculty, or staff? Fifteen-minute headways are generally necessary to attract a large number of riders with a choice of modes. For example, increased headways and bi-directional service at Arizona State University increased ridership dramatically. zz Where might enhanced service spans be appropriate, for example a new night service? Many campuses have routes that stop as early as 6:00 pm, which may be too early for a campus with significant evening activity. zz What adjustments can be made without increasing service hours? For example, many transit systems have routes that consist of one-way loops, which provide good coverage but are unattractive to many potential riders since they may have to travel around the entire loop to get back to their destination. There may also be the potential to adjust schedules on some routes to provide higher effective frequencies between the campus core and downtown. zz Assessing potential new routes and coverages based on changes to local housing density and connecting transit routes to major parking collector points can help promote a “pedestrian first” approach. ‹‹Address bicycle and pedestrian improvements including: zz What routes are most in need of improvement? zz Are there adequate crossing facilities to promote bicyclist and pedestrian safety? zz Are new routes needed? zz Is signage adequate? zz Is there enough secure, covered bicycle parking? Is it in the right places? zz Are facilities such as lockers and showers available? zz Do all local transit busses have bike racks?

Project Deliverables

Based on the following five focus areas, Kimley-Horn proposes a variety of deliverables for WSU, each providing a component that makes up the overall parking and transportation master plan. From a high level perspective, this project will be organized into five major phases with supporting key task areas. The following summarizes key project deliverables by project phase/task:

Phase One: Parking System Analysis Key Tasks:

‹‹Parking Supply/Demand Study/Park+ Model ‹‹Parking Program Management Review ‹‹Peer University Survey ‹‹Parking Facility Condition Appraisals (Optional Task) ‹‹Long-term Parking Strategy ‹‹Parking Alternatives – Design/Financial Assessment Phase One Deliverables: ‹‹Parking Supply/Demand Analysis Summary and Park+ Parking Demand Model ‹‹Park+ Model Training ‹‹Peer University Survey and Comparative Analysis ‹‹Long-term Parking Strategy Task Report ‹‹Parking Alternatives Assessment and Garage Conceptual Designs/Alternatives Analysis ‹‹Parking Facility Condition Assessment Report (Optional) Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

32

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Phase Two: Transportation System and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program Analysis Key Tasks: ‹‹Overview of Current Campus Transportation System ‹‹Review of Current TDM and Transportation Alternatives Programs ‹‹Limited Transit System Assessment ‹‹Transportation Program Enhancement Recommendations Phase Two Deliverables: ‹‹Current Transportation System Overview Summary ‹‹Assessment of Current TDM and Transportation Alternatives Programs ‹‹Review of Current Pullman Transit System Program ‹‹Future Transportation and TDM Needs Assessment and Recommendations Summary

Phase Three: Community Education, Outreach, and Strategic Communication Plan Development

Key Tasks: ‹‹Review of current program communications ‹‹Develop a campus transportation survey and series of campus community focus groups ‹‹Analyze a campus transportation survey results ‹‹Development of Transportation and Parking Strategic Communications Strategies Phase Three Deliverables: ‹‹Task report summarizing current program communications ‹‹Task report summarizing the campus community transportation and parking survey results/ analysis ‹‹Draft report and tools to support a transportation program strategic communications plan

Phase Four: Campus Traffic and Circulation Assessment

Key Tasks: ‹‹Review of 2012 Campus Master Plan Update campus circulation and proposed road closures ‹‹Traffic Impact Assessment – Key Intersection Counts (Vehicles, Busses, Bikes and Peds) ‹‹Traffic Impact Assessment – Special event traffic counts (if needed) ‹‹Campus Cordon Study – Identification of traffic volumes and types of vehicles entering and exiting the campus ‹‹Develop a campus traffic simulation model (Vissim Software) Phase Four Deliverables: ‹‹Task report on field surveys key campus intersections for all modes (vehicles, busses, bikes ,and pedestrians) including level of service evaluation for all intersections zz Actual video files of each intersection will also be provided to WSU (if requested) ‹‹Task report on future intersection levels of service based on proposed campus development zz Will also include special event traffic assessments (if requested) ‹‹Development of a campus traffic simulation model for use in future campus planning work

Phase Five: Recommendations Development/Draft and Final Reports Key Tasks: ‹‹Develop report summaries by major task ‹‹Develop an executive summary including primary action items list ‹‹Develop and submit draft report for WSU staff review and comment

