Policy Analysis: Valuation of Ecosystem Services in the Southern


Policy Analysis: Valuation of Ecosystem Services in the Southern...

2 downloads 80 Views 802KB Size

Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN LIBRARY

Policy Analysis

Policy Analysis: Valuation of Ecosystem Services in the Southern Appalachian Mountains H. Spencer Banzhaf, Dallas Burtraw, Susie Chung Criscimagna, Bernard Jackson Cosby, David A. Evans, Alan Krupnick, and Juha Siikamaki Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03829 • Publication Date (Web): 12 Feb 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 24, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Policy Analysis: Valuation of Ecosystem Services in the Southern

2

Appalachian Mountains

3

H. Spencer Banzhaf,† Dallas Burtraw,*‡ Susie Chung Criscimagna,Ψ Bernard J. Cosby,ɸ David

4

A. Evans,§ Alan J. Krupnick,‡ and Juha V. Siikamäki‡

5



6

Hayward CA (formerly Resources for the Future), ɸDepartment of Environmental Sciences,

7

University of Virginia, §U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

8

Abstract

9

This study estimates the economic value of an increase in ecosystem services attributable to the

10

reduced acidification expected from more stringent air pollution policy. By integrating a detailed

11

biogeochemical model that projects future ecological recovery with economic methods that

12

measure preferences for specific ecological improvements, we estimate the economic value of

13

ecological benefits from new air pollution policies in the Southern Appalachian ecosystem. Our

14

results indicate that these policies generate aggregate benefits of about $3.7 billion, or about $16

15

per year per household in the region. The study provides currently missing information about the

16

ecological benefits from air pollution policies that is needed to evaluate such policies

17

comprehensively. More broadly, the study also illustrates how integrated biogeochemical and

18

economic assessments of multidimensional ecosystems can evaluate the relative benefits of

19

different policy options that vary by scale and across ecosystem attributes.

Economics Department, Georgia State University, ‡Resources for the Future, ΨEden Housing,

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

20

TOC/Abstract Art Southern Appalachian region high-elevation areas especially affected by acidification

21 22

Introduction

23

Ecosystem services in the Southern Appalachian Mountain (SAM) region have been

24

compromised by years of acid precipitation. We estimate the monetary value of restoring

25

ecosystem services in this region by wedding a biogeochemical model to an economic model.

26

The biogeochemical model, together with information drawn from the literature, is used to

27

identify the likely effects of acidification on ecosystems. The economic model uses a stated

28

preference (SP) survey1,2 to elicit individuals' willingness to pay (WTP) for these services.3,4,5,6

29

Our approach makes three specific contributions. First, it facilitates the measurement of

30

overall benefits of ecosystem improvements expected from new air pollution policies by closely

31

tying effects of acidification identified by the natural sciences to attributes of the ecosystem

32

valued by the general public.

33

Second, we use choice experiment techniques that permit the valuation of the different

34

ecological dimensions of the environmental improvements, which allows one to identify the

35

benefits associated with each constituent ecosystem service. In this study, those services include

36

the health of streams, forests, and bird populations. Some SP studies estimate values for

37

individual animal species,7,8 others take a holistic approach and examine values for the totality of

38

the ecosystem.9,10,11 Our approach bridges these two poles by valuing wholesale changes to the

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 28

Page 3 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

39

entire ecosystem and decomposing values for the different ecological attributes. This evaluation

40

of the dimensions of an ecosystem separately provides information that can be used to evaluate

41

tradeoffs among ecosystem services when designing conservation plans12,13,14 as well as to

42

identify those services most likely to yield higher entry fees or other payments for ecosystem

43

services.15

44

Third, our approach could inform analyses of policy proposals for other natural areas.

45

Because of their high costs, economic studies that assess the value of ecosystem services cannot

46

be performed for each potential policy proposal and each target area. Hence, the ability to

47

transfer benefits from a study of one policy context or area to another context or area, termed

48

benefits transfer,16,17,18 is highly desirable. Such transfers are most reliable when they adjust for

49

differences in ecosystem services provided across the two contexts or areas. Our approach allows

50

for such adjustments.

51

We apply the modeling framework to the SAM region, which encompasses parts of

52

Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee, North Carolina, and Georgia, comprising 37 million acres

53

(Fig. 1). The majority of the region is unaffected by acid precipitation, but high-elevation areas

54

are vulnerable for two reasons.19 First, these areas receive the greatest loadings of sulfate and

55

nitrates, partly because of their proximity to emitting sources and partly from their immersion in

56

acidic clouds. Second, their soils are thinner and have insufficient base cations to neutralize the

57

acid. These high-elevation areas are marked in Fig. 1.

