[PDF]DEBIT REFORM - Rackcdn.com21353cb4da875d727a1d-ccea4d4b51151ba804c4b0295d8d06a4.r8.cf1.rackcdn.com...
0 downloads
197 Views
59KB Size
DEBIT REFORM: REMINDERS OF THE FACTS Debit reform increases competition: • • • • • •
• •
Prior to debit reform, the card networks fixed all of the fees that issuers charge merchants without any limitation on that price-‐fixing. This price-‐fixing by Visa and MasterCard resulted in highly inefficient and unreasonable fees as networks raised prices in an effort to win bank business. Debit reform limits that price-‐fixing to a reasonable level for the largest of the large banks – those with more than $10 billion in assets. Debit reform does not limit pricing for any bank that wants to set its own swipe fees rather than follow the Visa/MC fixed rates. Debit reform thereby created incentives for banks to set their own fees and compete. Before reform, Visa and MC blocked competition in the largest banks by paying them to sign exclusivity deals where they would be the only networks enabled on any debit cards issued by the banks. J.P. Morgan analysts estimated that Visa and MasterCard had exclusive deals with 40 to 50% of the entire debit card market, and 79% of Visa’s volume from just it’s top 10 issuers was part of an exclusive arrangement. The result: The once robust domestic debit market shrunk from over 150 debit networks to 20 between the 1970’s and 2000’s despite more competitive pricing and lower fraud rates. Reform ended these market-‐killing exclusivity practices so customers of network services could have a competitive choice.
Free checking is up, not down, since debit reform: • • •
The American Bankers Association surveys checking account practices every year. In 2010, when debit reform passed, the ABA reported that 53 percent of consumers had free checking. Last year, the ABA reported that 61 percent of consumers had free checking.
Consumers win with debit reform: • •
•
Economic analysis of debit reform savings in the United States found $5.7 billion in consumer savings supporting 37,000 jobs in the first year of debit reform alone. Moody’s released a report in 2012 bolstering those findings and saying: o “As merchant acquirers pass on debit fee savings to retailers, we believe retailers will use them to help shield customers from the impact of these other rising costs.” o “While on the surface it would be easy to presume that retailers would benefit from a reduced debit interchange fee, we do not expect retailers to see a material improvement in their earnings due to the Durbin Amendment.” USA Today and the American Banker had stories supporting those findings in 2012.
•
And, in January, USA Today (“2016 Gas Prices: Summer Uptick Won’t Last,” USA Today, Jan. 6, 2016) reported on the expected fourth consecutive year of lower gasoline prices in the United States. Banks never mention that when pretending merchants don’t compete on price.
Small banks helped, not hurt, by debit reform: • • • • •
The Philadelphia Federal Reserve released a study at the end of February on the impact of debit reform on small financial institutions. Debit reform exempts 98.6 percent of all financial institutions and only applies its fee provisions to those with more than $10 billion in assets. The Philadelphia Fed study found that after reform, “the volume of transactions conducted with cards issued by exempt banks grew faster than it did for large banks.” Jeremy Foster of BancVue said debit reform “represents an opportunity for credit unions to further differentiate themselves from the megabanks.” The Credit Union Times has reported that debit reform created “a powerful way for credit unions to accumulate market share” and “what some say is a huge opportunity for credit unions.”