Section 2 - Forming


[PDF]Section 2 - Forming - Rackcdn.com309fbf2c62e8221fbaf0-b80c17cbaf20104b072d586b316c6210.r88.cf1.rackcdn.com...

3 downloads 123 Views 18MB Size

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL (AHSS) APPLICATION GUIDELINES Version 4.1

June 2009

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Contents Preface ....................................................................................................................................................... v Section 1 General Description of AHSS .................................................................................................. 1-1 1.A. Definitions .................................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.B. Metallurgy of AHSS ................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.B.1. Dual Phase (DP) Steel ..................................................................................................... 1-5 1.B.2. Transformation-Induced Plasticity (TRIP) Steel ................................................................ 1-7 1.B.3. Complex Phase (CP) Steel .............................................................................................. 1-8 1.B.4. Martensitic (MS) Steel ...................................................................................................... 1-9 1.B.5. Ferritic-Bainitic (FB) Steel ................................................................................................ 1-9 1.B.6. Twinning-Induced Plasticity (TWIP) Steel ....................................................................... 1-10 1.B.7. Hot-Formed (HF) Steel ................................................................................................... 1-10 1.B.8. Post-Forming Heat-Treatable (PFHT) Steel ................................................................... 1-12 1.B.9. Evolving AHSS Types .................................................................................................... 1-13 1.C. Conventional Low- and High-Strength Automotive Sheet Steels ............................................. 1-14 1.C.1. Mild steels ...................................................................................................................... 1-14 1.C.2. Interstitial-free (IF) steels (Low strength and high strength) ........................................... 1-14 1.C.3. Bake hardenable (BH) steels ......................................................................................... 1-14 1.C.4. Isotropic (IS) steels ........................................................................................................ 1-14 1.C.5. Carbon-manganese (CM) steels .................................................................................... 1-14 1.C.6. High-strength low-alloy (HSLA) steels ........................................................................... 1-14 Section 2 Forming ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.A. General Comments ................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.B. Computerized Forming-Process Development .......................................................................... 2-2 2.C. Sheet Forming ........................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.C.1. Mechanical Properties ..................................................................................................... 2-3 2.C.1.a. Yield Strength - Total Elongation Relationships ...................................................... 2-4 2.C.1.b. Tensile Strength - Total Elongation Relationships ................................................... 2-4 2.C.1.c. Work Hardening Exponent (n-value) ...................................................................... 2-5 2.C.1.d. Stress-Strain Curves ............................................................................................... 2-8 2.C.1.e. Normal Anisotropy Ratio ( or rm) ....................................................................... 2-15 2.C.1.f. Strain Rate Effects ................................................................................................. 2-15 2.C.1.g. Bake Hardening and Aging ................................................................................... 2-17 2.C.1.h. Key Points ............................................................................................................ 2-18 2.C.2. Forming Limits ............................................................................................................... 2-19 2.C.2.a. Forming Limit Curves (FLC) ................................................................................. 2-19 2.C.2.b. Sheared Edge Stretching Limits ........................................................................... 2-22 2.C.2.c. Shear Fracture ...................................................................................................... 2-27 2.C.2.d. Key Points ............................................................................................................ 2-27 2.C.3. Forming Modes .............................................................................................................. 2-28 2.C.3.a. Stretching ............................................................................................................. 2-28 2.C.3.b. Deep Drawing (Cup Drawing) ............................................................................... 2-31 2.C.3.c. Bending ................................................................................................................ 2-33 2.C.3.d. Roll Forming ......................................................................................................... 2-35 2.C.3.e. Hot-Forming ......................................................................................................... 2-37 2.C.3.f. Key Points ........................................................................................................... 2-39 2.C.4. Tool Design .................................................................................................................... 2-39 2.C.4.a. Tool Materials ....................................................................................................... 2-40 2.C.4.b. Tool Design Issues ............................................................................................... 2-42 2.C.4.c. Prototype Tools ..................................................................................................... 2-43 2.C.4.d. Key Points ............................................................................................................ 2-43

