Northstar Asset Management


Northstar Asset Management - Rackcdn.com67ee902be0ea8dff5241-922850c24b606feb96d7725a9b9d138f.r95.cf2.rackcdn.com/R...

10 downloads 207 Views 2MB Size

March 2017

Northstar Asset Management Investment forum

Northstar Asset Management – Key differentiators Northstar focuses on two activities: Independent research → Generating returns Quantifying bet sizes

→ Managing risk

We understand the importance of managing risk and have solved the mystery of integrating fundamental research into a quantitative portfolio construction framework

SLIDE 2

Independent research → Generating returns Local Equity Attribution (vs Jalsh Index) 2016 Total Local Equity STANDARD BANK GROUP LIMITED RAUBEX GROUP BIDVEST GROUP LIMITED SASOL LIMITED DATATEC LIMITED A E C I LIMITED GROUP FIVE LIMITED NETCARE LIMITED COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE RICHMONT SA METROFILE HOLDINGS LIMITED NEDBANK GROUP LIMITED FIRSTRAND LIMITED BARCLAYS AFRICA GROUP LIMITED GRINDROD LIMITED NASPERS LIMITED MR PRICE GROUP LIMITED SUPER GROUP LIMITED BID CORPORATION LIMITED ASPEN PHARMACARE HLDS LIMITED ASTRAL FOODS LIMITED ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV SA/N REINET INVESTMENTS SCA BRAIT S.A. REMGRO LIMITED BRIMSTONE INVESTMENT CORP LTD N WOOLWORTHS HOLDINGS LIMITED INVESTEC PLC SUN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO PLC OLD MUTUAL PLC

-100

SLIDE 3

Global Attribution (vs MSCI World in ZAR) 2016 Total Global Equity UNION PACIFIC CORP BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY B MICROSOFT CORP CISCO SYSTEMS

SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP-ADR ING GROUP CVA

66.7% hit rate

62.5% hit rate

SAP AG SPONSORED ADR FLOWSERVE CORP CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL MARKEL CORP JD.COM INC-ADR APPLE INC. ISHARES CORE EURO STOXX 50 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO ROCHE HOLDINGS LTD-SPONS ADR

GILEAD SCIENCES INC

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Quantifying bet sizes → Managing risk Limiting downside relative to the All Share Index

Enhancing upside relative to the All Share Index

Attribution per company - 2016

0,0%

3,0%

2,5%

-0,5%

2,0%

Attribution

-1,0%

Attribution

Attribution per company - 2016

Northstar: -4.1% All Share Index: -7.1%

-1,5%

Northstar: 8.6% All Share Index: 8.0%

1,5%

1,0% -2,0%

0,5%

-2,5%

0,0% 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Lowest 10 negative attributors Northstar local companies All Share Index companies

SLIDE 4

10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Top 20 positive attributors Northstar local companies All Share Index companies

Relationship between fund size and investment performance in SA Fund return vs. maximum drawdown vs. fund size (at start of period) Jan 2007 to Jan 2017 20% 18% 16%

• No significant relationship between fund size and returns • No significant relationship between fund size and drawdown • Funds with lower drawdowns have tended to deliver better overall returns

Fund return

14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% -60%

SLIDE 5

-50%

-40% -30% Fund maximum drawdown

-20%

-10%

SA large cap industrials have outperformed over the last 10 years Price returns 450 400 We would argue that dual listings and rand weakness have played into the hands of large cap industrial stocks

350

Indexed to 100

300 250 200

150 100 50 0 Dec 06

Dec 07

Dec 08

Dec 09 INDI25

SLIDE 6

Dec 10 Top40

Dec 11 Mid Cap

Dec 12 Small Cap

Dec 13

Dec 14

Dec 15

Dec 16

Large cap industrials enjoy high liquidity Return vs. Daily Value Traded (10 years to Feb 2017) 40% CLS MRP

30% AVI SPP REM

Return (%)

20%

APN

SHP

WHL

BVT

10%

TFG

SNH TBS

TRU MTN

NTC

0%

PIK

NPN

SA Industrial 25 Index average traded value & return , 378 , 18,1%

CFR

IPL

-10% • •

-20%

Large cap liquid industrial shares have been the area of outperformance Large managers have been invested in these counters through skill and necessity and have consequently been rewarded