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

33

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

‹‹Incorporate staff comments and issue final draft report ‹‹ Summarize final draft report into a PowerPoint presentation and present to key groups on campus Phase Five Deliverables: ‹‹Complete all section task reports noted above into an overall draft report ‹‹Develop a draft executive summary and preliminary recommendations document for presentation and discussion at a special on-site work session ‹‹Submit draft report, following review of draft report and preliminary recommendations for staff review and comment ‹‹Incorporate staff comments and submit final draft report

Work Plan and Community Outreach

Planned dialogue with WSU administration, parking and transportation staff, University facilities and planning staff, and other appropriate university departments is the key to our approach. At the onset, we will meet with representatives designated by WSU to clarify the initial objectives for the project. This clarification of objectives will provide direction for the initial scope of work. The project team will meet periodically with WSU representatives, to verify data and review preliminary drafts. Through this process, representatives of WSU will have an opportunity to provide feedback to the Kimley-Horn project team. It will also provide an opportunity to further refine objectives or redirect the project-focus based on information developed during the early phases. This ensures that the project proceeds efficiently and the end product provides WSU with a document that is relevant, appropriate and will advance the objectives of the University. Ongoing and meaningful community input will be critical if the comprehensive transportation and parking plan is to garner the needed support and buy-in to be successfully implemented. Kimley-Horn believes in using the study process as an opportunity to educate key stakeholder groups to the complexity of parking planning and management. We propose a strong program of campus and local community outreach and feedback. Beyond the core staff groups typically involved in the planning process we recommend meeting with the following additional groups at a minimum: ‹‹University Student Government Representatives ‹‹Classified Personnel Council (or equivalent) ‹‹Administrative Professionals Council (or equivalent) ‹‹Faculty Council ‹‹City of Pullman ‹‹Neighborhood Associations bordering WSU The scope of work for the comprehensive transportation and parking plan is set out as a five-phased project. While most of these tasks are specific, they all relate to a central process that is directed at: ‹‹Evaluate campus parking and transportation needs. ‹‹Develop plan for meeting those needs - now and in the future.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

34

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

The central process generally addressed a core set of questions to provide a framework for addressing general campus planning issues and those that may be specific to WSU and its needs. These questions will be refined in the earliest stages of the project, but the following is a base set of core questions:

Core Questions

‹‹What are the existing campus components that are potential sources of parking demand? ‹‹What are the parking generation factors associated with the various campus components? ‹‹How much parking is needed to support the present campus components? ‹‹How much parking is available at present? ‹‹Is that parking in the right location to satisfy the needs of the various campus parking generators within acceptable walking distances for the users? ‹‹Can the existing parking resources be better managed to increase utilization? ‹‹Can parking demand be reduced by converting a greater portion of campus travel to alternate travel modes? ‹‹What is the best strategy for locating parking capacity in terms of the plan for land uses in the overall campus master plan and the vision of campus activity patterns? ‹‹What roles do alternate transportation modes currently play in reducing the demand for parking capacity and can the use of alternate transportation modes be increased in order to reduce parking demand? ‹‹What will be the impact of future campus growth, based on the specific future mix of components and the parking generation associated with that mix? ‹‹What impact do shared parking opportunities have on future parking demand? ‹‹What funding stream is needed to support the combination of parking and transit capacity needed to satisfy campus access requirements? ‹‹How can that funding be provided, given the options available to the University? ‹‹What traffic patterns constrain access to parking resources and how can the patterns be managed in accordance with University and City needs? ‹‹Which parking locations can capture traffic at the edges of campus and reduce conflicts with pedestrians and alternative modes? ‹‹What alternatives are available for parking access to limit conflicts with pedestrian paths? ‹‹Do potential parking development areas have natural geographic features conducive to interior/exterior ramping and/or at-grade entrance and exit access? ‹‹Directionally, where will the majority of the patrons be entering the campus, or specific proposed parking facilities? ‹‹Will future development in the general area place additional parking demands on proposed parking facilities? ‹‹Will future development adjacent to or near proposed parking facilities restrict potential future expansion of proposed parking facilities? ‹‹What are the current standards utilized by the University for security, wayfinding and patron information and what is the current response to their efficacy? ‹‹What is the current fiscal condition of the parking services department at the University? ‹‹How will the proposed facility construction/development costs be funded?