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page ii

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.5. Springback ..................................................................................................................... 2-44 2.C.5.a. Origins of Springback ........................................................................................... 2-45 2.C.5.b. Types of Springback ............................................................................................. 2-46 2.C.5.c. Springback Correction .......................................................................................... 2-51 2.C.5.d. Key Points ........................................................................................................... 2-61 2.C.6. Blanking, Shearing, and Trim Operations ...................................................................... 2-62 2.C.6.a. General Comments .............................................................................................. 2-62 2.C.6.b. Tool Wear, Clearances, and Burr Height .............................................................. 2-62 2.C.6.c. Key Points ............................................................................................................ 2-64 2.C.7. Press Requirements ...................................................................................................... 2-64 2.C.7.a. Force versus Energy ............................................................................................ 2-64 2.C.7.b. Prediction of Press Forces Using Simulative Tests .............................................. 2-68 2.C.7.c. Extrapolation From Existing Production Data ....................................................... 2-69 2.C.7.d. Computerized Forming-Process Development ..................................................... 2-70 2.C.7.e. Case Study for Press Energy ............................................................................... 2-70 2.C.7.f. Setting Draw Beads .............................................................................................. 2-72 2.C.7.g. Key Points ............................................................................................................ 2-72 2.C.8. Lubrication ..................................................................................................................... 2-72 2.C.9. Multiple Stage Forming .................................................................................................. 2-74 2.C.9.a. General Recommendations .................................................................................. 2-74 2.C.9.b. Key Points ........................................................................................................... 2-75 2.C.10. In-service Requirements .............................................................................................. 2-75 2.C.10.a. Crash Management ............................................................................................ 2-75 2.C.10.b. Fatigue ............................................................................................................... 2-77 2.C.10.c. Key Points .......................................................................................................... 2-78 2.D. Tube Forming .......................................................................................................................... 2-78 2.D.1. High Frequency Welded Tubes ...................................................................................... 2-78 2.D.2. Laser Welded Tailored Tubes ........................................................................................ 2-82 2.D.3. Key Points ...................................................................................................................... 2-84 2.E. Hydroforming (Tubes) .............................................................................................................. 2-84 2.E.1. Pre-Form Bending .......................................................................................................... 2-84 2.E.2. Forming .......................................................................................................................... 2-85 2.E.3. Post Forming Trimming .................................................................................................. 2-86 2.E.4. Design Considerations ................................................................................................... 2-86 2.E.5. Key Points ..................................................................................................................... 2-86 Section 3 Joining ..................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.A. General Comments ................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.B. Welding Procedures .................................................................................................................. 3-2 3.B.1. Resistance Welding ......................................................................................................... 3-2 3.B.1.a. Weld Schedule ........................................................................................................ 3-2 3.B.1.b. Coating Effects ....................................................................................................... 3-6 3.B.1.c. Heat Balance - Material Balance - Thickness Balance ........................................... 3-7 3.B.1.d. Welding Current Mode ............................................................................................ 3-8 3.B.1.e. Electrode Geometry ................................................................................................ 3-9 3.B.1.f. Part Fit-up ............................................................................................................... 3-9 3.B.1.g. Factory Equipment Template .................................................................................. 3-9 3.B.1.h. Judging Weldability Using Carbon Equivalence ..................................................... 3-9 3.B.1.i. Zinc Penetration/Contamination ............................................................................ 3-10 3.B.1.j. Weld Integrity: Test Method and Joint Performance .............................................. 3-10 3.B.2. High Frequency Induction Welding ................................................................................ 3-16 3.B.3. Laser Welding - Fusion .................................................................................................. 3-18 3.B.3.a. Butt Welds and Tailor Welded Products ................................................................ 3-18 3.B.3.b. Assembly Laser Welding ...................................................................................... 3-20 3.B.4. Arc Welding Uncoated Steels – Fusion .......................................................................... 3-21

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page iii

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Table of Contents

Version

4.1

3.C. Brazing .................................................................................................................................... 3-24 3.D. Adhesive Bonding ................................................................................................................... 3-25 3.E. Mechanical Joining .................................................................................................................. 3-26 3.F. Hybrid Joining .......................................................................................................................... 3-29 3.G. Material Issues For Field Weld Repair and Replacement ....................................................... 3-30 Section 4 Glossary .................................................................................................................................. 4-1 Section 5 References .............................................................................................................................. 5-1 Section 6 Appendix ................................................................................................................................. 6-1 Auto/Steel Partnership AHSS Case Study Summaries # 1 Reinforcement Center Pillar Outer..............................................................................................6-2 # 2 Reinforcement Center Body Pillar.............................................................................................6-18 # 3 Panel Rear Rail..........................................................................................................................6-34 # 4 Plate-Underbody Side Rail........................................................................................................6-54 # 5 A-Pillar Front Upper...................................................................................................................6-78 # 6 Reinforcement A-Pillar Rear Upper.........................................................................................6-102 # 7 Reinforcement Center Pillar Outer Upper................................................................................6-124 # 8 Reinforcement Mid-Rail Upper (Right/Left)..............................................................................6-136 # 9 Reinforcement A-Pillar Upper (Right/Left)...............................................................................6-148 #10 Member Floor Side Inner.........................................................................................................6-166

The information contained in this document is intended for the general information of the reader, and any use of such information in connection with specific applications should be undertaken only with expert professional assistance. The World Steel Association and its WorldAutoSteel program has exercised reasonable diligence in preparing this document but is not responsible for any errors or omissions therein and accepts no responsibility to update the information.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page iv

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Version

4.1

Preface The arrival of the new millennium found automakers accelerating programs to reduce vehicle mass for better environmental performance while improving crash management and other safety features. Program goals required new steels with improved formability and major increases in strength. The global steel industry responded with a new family of Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS). Traditional high strength steels, such as High-Strength Low-Alloy (HSLA), have more than three decades of press shop experience upon which to build a technology base. In contrast, users of AHSS demanded a fast track accumulation of knowledge and dissemination as they implemented these new steels. To meet this demand, experts from WorldAutoSteel pooled their knowledge to create earlier versions of these AHSS Application Guidelines covering metallurgy, forming, and joining. WorldAutoSteel is the automotive group of the World Steel Association. Version 3 of this document explained why AHSS were different from the traditional high strength steels and provided guidance on implementation procedures. Now, the umbrella of AHSS encompasses many more steel types and grades. Additional research and press shop experiences have created an even greater data pool and in-depth understanding of these unique steels. This AHSS Application Guidelines Version 4.0 continues as the leading AHSS information resource for engineers and press shop personnel alike. This version will be especially important as WorldAutoSteel companies undertake a new Future Steel Vehicle (FSV) program. Future Steel Vehicle focuses on concept designs for advanced electric, hybrid and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. The project positions steel for the future as auto body structures and material choices radically change due to these new powertrain systems. The Auto/Steel Partnership (A/SP) in North America has instituted a parallel AHSS program that conducts in-depth case studies on selected parts made from AHSS. These case studies fill a specific need for those who must critically follow the design to die tryout cycle of specific parts. These A/SP case studies are included in the appendix of this document. In addition, a joint effort by WorldAutoSteel and A/SP created a common Glossary of terms that encompass the entire field of AHSS. Other mutual interchanges of data and technology information are in progress. Our appreciation is given to the many steel company experts throughout the world who have contributed to this and previous AHSS Application Guidelines. WorldAutoSteel especially acknowledges the assistance of Murali Tumuluru of U.S. Steel Research and Technology Center, who thoroughly reviewed and updated the content of Section 3 – Joining. In addition, a special note of appreciation goes to Dr Stuart Keeler of Keeler Technologies LLC who is the Technical Editor of this document. Dr Keeler is a widely known expert, author and lecturer in the field of metal forming and application. These Guidelines and other WorldAutoSteel information can be found at www.worldautosteel.org. WorldAutoSteel companies who sponsored this work are listed on the next page.