-30% -40%

-

200

400

600

800

1 000

1 200

1 400

1 600

Daily value traded (R'm) SA stocks (Large, Mid & Small Cap) SLIDE 7

INDI25 Index stocks

Average

1 800

2 000

2 200

In SA most stocks have under-performed the large cap industrials over the last decade Relative price returns – Top 40, Mid & Small cap stocks vs. Large cap industrials 1,4 • •

1,2

The Top 40, Mid & Small cap indices have underperformed the Large cap industrial index over the last decade … however that trend has reversed over the last year This reversal complicates the investment landscape for large managers

1

0,8

0,6

0,4 Dec 2006

Dec 2007

Dec 2008

Dec 2009

Dec 2010

Top40 vs. INDI25 SLIDE 8

Dec 2011 Mid Cap vs. INDI25

Dec 2012

Dec 2013

Small Cap vs. INDI25

Dec 2014

Dec 2015

Dec 2016

Small caps outperform large caps 600 • •

500

Globally small companies outperform large companies Assuming the same occurs in South Africa, a natural advantage exists for smaller specialist managers vs. very large managers

400

300

200

100

0 Dec 98

Dec 00

Dec 02

Dec 04

Dec 06

MSCI World Small Cap TR SLIDE 9

Dec 08

Dec 10

MSCI World Large Cap TR

Dec 12

Dec 14

Dec 16

Much easier for small managers to reposition Days to trade out of Top10 holdings (5% of daily trade) 300 265

Small managers can reposition much quicker than large managers

250

205

Days

200 149

150 118 104

97

100 69

67

66

50 21 2

6

SOL NPN

SBK BGA

3

8

2

2

BTI OML

OML BTI

REI SOL

2

2

10

7

INP INP

SAP SAP

0 NPN SNH

Top 10 holdings R40bn fund

SLIDE 10

R1.2bn fund

REM AGL

NED BIL

Alpha creator - ING Group o ING has gone through significant restructuring initiatives over the past 5 years becoming today a robust and simplified banking group o Management has several levers to drive performance over the next 3 years. The group has guided for improvements in NIM, better efficiencies from the implementation of a “direct bank” strategy and cost cutting initiatives and loan expansion from significant cross selling opportunities in Benelux o ING’s capital position is sound and the group has resumed paying dividend in Dec 2014 after having suspended distributions in 2009 o Valuation is compelling

Capital Position

Banking Channels - Europe (% of interactions)

20%

100%

18%

80%

16%

14,8%

14,4%

14%

12,3%

12% 9,3%

10% 8%

13,5% 13,1%

14,5% 60%

11,7% 40%

10,2%

20%

7,6%

6%

0% FY 2006

FY 2008

FY 2010

FY 2012

FY 2014

2005

Tier I Capital

Branch

Management ✓ SLIDE 11

2010

Industry

Mobile

ATM

Competitive Advantage

Valuation





2015F Digital

Other

Alpha detractor – Sun International o Management has cornered the business by adding excessive debt

R 200

1400

R 180

1200

R 160 1000

R 140

R 120

800

R 100 600

R 80 R 60

400

R 40 200

R 20 R0 1999

0 2001

2003

2005

2007

Sun International share price SLIDE 12

2009

2011

Net Debt To Shareholders Equity

2013

2015

Questions

“Long term exposure to quality assets where value exceeds price”

The information contained in this presentation is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular person. The information herein does not constitute or form part of any offer to issue or sell, or any solicitation of any offer to subscribe for or purchase any specific product and is not to be construed as advice or guidance in any form whatsoever. We do not claim to act in any way as an advisor and you should not act upon this information without appropriate professional advice. Northstar Asset Management (Pty) Ltd is an authorised financial services provider.