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

35

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Preliminary Project Schedule

Task B Task C (Optional) Task D Task E Phase 2 Tasks A - J

W ee k W 1ee 4 k W s5 ee - 8 k W s9 ee ks - 1 2 W 13 ee k -1 W 17 6 ee - 2 k 0 W s 21 ee ks -24 24 -2 6

ip tio n D es cr Parking Supply/Demand Study Parking Program Management Review Parking Facility Condition Appraisals (Optional Task) Long-term Parking Strategy Parking Alternatives – Design/Financial Assessment Transportation Analysis

Phase 3 Tasks A - E Community Education, Outreach, and Strategic Communication Plan Development Phase 4 Task A Traffic Impact Assessments Task B Campus Cordon Study (Optional) (Optional Task) Phase 5 Task A Task B Task C

Recommendations and Plan Development Draft Report Final Report and Presentation

Preliminary Project Schedule

Phase 1 Task A

Ta sk

Ta sk

Pr oj ec

tP ha se

Based on the proposed project we believe a six-month schedule to complete the Comprehensive Transportation Plan is adequate. Our team members are available to begin work within two weeks of your authorization to proceed.

= Preliminary estimate of on-site trips Note: Some of these trips will involve multiple staff

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

36

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Outcomes and Performance Measurements The intended impacts/outcomes of this study are to produce a comprehensive, strategic, and flexible transportation plan that the WSU Transportation Program will use for years to come. The plan will be the basis for aligning a new transportation and parking program work plan with the larger campus master plan goals and objectives. It is important to recognize the changing nature of campus development, the evolution of new technologies, and service requirements going forward. This study will also include a variety of flexible tools to help the transportation department adapt and remain highly responsive to changing campus environment. Examples of “flexible tools” include the Park+ GIS-based parking demand and campus access model which will provide the transportation department with the ability to track changes to parking supply, demand, land-use and modal split changes on an on-going basis in-house. Another dynamic tool is a full campus traffic simulation model that will for assess traffic impacts for a range of future campus development projects moving forward. Finally, a number of departmental communication strategies, tools, and media options will be provided. Three other key deliverables will specifically address on-going performance measurement and tracking. These include: a set of recommended parking operational benchmarks, a comprehensive program for defining targeted TDM program elements with specific demand reduction targets. This program contains a system for tracking and monitoring progress toward demand management targets as well as a process for making adjustments going forward if certain elements are not meeting preliminary demand reduction percentage goals. The final product focused on performance monitoring to create sustainable transportation program goals and benchmarks related to proposed “Triple Bottom Line” outcomes. Examples might include such elements as greenhouse gas emission targets, reductions in total vehicle miles traveled, progress toward modal split goals (by faculty/staff and students).

Risks Recent similar projects have produced no major risk areas. However, there are common risks associated with planning projects in general. Some of these risks and potential mitigation factors include: 1. “Project Scope Creep” a. As the project progresses, unanticipated issues can arise that are outside of the scope envisioned during the initial RFP specification process. i. Remedy: Having a well-defined scope of work (with well-defined deliverables) and having an effective process for on-going communication with the client’s project management team can identify potential “scope creep” issues as they arise. If it is determined that legitimate new scope elements are emerging and that it is appropriate to include them in the study, a mechanism for adding legitimate and approved scope elements is recommended. 2. Schedule Impacts a. On occasion, new campus development elements can be introduced that may need to be addressed prior to completing the normal course of the study. Or similarly, other projects can create issues that might interfere with data collection or other project tasks. The Kimley-Horn team has a track record of being flexible either in terms of modifying the original project schedule or providing additional resources to keep the project on-track.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

37

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Deliverables Our deliverables are included in the Project Approach/Methodology section of this submittal.

OMWBE Certification Our team does not include any team members that are certified as a OMWBE certified minority-owned firm and/or women-owned firm(s).

WIPHE Participation Other Institutions of Higher Education within the State of Washington, pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperative Act, RCW 39.3, may wish to participate in this contract. Other Institutions choosing to participate in any resultant contract will establish separate contracts with the successful Consultant using this agreement as the basis. Other Institutions are in no way bound to participate in this contract and Washington State University makes no guarantee regarding their participation. Indicate if this condition is agreeable Yes _X_ No ____

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

38

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

COST PROPOSAL

We propose to provide the base Comprehensive Transportation Planning services outlined herein on a fixed fee basis of $249,900, including reimbursable expenses estimated at $26,550.00. A detailed budget that includes proposed staff and two optional tasks is listed on the following pages.