Edward G. Opbroek Director, WorldAutoSteel World Steel Association

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page v

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Company members of the World Steel Association who work through WorldAutoSteel to sponsor this work are as follows:

......................................................................ArcelorMittal - Luxembourg ..........................................Baosteel Group Corporation - China ........................................China Steel Corporation - Taiwan, China ........................................................Hyundai Steel Company - South Korea ............................................JFE Steel Corporation - Japan ..............................................................................Kobe Steel, Ltd. - Japan ......................................Nippon Steel Corporation - Japan .................................................................................Nucor Steel - USA ............................................................................POSCO - South Korea .......................................................Severstal - Russian Federation & USA ....................................Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. - Japan

..........................................Tata Steel & Corus - India, UK, Netherlands ......................................................................ThyssenKrupp Steel AG - Germany ..................................................................United States Steel Corporation - USA .................Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A. (USIMINAS) - Brazil ...................................................voestalpine Stahl GmbH - Austria

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page vi

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Preface

Version

4.1

Section 1 General Description of AHSS

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS About a decade ago, a consortium of thirty-five steel companies worldwide undertook a massive programme to design, build, and test an UltraLight Steel Auto Body (ULSAB).W-1. ULSAB proved to be lightweight, structurally sound, safe, executable and affordable. One of the major contributors to the success of the ULSAB was a group of new steel types and grades called Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS). The AHSS family of unique microstructures typified the steel industry’s response to the demand for improved materials that utilize proven production methods. Table 1-1 illustrates a range of steel grades used in the Advanced Vehicle Concept (ULSAB-AVC) programme.

Table 1-1 - Examples of Steel Grade Properties from ULSAB-AVC.W-1

YS and UTS are minimum values Tot. EL (Total Elongation) range shows typical values for a broad range of sheet thicknesses and gauge lengths.

The main reason to utilize AHSS is their better performance in crash energy management, which allows one to down gauge with AHSS. In addition, these engineered AHSS address the automotive industry’s need for steels with higher strength and enhanced formability. The DP (Dual phase) and TRIP (Transformation induced plasticity) steels may provide additional stretchability (but not bendability) compared to conventional steels such as HSLA steels within the same strength range. The CP (Complex phase) and MS (Martensitic) steels extend the strength range while maintaining the same formability. While the ULSAB proved these AHSS provided a major benefit to the automotive industry, these steels reacted differently from traditional higher strength steels in forming and assembly. Worldwide working groups within the WorldAutoSteel organization created the AHSS Application Guidelines to explain how and why AHSS steels were different from traditional higher strength steels in terms of press-forming, fabrication, and joining processes for automotive underbody, structural, and body panels designed for higher strength steels. This Version 4 document provides in-depth information on a wide range of topics. A companion document published by the Auto/Steel PartnershipA-6 details AHSS part design and die tryout experiences with actual part case studies. Over the years since ULSAB, the successes of AHSS have motivated steel companies to continue research on both new types and grades of AHSS and then bring these new steels to production. In 2008, WorldAutoSteel began yet another programme called Future Steel VehicleW-2. This programme will benefit from the availability these new AHSS. Table 1-2 shows how the menu of steels has grown significantly.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-1

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Table 1-2 – Steel grades available for Future Steel Vehicle.W-2 sorted by yield strength

YS and UTS are minimum values Tot. EL (Total Elongation) range shows typical values for a broad range of sheet thicknesses and gauge lengths.

It is important to note that different automotive companies throughout the world have adopted different specification criteria and that steel companies have different production capabilities and commercial availability. For example, properties of hot-rolled steels can differ from cold-rolled steels. Even coating processes (Hot-Dipped Galvanize versus Hot-Dipped Galvanneal) subject the base metal to different thermal cycles that affect final properties. Therefore, the typical mechanical properties shown above simply illustrate the broad range of AHSS grades that may be available worldwide. In addition, regional test procedures will cause a systematic variation in some properties measured on the same steel sample. One example is total elongation, where measurement gauge length can be 50-mm or 80-mm plus different gauge widths depending on the worldwide region in which the test is conducted. In addition, minimum values can be defined relative to either the rolling direction or transverse direction. Therefore, communication directly with individual steel companies is imperative to determine grade availability along with specific test procedures, associated parameters, and steel properties. The following list of information is important when determining the suitability of a steel type and grade for any given part:

    

Hot-rolled, cold-rolled, and coating availability Thickness and width capabilities Chemical composition specifications Mechanical properties and ranges Joining requirements