SLIDE 13

Sentio is a Latin word meaning “To hold a view or a strong opinion” 15

• Founded 2007 - We have a solid 10 year track record, tested through GFC in 2008, we can compete with the best • Affiliate of RMI Group – best of both worlds. Ownership: 82% management/ staff; 18% RMI; staff ownership means “skin in the game” • AuM – cR14bn; 97% of AuM in long-only, the balance in HF. Approx. R1.5bn in unit trusts; continued strong inflows

• We have a world class process that integrates deep stock analysis with robust risk management • Globally competitive - significant local and global market experience integrated into the process • 10 years of successful investment in the best Systems and people – World class systems and fast growing team; developing talent • Outsourced non-core activities: Independent Administration (Maitland) & Compliance (ICS) • Retail Offering: Sanlam Select Optimised Equity, Sanlam Select Absolute, Sentio SCI HIKMA Shari’ah Equity, Sentio SCI HIKMA Balanced

As a client you get institutional robustness, agility of boutique manager, best of breed process

16

Humility + discipline = outperformance Our core competency is in VALUING ASSETS and PRICING RISK - Deep INTEGRATION of Stock Picking and Risk Management We are STYLE AGNOSTIC investors - We invest in Value, Growth, Quality and Risk assets as long as they are cheap We believe in running a DISCIPLINED PROCESS to achieve consistent Alpha over time - Our CULTURE is difficult to replicate – our process, people, systems and methodologies are unique Our focus is on the QUALITY OF RISK we take to ensure returns are sustainable and repeatable over time - Because all returns are not born equal!

17

’ Boutique managers must use size to their advantage! Globally, smaller managers outperform larger managers over time… Even though locally the average boutique manager has not outperformed the average large manager, there has been large variability in boutique performance – don’t focus on the average… Thus, there are clear opportunities within Boutiques to positively differentiate yourself versus larger managers. The biggest advantage is the smaller size of boutiques versus large managers. This makes boutiques more nimble and flexible in order to express views relative to the peer group. Like diversification, smaller size is like a “Free Lunch”, which can allow sustainable outperformance. However, you have to use it properly and effectively Good boutiques can use their size to generate sustainable risk-adjusted outperformance of their larger counterparts. FOCUS ON MANAGERS THAT USE SIZE TO THEIR ADVANTAGE

18

Active Management Value Add

Function Of

Return (Alpha)

Risk (Tracking Error)

• Active Management Value Add • Should be: Risk adjusted performance…which is • Information Ratio (Alpha / Tracking Error)

• Alpha – Excess performance above benchmark • Tracking Error – Risk manager takes relative to benchmark.

19

Manager Skill Active Management Value Add

Constraints

Portfolio Construction Efficiency

Function Of Transfer Coefficient

• Manager Skill – Ability to pick stocks. Disciplined Investment Philosophy and process

• Constraints – How much active skill is WASTED OR DILUTED? Size of manager – LARGER managers at a distinct DISADVANTAGE. Long only constraint, Mandate constraints, Structure of market, etc. • Portfolio Construction Efficiency – Breadth of portfolio and Risk Management.

20

• Fund Size plays a significant role in reducing active skill transfer into active portfolios. • Large funds can squander over 50% of manager skill!

21

Differentiated source of Alpha

• Sentio takes meaningful positions in Mid-cap/Small Caps which we confident will be the large caps of the future. • 40% OF ALPHA CAME FROM SMALL AND MID CAPS, which will be difficult to replicate for large managers.

22

1. Take meaningful positions in smaller companies that can become the large caps of the future – MAJOR DRIVER OF ALPHA 2. Adjust the portfolio more quickly to take account of major macro shifts – MARKETS ARE DYNAMIC, INVESTORS SHOULD BE TOO 3. Speed of execution for high conviction investment ideas – we can action a risk or opportunity and execute much faster than a large manager

4. Consistency of idea generation and tighter culture of investing – higher conviction of ideas is possible

23

24

This document is confidential, contents are the property of Sentio Capital •The information does not constitute an offer, solicitation or recommendation for the purchase or sale of any investment, investment vehicles, securities or other financial instruments nor does the information constitute advice or an expression of our view as to whether a particular security or financial instrument is appropriate for you and meets your financial objectives. All information in this document are the property of Sentio Capital Management (Pty) Ltd (“Sentio Capital”) and receipt of it does not transfer ownership to anyone. All information is intended for the use of the recipient and no distribution is permitted.