Menu of Base Option Costs

Phase/Task Descriptions Cost Phase One: Parking Analysis $117,300.00 Task A - Parking Current Conditions Assessment $15,000.00 Task B - Parking Management Program Recommendations $8,000.00 Task C – Future Parking Demand /Long-Term Parking Strategy (Park+ Model) $78,570.00 Task D - Parking Alternatives - Design/Options/Financial Analysis $16,300.00 Phase Two: Transportation Analysis $41,500.00 Task A - Land Use/New Campus Development/Modal Split Analysis $5,000.00 Task B - Transit Assessment/Improvements $8,500.00 Task C - Bicycle and Pedestrian improvements $6,500.00 Task D - Parking Pricing Assessment $5,000.00 Task E – TDM and Other Transportation Demand Management Strategies $8,500.00 Task F - TDM Impact Monitoring System $4,500.00 Task G - Survey of University Transportation Sustainability Best Practices $3,500.00 Phase Three: Community Education, Outreach & Strategic Communications $15,000.00 Plan Development Task A - Campus community surveys and analysis $10,500.00 Task B - Draft Task Report Summary & Presentation $4,500.00 Phase Four: Project Management/Report Drafts/Meetings $25,500.00 Project Management and On-Site Visits $15,000.00 Draft Report Preparation $6,000.00 Final Report Summary Presentation $4,500.00 SUB-TOTAL – BASE OPTIONS: $199,870.00 Estimated Expenses (Included) $26,550.00 Optional Services Parking Facility Condition Assessment Report $18,000.00 IPI University Transportation and Parking Advisory Panel $20,000.00 Review of 2012 Master Plan Update campus circulation elements $4,000.00 Traffic Impact Assessment – Key Intersection Video Counts $13,600.00 Traffic Impact Assessment – Special event traffic counts $3,500.00 Campus Cordon Study Analysis $8,000.00 Development of a campus traffic simulation model (Vissum Software) $6,000.00 Development of a recommended “Strategic Communications Plan” $8,500.00 Sub-Total – Options: $81,600.00 Total – base + options: $281,470.00 Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

39

Phase 5 Task A Task B Task C

Phase 2 Phase 3

Phase Phase 1

Staff

Firm

8

2 4

2

400

20

60

60

$2,715

15

15

$14,200

100

20

80

$37,400

440

H. Brett Sanjay Kevin Jeffrey Curtis Technical Dean Wood Pandya Kimm Smith Rowe Staff Penny QA/ Demand Garage Structural TDM Traffic CADD/ QC Modeling Design Design Specialist Engineering Clerical 25% 30% 30% 20% 30% 25% 50% $295 $150 $230 $181 $142 $187 $85 Estimated Hours by Task 380 440

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

$44,270 $2,360 $60,000 $13,800

190

Labor Hrs. / Staff Labor Fee / Staff

24 16 20

16

40

4

40

10

20

L. Dennis Burns PM/ PIC 35% 233

Recommendations and Plan Dev. Draft Report Final Report and Presentation

Role/Expertise Overall Availability During Term of Contract Billing Rates – Hourly Tasks Description Task A Parking Supply/Demand Study Task B Parking Program Management Review Task C Long-term Parking Strategy Task D Parking Alternatives – Design/ Financial Assessment Tasks A - J Transportation Analysis Tasks A - E Community Education, Outreach and Strategic Communication Plan Development

Project Staff Hours, Labor Costs and Availability Matrix by Task

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

40

Phase 5 Task A Task B Task C

Phase 2 Phase 3

Phase Phase 1

Staff

70 $10,500

Labor Fee / Staff

70

Labor Hrs. / Staff

Recommendations and Plan Dev. Draft Report Final Report and Presentation

Parking Opers. 35% $150

Vanessa Solesbee

Quinn Pettifer

The Solesbee Group Optional

IPI

$12,000

80

80

$2,625

35

35

Community Marketing Expert Engagement and Comm. Panel 40% 20% N/A $150 $75 Flat Rate Estimated Hours by Task

Casey Jones, CAPP

Firm Standard Parking Plus

Role/Expertise Overall Availability During Term of Contract Billing Rates – Hourly Tasks Description Task A Parking Supply/Demand Study Task B Parking Program Management Review Task C Long-term Parking Strategy Task D Parking Alternatives – Design/ Financial Assessment Tasks A - J Transportation Analysis Tasks A - E Community Education, Outreach and Strategic Communication Plan Development

Project Staff Hours, Labor Costs and Availability Matrix by Task

$199,870

Total

46 20 20

131

120

81

60

80

Avg. Rate $171 Totals 840

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

41

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

OTHER ITEMS Additional Detail (Optional) Kimley-Horn will provide WSU with its proprietary Park+ modeling program. Park+ is being used at numerous universities and municipalities throughout the country, as a means of addressing the need for a comprehensive, dynamic, and iterative transportation and parking demand analysis model for the campus planning area. The following sections provide a brief introduction into the Park+ modeling platform, as well as the direct approach we have developed for the WSU campus.