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-2

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

1.A. Definitions Automotive steels can be classified in several different ways. One is a metallurgical designation. Common designations include low-strength steels (interstitial-free and mild steels); conventional HSS (carbonmanganese, bake hardenable, high-strength interstitial-free, and high-strength, low-alloy steels); and the newer types of AHSS (dual phase, transformation-induced plasticity, complex phase, and martensitic steels). Additional higher strength steels for the automotive market include ferritic-bainitic, twinning-induced plasticity, hot-formed, and post-forming heat-treated steels. A second classification method important to part designers is strength of the steel. Therefore, this document will use the general terms HSS and AHSS to designate all higher strength steels. In contrast, much of the current literature uses narrowly defined ranges to categorize different steel strength levels. One such system defines High-Strength Steels (HSS) as yield strengths from 210 to 550 MPa and tensile strengths from 270– 700 MPa, while Ultra-High-Strength Steels (UHSS) steels have yield strengths greater than 550 MPa and tensile strengths greater than 700 MPa. These arbitrary ranges suggest discontinuous changes in formability when moving from one category to another. However, data show property changes are a continuum across the entire span of steel strengths. In addition, many steel types have a wide range of grades covering two or more strength ranges. A third classification method presents various mechanical properties or forming parameters of different steels, such as total elongation, work hardening exponent n, or hole expansion ratio . As an example, Figure 1-1 compares total elongations – a steel property related to formability – for the different metallurgical types of steel. Figure 1-1A shows the lower strength steels in dark grey and the traditional HSS steels in light grey. Some of the early AHSS steel ellipses have colour instead of shades of gray. Figure 1-1B highlights some of the newer higher strength steels for the automotive market. Figures 1-1A and 1-1B illustrate only the relative comparison of different steel grades – not specific property ranges of each type.

Figure 1-1A - Schematic of AHSS steels (shown in colour) compared to low strength steels (dark grey) and traditional HSS (light grey).W-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-3

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Figure 1-1B – Schematic of newer higher strength steels utilizing unique chemistries, processing, and microstructure to gain specific properties and forming characteristics.W-2

The principal difference between conventional HSS and AHSS is their microstructure. Conventional HSS are single-phase ferritic steels. AHSS are primarily steels with a microstructure containing a phase other than ferrite, pearlite - for example martensite, bainite, austenite, and/or retained austenite in quantities sufficient to produce unique mechanical properties. Some types of AHSS have a higher strain hardening capacity resulting in a strength-ductility balance superior to conventional steels. Other types have ultra-high yield and tensile strengths and show a bake hardening behaviour. Since the terminology used to classify steel products varies considerably throughout the world, this document uses a combination of methods to define the steels. Each steel grade is identified by metallurgical type, minimum yield strength (in MPa), and minimum tensile strength (in MPa). As an example, DP 500/800 means a dual phase steel type with 500 MPa minimum yield strength and 800 MPa minimum ultimate tensile strength. The ULSAB-AVC programme W-1 used this classification system.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-4

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

1.B. Metallurgy of AHSS Manufacturers and users of steel products generally understand the fundamental metallurgy of conventional low- and high-strength steels. Section 1.C provides a brief description of common steel types. Since the metallurgy and processing of AHSS grades are somewhat novel compared to conventional steels, they are described here to provide a baseline understanding of how their remarkable mechanical properties evolve from their unique processing and structure. All AHSS are produced by controlling the cooling rate from the austenite or austenite plus ferrite phase, either on the runout table of the hot mill (for hot-rolled products) or in the cooling section of the continuous annealing furnace (continuously annealed or hot-dip coated products).

1.B.1. Dual Phase (DP) Steel

Figure 1-2 - Schematic shows islands of martensite in a matrix of ferrite.

DP steels consist of a ferritic matrix containing a hard martensitic second phase in the form of islands. Increasing the volume fraction of hard second phases generally increases the strength. DP (ferrite plus martensite) steels are produced by controlled cooling from the austenite phase (in hot-rolled products) or from the two-phase ferrite plus austenite phase (for continuously annealed cold-rolled and hot-dip coated products) to transform some austenite to ferrite before a rapid cooling transforms the remaining austenite to martensite. Depending on the composition and process route, hot-rolled steels requiring enhanced capability to resist stretching on a blanked edge (as typically measured by hole expansion capacity) can have a microstructure containing significant quantities of bainite. Figure 1-2 shows a schematic microstructure of DP steel, which contains ferrite plus islands of martensite. The soft ferrite phase is generally continuous, giving these steels excellent ductility. When these steels deform, strain is concentrated in the lower-strength ferrite phase surrounding the islands of martensite, creating the unique high work-hardening rate exhibited by these steels.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-5

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Figure 1-3 - The DP 350/600 with higher TS than the HSLA 350/450.K-1 The work hardening rate plus excellent elongation creates DP steels with much higher ultimate tensile strengths than conventional steels of similar yield strength. Figure 1-3 compares the engineering stressstrain curve for HSLA steel to a DP steel curve of similar yield strength. The DP steel exhibits higher initial work hardening rate, higher ultimate tensile strength, and lower YS/TS ratio than the similar yield strength HSLA. Additional engineering and true stress-strain curves for DP steel grades are located in Figure 2-9B. DP and other AHSS also have a bake hardening effect that is an important benefit compared to conventional higher strength steels. The bake hardening effect is the increase in yield strength resulting from elevated temperature aging (created by the curing temperature of paint bake ovens) after prestraining (generated by the work hardening due to deformation during stamping or other manufacturing process). The extent of the bake hardening effect in AHSS depends on the specific chemistry and thermal histories of the steels. Additional bake hardening information is located in Section 2.C.1.g. In DP steels, carbon enables the formation of martensite at practical cooling rates by increasing the hardenability of the steel. Manganese, chromium, molybdenum, vanadium, and nickel, added individually or in combination, also help increase hardenability. Carbon also strengthens the martensite as a ferrite solute strengthener, as do silicon and phosphorus. These additions are carefully balanced, not only to produce unique mechanical properties, but also to maintain the generally good resistance spot welding capability. However, when welding the highest strength grade (DP 700/1000) to itself, the spot weldability may require adjustments to the welding practice.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-6

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

1.B.2. Transformation-Induced Plasticity (TRIP) Steel

Figure 1-4 – Bainite and retained austenite are additional phases in TRIP steels. The microstructure of TRIP steels is retained austenite embedded in a primary matrix of ferrite. In addition to a minimum of five volume percent of retained austenite, hard phases such as martensite and bainite are present in varying amounts. TRIP steels typically require the use of an isothermal hold at an intermediate temperature, which produces some bainite. The higher silicon and carbon content of TRIP steels also result in significant volume fractions of retained austenite in the final microstructure. Figure 1-4 shows a schematic of TRIP steel microstructure.