CONTACTS: Traugott von Czettritz u. N (TC) +27 11 880 6080 [email protected]

Lee Privat de Garilhe +27 11 880 1994 [email protected]

Sentio Capital Management Pty (Ltd) Ltd is an Authorised Financial Service Provider. For more details on out Conflicts of Interests Policy and our Compliance Officer please visit our website: www.sentio-capital.com

25

Perpetua Investment Managers 2017 Investment Forum Delphine Govender Chief Investment Officer

Perpetua is an authentic boutique investment firm Defining boutique characteristic

Perpetua

Owner-managed



Specialised, differentiated and focused



Key investment professionals have strong pedigree



Passionate about investing and continuous refinement



Defining and defined investment approach



Genuinely active: benchmark agnostic and nimble



Key points about the firm Location

Based in Cape Town, satellite office in Johannesburg

Ownership

100% owner-managed*; independently operated

Inception date

1 October 2012 commenced managing assets

AUM

AUM R7,4bn at 1 February 2017

Transformation Status

BEE Level 1 Contributor; currently 100% black owned and managed

Team size

21 employees; 10 in investment team (+95 years experience)

Administration

Outsource agreement with Maitland Fund Services

Compliance

Outsource agreement with Compli-serve

Unit Trust Distribution

Co-branded agreement with MET Collective Investments

Mandates

SA Domestic equity ; SA Domestic balanced; Global balanced

*In September 2015, Perpetua Investment Managers (PIM) concluded an agreement granting an option to Rand Merchant Insurance Investment Managers Group (RMI IMG) to purchase up to 25% of the equity in PIM.

Perpetua’s performance formula 1.

Fundamentally undervalued assets

2.

Multiple value-oriented investment theses applied

3.

Long- term investment horizon

4.

Rigorous, fundamental and proprietary bottom-up research

5.

Experienced, skilled and generalist investment team

6.

Explicit pre and post investment risk assessment at share level

7.

Minimise permanent risk of loss and understand importance of position sizes

+

+

+ +

+

+

= PREDICTABLE INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE

Perpetua’s TRUE VALUE continuum is unique Earnings Visibility

Higher

Momentum Market direction matters most

Growth Visible earnings growth key driver of price

• Exploit multiple value-based theses

Relative Value

Recognised growth and Quality stocks reasonably priced Higher

Company inexpensive vs. own history and/or market

Lower

Value

Valuation

Valuation

GARP/QARP

• Do not restrict universe based only on attributes

Assets undervalued in the “whole”

Unrecognised Growth Likely growth not being priced in

Deep Value Mean-reversion on earnings Earnings Visibility

Lower

Perpetua invests only along the TRUE VALUE continuum: we stop short of paying for future optionality discounted into the price.

• Not contrarian in the extreme

Differentiation potential of a smaller manager 180

Number of shares a manager can own to 3% based on AUM level 166

165

163

160

147

Number of shares

140

112

120

97

100

80

80

71 60

60

51

42

40

33

20 0 3

5

10

20

50

70

100

150

200

250

SA Equities under management R'bn

Note: Restricted fund ownership in a company’s issued shared at 20%, whilst still maintaining that stock position at 3% of fund.

300

400

Value Alpha Non-Value Alpha CSV

Oct-16

Jul-16

Apr-16

Jan-16

Oct-15

Jul-15

Apr-15

Jan-15

Oct-14

Jul-14

Apr-14

Jan-14

Oct-13

Jul-13

Apr-13

Jan-13

Oct-12

Jul-12

Apr-12

Jan-12

Oct-11

Jul-11

Apr-11

Jan-11

Oct-10

Jul-10

Apr-10

Jan-10

Oct-09

Jul-09

Apr-09

Jan-09

Oct-08

Jul-08

Apr-08

Jan-08

Oct-07

Jul-07

Apr-07

Jan-07

Oct-06

Jul-06

Apr-06

Jan-06

Oct-05

Jul-05

Apr-05

Jan-05

Oct-04

Jul-04

Apr-04

Jan-04

Oct-03

Jul-03

Apr-03

Jan-03

Differentiation potential of a specialised manager Mid Cap Value Funds & Large Cap Non-Value Funds Rolling 12 Month Outperformance vs. Cross-Sectional Volatility (CSV)

40,00% 15,00%

30,00% 14,00%

20,00% 13,00%

10,00% 12,00%

0,00% 11,00%

-10,00% 10,00%

-20,00% 9,00%

-30,00% 8,00%

-40,00% 7,00%

Thank you [email protected]