58

We demonstrate how information from the biogeochemical model and the WTP estimates

59

generated from our SP survey can be used to estimate the economic benefits from implementing

60

a set of related recent U.S. regulations: the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, the Mercury and Air

61

Toxics Standard, the Industrial Boiler rule, and the greenhouse gas regulations for electricity

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

62

generators. Our study also is related to previous studies of ecosystem services in the southern

63

Appalachians, including Ahn et al.,20 Kramer et al.,10 and Zinkhan et al,14 as well as to studies of

64

acid pollution in streams.21 However, none of those studies link values to a biogeochemical

65

model, nor do they permit consideration of the tradeoffs between ecosystem services.

66

Methods

67

Biochemical modeling

68

Current and past acid deposition has harmed both aquatic and terrestrial environments,

69

though aquatic damages are better documented.22 As such, we use a biogeochemical model of the

70

effect of acid deposition on aquatic chemistry to inform the construction of the survey

71

instrument, and supplement it with information on possible terrestrial effects as described below.

72

Specifically, we use the Model for Acidification of Groundwater In Catchments (MAGIC) to

73

forecast the acidity of streams under different deposition scenarios. We use MAGIC because it

74

has been used in numerous peer-reviewed studies, including some in our study area, and in

75

evaluations of environmental regulations. MAGIC has been used to reconstruct the history of

76

acidification, to examine current patterns of recovery, and to simulate future trends in stream

77

water acidity and concentrations of ions in numerous sites around the world.Error! Bookmark not

78

defined.23

79

Specifically, we use MAGIC to forecast acid-neutralizing capacity (ANC) of streams in

80

the region under the various scenarios. ANC is a commonly used chemical indicator of the

81

ecological effect of acidification on aquatic systems, measuring the concentration of base cations

82

in surface water.24,25 Low ANC levels are associated with higher aluminum concentrations and

83

reduced fish communities and fish species diversity.26,27

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 28

Page 5 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

84

MAGIC assumes that concentrations of major ions are governed by simultaneous

85

reactions involving SO42- adsorption, cation exchange, dissolution-precipitation-speciation of Al,

86

and dissolution-speciation of inorganic C. The model includes mass balance equations in which

87

the flux of major ions to and from the soil is assumed to be controlled by atmospheric inputs,

88

chemical weathering, net uptake and loss in biomass, and loss to runoff. At the heart of MAGIC

89

is the size of the pool of exchangeable base cations in the soil. As the fluxes to and from this

90

pool change over time because of changes in atmospheric deposition, the chemical equilibria

91

between soil and soil solution shift, changing surface water chemistry. The model is calibrated to

92

observed data from a water quality system to replicate observed atmospheric and hydrologic

93

inputs, and then run using assumed atmospheric and hydrologic inputs to forecast trends.

94

Additional information on the MAGIC model can be found in the Supporting Information

95

(Appendix S1).

96

For this study, MAGIC was applied to a sample of 169 representative sites across seven

97

states, including high-elevation wild trout streams in our SAM study region. Such streams

98

account for about 40% of the total stream length in the region.Error! Bookmark not defined. We use the

99

threshold of an ANC value below 50µeq/L to describe a stream as being affected by

100

acidification, as these streams have a marked decline in the abundance of fish species, including

101

trout.28

102

Using MAGIC, we forecast future conditions under 32 hypothetical future deposition

103

scenarios. Specifically, we analyze eight scenarios of future SO4 deposition resulting from

104

potential changes in anthropogenic emissions combined with four scenarios of future nitrogen

105

deposition. The eight SO4 scenarios range from, at one extreme, a scenario based on deposition

106

remaining at 1980 levels to, at another extreme, essentially the elimination of all future

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

107

anthropogenic sulfur (SO42-) deposition, with six deposition scenarios between. Two scenarios

108

hold SO42- deposition at either 1990 or 2000 levels constant over the forecast horizon, while the

109

four others assume deposition reductions by 20% increments from 2000 levels by 2020. The

110

deposition levels were modeled out to 2100. Of the four scenarios for nitrogen deposition, one

111

assumes NO3 deposition remaining at 2000 levels, another assumes a 25% reduction in these

112

levels by 2020, and a third assumes a 50% reduction. All three assume NH4 deposition is at

113

110% of 2000 levels. The fourth scenario assumes that both NO3 and NH4 deposition decline by

114

50% from 2000 levels by 2020. One of the 32 scenarios approximates levels already achieved by

115

Title IV Acid Rain Program while another approximates the more stringent Clean Air Interstate

116

Rule (CAIR) (which is similar to its replacement, the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule). We find

117

stream quality to be sensitive to the SO4 deposition levels but relatively insensitive to these

118

nitrogen deposition levels.

119

From these 32 sulfur and nitrogen deposition scenarios, we estimate a response function

120

of aquatic ecosystem impacts, which was incorporated into the design of our survey and into the

121

changes in ecosystem services that we evaluate. For example, MAGIC predicts that, under

122

CAIR, 21.3% of streams in the region are acidic (