Figure 1-5 - TRIP 350/600 with a greater total elongation than DP 350/600 and HSLA 350/450.K-1 During deformation, the dispersion of hard second phases in soft ferrite creates a high work hardening rate, as observed in the DP steels. However, in TRIP steels the retained austenite also progressively transforms to martensite with increasing strain, thereby increasing the work hardening rate at higher strain levels. This is illustrated in Figure 1-5, where the engineering stress-strain behaviour of HSLA, DP and TRIP steels of approximately similar yield strengths are compared. The TRIP steel has a lower initial work hardening rate than the DP steel, but the hardening rate persists at higher strains where work hardening of the DP begins to diminish. Additional engineering and true stress-strain curves for TRIP steel grades are located in Figure 2-9C.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-7

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

The work hardening rates of TRIP steels are substantially higher than for conventional HSS, providing significant stretch forming. This is particularly useful when designers take advantage of the high work hardening rate (and increased bake hardening effect) to design a part utilizing the as-formed mechanical properties. The high work hardening rate persists to higher strains in TRIP steels, providing a slight advantage over DP in the most severe stretch forming applications. TRIP steels use higher quantities of carbon than DP steels to obtain sufficient carbon content for stabilizing the retained austenite phase to below ambient temperature. Higher contents of silicon and/or aluminium accelerate the ferrite/bainite formation. Thus, these elements assist in maintaining the necessary carbon content within the retained austenite. Suppressing the carbide precipitation during bainitic transformation appears to be crucial for TRIP steels. Silicon and aluminium are used to avoid carbide precipitation in the bainite region. The strain level at which retained austenite begins to transform to martensite is controlled by adjusting the carbon content. At lower carbon levels, the retained austenite begins to transform almost immediately upon deformation, increasing the work hardening rate and formability during the stamping process. At higher carbon contents, the retained austenite is more stable and begins to transform only at strain levels beyond those produced during forming. At these carbon levels, the retained austenite persists into the final part. It transforms to martensite during subsequent deformation, such as a crash event. TRIP steels therefore can be engineered or tailored to provide excellent formability for manufacturing complex AHSS parts or exhibit high work hardening during crash deformation for excellent crash energy absorption. The additional alloying requirements of TRIP steels degrade their resistance spot-welding behaviour. This can be addressed somewhat by modification of the welding cycles used (for example, pulsating welding or dilution welding).

1.B.3. Complex Phase (CP) Steel

CP steels typify the transition to steel with very high ultimate tensile strengths. The microstructure of CP steels contains small amounts of martensite, retained austenite and pearlite within the ferrite/bainite matrix. An extreme grain refinement is created by retarded recrystallization or precipitation of microalloying elements like Ti or Cb. In comparison to DP steels, CP steels show significantly higher yield strengths at equal tensile strengths of 800 MPa and greater. CP steels are characterized by high energy absorption and high residual deformation capacity. Engineering and true stress-strain curves for CP steel grades are located in Figure 2-9D.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-8

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

1.B.4. Martensitic (MS) Steel

To create MS steels, the austenite that exists during hot-rolling or annealing is transformed almost entirely to martensite during quenching on the run-out table or in the cooling section of the continuous annealing line. The MS steels are characterized by a martensitic matrix containing small amounts of ferrite and/or bainite. Within the group of multiphase steels, MS steels show the highest tensile strength level. This structure also can be developed with post-forming heat treatment. MS steels provide the highest strengths, up to 1700 MPa ultimate tensile strength. MS steels are often subjected to post-quench tempering to improve ductility, and can provide adequate formability even at extremely high strengths. Engineering and true stressstrain curves for MS steel grades are located in Figure 2-9E. Adding carbon to MS steels increases hardenability and strengthens the martensite. Manganese, silicon, chromium, molybdenum, boron, vanadium, and nickel are also used in various combinations to increase hardenability. MS steels are produced from the austenite phase by rapid quenching to transform most of the austenite to martensite. CP steels also follow a similar cooling pattern, but the chemistry of MS steel is adjusted to produce less retained austenite and form fine precipitates to strengthen the martensite and bainite phases.

1.B.5. Ferritic-Bainitic (FB) Steel

FB steels sometimes are utilized to meet specific customer application requirements defining Stretch Flangeable (SF) or High Hole Expansion (HHE) capabilities for improved edge stretch capability. FB steels have a microstructure of fine ferrite and bainite. Strengthening is obtained by both grain refinement and second phase hardening with bainite. FB steels are available as hot-rolled products.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-9

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

The primary advantage of FB steels over HSLA and DP steels is the improved stretchability of sheared edges as measured by the hole expansion test . Compared to HSLA steels with the same level of strength, FB steels also have a higher strain hardening exponent (n) and increased total elongation. Because of their good weldability, FB steels are considered for tailored blank applications. These steels also are characterized by both good crash performances and good fatigue properties.

1.B.6. Twinning-Induced Plasticity (TWIP) Steel

TWIP steelsC-4 have a high manganese content (17-24%) that causes the steel to be fully austenitic at room temperatures. A large amount of deformation is driven by the formation of deformation twins. This deformation mode leads to the naming of this steel class. The twinning causes a high value of the instantaneous hardening rate (n value) as the microstructure becomes finer and finer. The resultant twin boundaries act like grain boundaries and strengthen the steel. TWIP steels combine extremely high strength with extremely high stretchability. The n value increases to a value of 0.4 at an approximate engineering strain of 30% and then remains constant until both uniform and total elongation reach 50%. The tensile strength is higher than 1000 MPa.