Introduction to Park+ The Park+ Parking Scenario Planning Model is an ArcGIS integrated module that allows the user to evaluate existing parking, identify new development and parking facilities, multimodal parameters, and parking management scenarios to analyze the total impacts of parking demand for municipal, campus, or development settings. The Park+ Model allows the user to manipulate various inputs, create alternative scenarios, and adjust analysis area’s to create specific and localized evaluation sets to help predict the effects and impacts of land use-parking demand relationships. Scenarios can be evaluated from the aggregate level to the finite level. The goal of the Park+ Model is to provide our clients the tools to better manage and evaluate their parking management decisions, using data that they already maintain. The Park+ Model has been developed in response to many years of parking and supply/demand analysis that we have completed throughout the country. Throughout this time period, we have come to recognize the redundancy inherent in a traditional supply/demand study, with the results of the analysis largely varying on the latest change to master planning efforts or committed developments. It became apparent that supply/demand studies were like selling a new car – the minute a study is completed, it depreciates in value. In an effort to counter this trend, we developed a robust and dynamic parking demand model, largely housed in Microsoft Excel, which allowed the user to maintain an inventory of parking capacity and land use characteristics. The results of the model predicted parking demand, almost always on a zonal basis, and allowed our clients to better understand and maintain control of their parking demand. Over time, the model grew in complexity and user features, ultimately featuring an output feature that allowed the user to link results of the parking demand model from the Excel database to ArcGIS. Unlimited Parking Solutions

Although the tabular parking demand model served as an effective planning tool, we recognized that developing the model in a geospatial environment would significantly enhance its efficiency, making the model dynamic, interactive, and revolutionizing the way the industry calculates parking demand for land uses. And so, Park+ was born. As this tool has been developed, with the help of our friends and colleagues in the parking industry, we have been able to validate that the endeavor to merge parking planning and geospatial analysis truly provides our clients the ability to do so much more than measure parking demand. Unlimited Parking Solutions

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

42

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

Initially, it was intended that Park+ be developed with similar components of a traditional parking supply/demand study, but with greater flexibility and more dynamic in nature. As the model development team worked through its various components, it became apparent that there was an opportunity to incorporate much more and beyond what is currently provided by overall modeling efforts of the parking industry. Therefore, additional tools were developed to include multi-modal components, parking management overlays, special event overlays, public/private parking allocation, pricing components, and sustainability metrics. As each of these components were developed, the Park+ Model evolved further away from supply/ demand analysis and into the realm of scenario planning - asking and answering those tough “What If?” questions that drive parking and transportation management decisions in our client’s communities and campuses. Model components have continued to be refined and expanded as we have responded to the needs of the growing Park+ user group. The Park+ user group includes a mixture of campus and municipal parking and planning officials, all of whom are using the model in various applications throughout their communities. The map below shows the current locations where the model has been implemented. Additionally, the list on the following page provides direct references for Park+ users at academic campuses similar to WSU.

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

43

Comprehensive transportation plan No. 6990-RWSUTP13  |  November 22, 2013

User Name University of Washington

Texas A&M University

Arizona State University

Colorado State University

Primary Contact Josh Kavanagh Director, UW Transportation 206.685.1567 [email protected] Peter Lange Executive Director 979-845-9700 [email protected] Melinda Helton Director, Parking and Transit 480.965.5994 Melinda.Helton@ asu.edu Dave Bradford Director 970-491-7041 David.W.Bradford@ colostate.edu

Park+ User Group Contact NA

Status Model implemented in Fall 2012; in between Park+ user’s as staff turnover has dictated

Gabriel Mendez 480.965.4311 Arnold.Mendez@ asu.edu

Model implemented in Winter 2013; primary user who assists with some beta testing efforts for ongoing Park+ developments Model implemented in Summer 2013; ASU staff is working to migrate main campus Park+ model to downtown campus

Doug Mayhew Associate Director 970-491-1514 Doug.Mayhew@ colostate.edu

Model implemented in October 2012; KHA and user about to evaluate the development of a new on campus stadium with Park+

Eric Irwin GIS Specialist 979.862.3333 [email protected]

Prepared for Washington State University  |  Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

44

WSU C21417 EXHIBIT C