1.B.7. Hot-Formed (HF) Steel

The implementation of press-hardening applications and the utilization of hardenable steels are promising alternatives for optimized part geometries with complex shapes and no springback issues. Boron-based hot-forming steels (between 0.002% and 0.005% boron) have been in use since the 1990s in body-in-white construction. A typical minimum temperature of 850 °C must be maintained during the forming process (austenitization) followed by a cooling rate greater than 50 °C/s to ensure that the desired mechanical properties are achieved.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-10

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Two types of press-hardening or hot forming applications are currently available: 1. Direct Hot-Forming 2. Indirect Hot-Forming During Direct Hot-Forming, all deformation of the blank is done in the high temperature austenitic range followed by quenching. Indirect Hot-Forming preforms the blank at room temperature to a high percentage of the final part shape followed by additional high temperature forming and quenching. Five process stages with different mechanical properties are important for Direct Hot-Forming:  Stage 1 (ellipse 1): Room temperature blanking: Yield strengths at 340 - 480 MPa, tensile strengths up to 600 MPa, and elongations greater than 18 % must be considered for the design of blanking dies.  Stage 2 (ellipse 1): Blank heating: The blank is heated to about 850 - 900 °C.  Stage 3 (ellipse 2): High temperature forming in the die: High elongations (more than 50%) and low strengths (almost a constant 40-90 MPa true stress) at deformation temperatures allow extensive forming at low strengths.  Stage 4 (ellipse 2): Quenching in the die: Following forming, tensile strengths above 1500 MPa and total elongations of 4 - 8% (martensitic microstructure) develop during part quenching in the die.  Stage 5 (ellipse 3): Post-forming operations: Because of the very high strength, special processes are necessary when finishing the product (special cutting and trimming devices, etc.). In contrast, most of the forming during Indirect Hot-Forming is accomplished at room temperature.  Stage 1 (ellipse 1): Room temperature blanking,  Stage 2 (ellipse 1): Preforming most of the final part shape at room temperature with a traditional press and die. As with all room temperature forming, as-received sheet metal properties (yield strengths of 340 - 480 MPa, tensile strengths up to 600 MPa, and elongations greater than 18 %) may constrain maximum formability.  Stage 3 (ellipse 1): Part heating: The part is heated to about 850 - 900 °C.  Stage 4 (ellipse 2): Final high temperature part forming at low strength and high elongations.  Stage 5 (ellipse 3): Quenching in the die: Complex parts with tensile strengths above 1500 MPa, total elongations of 6 - 8% (martensitic microstructure) and zero springback develop during quenching in the die. True stress-strain curves for common boron-based HF steel in both the as-received room temperature condition and after quenching to final strength condition are located in Figure 2-10. Additional information on the hot-forming process is available in Section 2.C.3.e.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-11

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

1.B.8. Post-Forming Heat-Treatable (PFHT) Steel

Post-forming heat treatment is a general method to develop an alternative higher strength steel. The major issue holding back widespread implementation of HSS typically has been maintaining part geometry during and after the heat treatment process. Fixturing the part and then heating (furnace or induction) and immediate quenching appear to be a solution with production applications. In addition, the stamping is formed at a lower strength (ellipse 1) and then raised to a much higher strength by heat treatment (ellipse 2). One process is water quenching of inexpensive steels with chemistries that allow in-part strengths between 900 and 1400 MPa tensile strength. In addition, some zinc coatings can survive the heat treating cycle because the time at temperature is very short. The wide assortment of chemistries to meet specific part specifications requires extra special coordination with the steel supplier. Another process is air-hardening of alloyed tempering steels that feature very good forming properties in the soft-state (deep-drawing properties) and high strength after heat treatment (air-hardening). Apart from direct application as sheet material, air-hardening steels are suitable for tube welding. These tubes are excellent for hydroforming applications. The components can be heat treated in the furnace in a protective gas atmosphere (austenitized) and then hardened and tempered during natural cooling in air or a protective gas. The very good hardenability and resistance to tempering is achieved by adding, in addition to carbon and manganese, other alloying elements such as chrome, molybdenum, vanadium, boron, and titanium. The steel is very easy to weld in both its soft and air-hardened states, as well as in the combination of soft/ air-hardened. This steel responds well to coating using standard coating methods (conventional batch galvanizing and high-temperature batch galvanizing). A third option is in-die quenching. A version of Indirect Hot-Forming (described in 1.B.7.) completes all forming of the part at room temperature, heats the part to about 850 - 900º C, and then uses a water cooled die to quench the part to martensite. This process is called Form Hardening.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-12

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

1.B.9. Evolving AHSS Types In response to automotive demands for additional AHSS capabilities, research laboratories in the steel industry and academic institutions continue to search for new types of steel. Figure 1-6 shows one area of current research. The large gray ellipse is one area between the traditional AHSS and the high percentage austenitic-based steels (A) being researched for future steel types. The goal of this research area is improving formability for a given strength range while reducing the cost and welding problems associated with the high percentage austenitic steels. Other examples of these developing steels are ultrafine grain, low density, and high Young’s modulus steels.

Figure 1-6 - Schematic with large, dark grey ellipse indicating one current area of research for steels with improved properties, reduced cost, and improved weldability.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-13

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

1.C. Conventional Low- and High-Strength Automotive Sheet Steels 1.C.1. Mild steels Mild steels have an essentially ferritic microstructure. Drawing Quality (DQ) and Aluminium Killed (AKDQ) steels are examples and often serve as a reference base because of their widespread application and production volume.

1.C.2. Interstitial-free (IF) steels (Low strength and high strength) IF steels have ultra-low carbon levels designed for low yield strengths and high work hardening exponents. These steels have more stretchability than Mild steels. Some grades of IF steels utilize a combination of elements for solid solution strengthening, precipitation of carbides and/or nitrides, and grain refinement. Another common element added to increase strength is phosphorous (another solid solution strengthener). The higher strength grades of IF steel are widely used for both structural and closure applications.

1.C.3. Bake hardenable (BH) steels BH steels have a basic ferritic microstructure and solid solution strengthening. A unique feature of these steels is the chemistry and processing designed to keep carbon in solution during steelmaking and then allowing this carbon to come out of solution during paint baking or several weeks at room temperature. This increases the yield strength of the formed part for increased dent resistance.

1.C.4. Isotropic (IS) steels IS steels have a basic ferritic type of microstructure. The key aspect of these steels is the delta r-value near zero, resulting in minimized earing tendencies.

1.C.5. Carbon-manganese (CM) steels Higher strength CM steels utilize solid solution strengthening.

1.C.6. High-strength low-alloy (HSLA) steels This group of steels increase strength primarily by micro-alloying elements contributing to fine carbide precipitation and grain-size refinement.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 1-14

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 1 - General Description of AHSS

Version

4.1

Section 2 For ming

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Section 2 - Forming 2.A. General Comments Forming of AHSS is not a radical change from forming conventional HSS. The major acquisition of new knowledge and experience needed for forming higher strength steels in general increased gradually over the years as ever-increasing strengths became available in the HSLA grades. Now new demands for improved crash performance, while reducing mass and cost, have spawned a new group of steels that improve on the current conventional base of HSS. The AHSS solve two distinct automotive needs by two different groups of steels. The first group as a class has higher strength levels with improved formability and crash-energy absorption compared to the current HSLA grades. This requirement is fulfilled by the DP and TRIP grades of steel, which have increased values of the work hardening exponent. The second is to extend the availability of steel in strength ranges above the HSLA grades. This area is covered by the CP and MS grades. Originally targeted only for chassis, suspension, and body-in-white components, AHSS are now being applied to doors and other body panels. Additional steels highlighted previously in Figure 1-1B are designed to meet specific process requirements. These include increased edge stretch flangeability, strengthening after forming, or increased springback tolerances. The improved capabilities the AHSS bring to the automotive industry do not bring new forming problems but certainly accentuate problems already existing with the application of any higher strength steel. These concerns include higher loads on presses and tools, greater energy requirements, and increased need for springback compensation and control. In addition, AHSS have greater tendency to wrinkle due to lack of adequate holddown and often a reduction in sheet thickness. The Applications Guidelines document utilizes a steel designation system to minimize regional confusion about the mechanical properties when comparing AHSS to conventional high-strength steels. The format is Steel Type YS/TS in MPa. Therefore, HSLA 350/450 would have minimum yield strength of 350 MPa and minimum tensile strength of 450 MPa. The designation also highlights different yield strengths for steel grades with equal tensile strengths, thereby allowing some assessment of the stress-strain curves and amount of work hardening. Matching exact mechanical properties of the intended steel grade against the critical forming mode in the stamping not only requires an added level of knowledge by steel suppliers and steel users, but also mandates an increased level of communication between them. A specific example is total elongation versus local elongation. Total elongation has been the traditional measure of the steel’s general stretchability over wide areas of the stamping – the required length of line deformation. Now, local elongation over very small gauge lengths found in stretch flanging, hole expansion, and blanked edge extension is as important as total elongation. The modification of microstructure to create DP and TRIP steels for increased work hardening exponent, greater stretchability and crash energy absorption, and higher total elongations reduces local elongation and edge stretchability – and vice versa. New emphasis is being placed on determining specific needs of the stamping, highlighting critical forming modes, and identifying essential mechanical properties. The interaction of all inputs to the forming system means the higher loads and energy needs of AHSS also place new requirements on press capacity, tool construction/protection, lubricant capabilities, process design, and maintenance. To this end, the Forming Section of these Guidelines addresses the mechanical properties, forming limits, and forming modes before covering the more traditional areas of tooling, springback, and press loads. Most data and experience are available for DP steels that have been in production and automotive use for some time. Less experience has been acquired with the TRIP steels that are now transitioning from the research phase to production.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-1

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.B. Computerized Forming-Process Development Using software to evaluate sheet metal formability has been in industrial use (as opposed to university and research environments) for more than a decade. The current sheet metal forming programs are part of a major transition to virtual manufacturing that includes analysis of welding, casting solidification, molding of sheet/fibre compounds, automation, and other manufacturing processes. Computer simulation of sheet metal forming is identified more correctly as computerized forming-process development or even computerized die tryout. The more highly developed software programs closely duplicate the forming of sheet metal stampings as they would be done physically in the press shop. For conventional steels, these programs have proven to be very accurate in blank movement, strains, thinning, forming severity, wrinkles, and buckles. Prediction of springback generally provides qualitatively helpful results. However, the magnitude of the springback probably will lack some accuracy and will depend highly on the specific stamping, the input information, and user experience. Traditionally the software uses the simple power law of work hardening that treats the n value as a constant. For use with AHSS, the codes should treat the n value as a function of strain. Most commercial software now have the ability to process the true stress – true strain curve for the steel being evaluated without the need for a constitutive equation. However, this capability is not present in some proprietary industrial and university software and caution must be taken before using this software to analyze stampings formed from AHSS. Computerized forming-process development is ideally suited to the needs of current and potential users of AHSS. A full range of analysis capabilities is available to evaluate AHSS as a new stamping analysis or to compare AHSS stampings to conventional Mild steel stampings. These programs allow rapid what-if scenarios to explore different grades of AHSS, alternative processing, or even design optimization. The potential involvement of software-based AHSS process development is shown in Figure 2-1. At the beginning of the styling to production cycle, the key question is whether the stamping can even be made. With only the CAD file of the final part and material properties, the One-Step or Inverse codes can rapidly ascertain strain along section lines, thinning, forming severity, trim line-to-blank, hot spots, blank contour, and other key information.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-1 - Schematic showing utilization of computerized forming-process development to assist in forming stampings from AHSS.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-2

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

During selection of process and die design parameters, the software will evaluate how each new input not only affects the outputs listed in the previous paragraph, but also will show wrinkles and generate a pressloading curve. The most useful output of the analysis is observing (similar to a video) the blank being deformed into the final part through a transparent die. Each frame of the video is equivalent to an incremental hit or breakdown stamping. Problem areas or defects in the final increment of forming can be traced backwards through the forming stages to the initiation of the problem. The most comprehensive software allows analysis of multi-stage forming, such as progressive dies, transfer presses, or tandem presses. The effects of trimming and other offal removal on the springback of the part are documented. Since many applications of AHSS involve load bearing or crash analyses, computerized forming-process development has special utilization in structural analysis. Previously the part and assembly designs were analyzed for static and dynamic capabilities using CAD stampings with initial sheet thickness and as-received yield strength. Often the tests results from real parts did not agree with the early analyses because real parts were not analyzed. Now virtual parts are generated with point-to-point sheet thickness and strength levels nearly identical to those that will be tested when the physical tooling is constructed. Deficiencies of the virtual parts can be identified and corrected by tool, process, or even part-design before tool construction has even begun. The Case Studies located in the Appendix provide excellent examples of computerized forming process development. Here slides showing different types of formability analysis identify problem areas in forming and springback plus the corrections needed for successful parts. These analyses are conducted before any dies are cut, which greatly facilitates downstream reductions in time and cost.

2.C. Sheet Forming 2.C.1. Mechanical Properties By combining a number of different microstructures not traditionally found in conventional HSS, a wide range of properties are possible with AHSS. This allows steel companies to tailor the processing to meet the ever more focused application requirements demanded by the automotive industry. Comparing these AHSS to their conventional HSS counterparts becomes much more difficult. The same minimum tensile strength can be found with a variety of steel types having different yield strengths. One example is TRIP 450/800, DP 500/800, and CP 700/800 steels with the same minimum tensile strength but with different yield strengths and typical total elongations in the range of 29%, 17%, and 13%, respectively. Some AHSS steels have their properties determined when the steel is produced. However, the properties of TRIP change during deformation as the retained austenite transforms to islands of martensite. The amount and rate of this transformation depends on the type and amount of deformation, the strain rate, the temperature of the sheet metal, and other conditions unique to the specific part, tool, and press. In contrast, a large range of HF and PFHT steel types generate their final properties though some form of quench operation only after forming has been completed. AHSS property data contained in this section illustrate general trends and reasons why these trends differ from conventional HSS. Specific data can only be obtained by selecting the exact type, grade, and thickness of AHSS and then contacting the steel supplier for properties expected with their processing of the order. Data for the newer TWIP, FB, and HT steels are limited and therefore are only briefly noted.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-3

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.1.a. Yield Strength - Total Elongation Relationships A large range of yield strengths is available for the AHSS. Stretching is related to the total elongation obtained in a standard tensile test. Figure 2-2 shows the general relationship between yield strength and total elongation for AHSS compared to other high-strength steels.

Figure 2-2 - Relationship between yield strength and total elongation (50.8 mm gauge length) for various types of steel.I-1 Note that the families of DP, CP, and TRIP steels generally have higher total elongations than HSLA steels of equal yield strengths. Most AHSS steels have no yield point elongation. Some samples of higher strength DP grades and TRIP steels may show YPE but the value typically should be less than 1%. These values are in contrast with various HSLA grades, which can have YPE values greater than 5%.

2.C.1.b. Tensile Strength - Total Elongation Relationships The relationship between ultimate tensile strength and total elongation for the various types of steels in Figure 2-3 parallels that observed in Figure 2-2.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-3 - Relationship between ultimate tensile strength and total elongation (50.8 mm gauge length) for various types of steel.I-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-4

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

When ordering steel based on tensile strength, the DP, CP, and TRIP steels in general still have higher total elongations than HSLA steels of equal tensile strengths. Total elongation information for the newer TWIP, FB, HF, and PFHT steels are presented in Section 1, Figure 1-1B.

2.C.1.c. Work Hardening Exponent (n-value) Sheet metal stretchability is strongly influenced by the work hardening exponent or n-value. The capabilities of the n-value are schematically illustrated in Figure 2-4.

Figure 2-4 - Schematic showing the safety margin between allowable FLC strain for a higher nvalue (solid line) and a lower n-value (dashed line).

The n-value is the key parameter in determining the maximum allowable stretch as determined by the Forming Limit Curve (FLC). The height of the FLC is directly proportional to the terminal n-value as discussed later. The n-value also contributes to the ability of steel to distribute the strain more uniformly in the presence of a stress gradient. The higher the n-value, the flatter the strain gradient. A higher n-value (solid lines in Figure 2-4) compared to a lower n-value (dashed lines) means a deeper part can be stretched for equal safety margins or a larger safety margin for equal depth parts.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-5

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

The decreasing n-value with increasing yield strength for conventional HSS (Figure 2-5) limits the application of some HSS.

Figure 2-5 - Experimental relationship between n-value (work hardening exponent measured from 10 to 20% strain) and engineering yield stress for a wide range of Mild steel and conventional HSS types and grades.K-2

Unfortunately, comparison of n-value for DP steel to HSLA steel requires more than comparing the two single values of n for a given yield strength. The following tensile test data show why. In one study, the HSLA 350/450 has a 0.14 n-value and the DP 350/600 has an identical 0.14 n-value in a standard test procedure measuring the n-value over a strain range of 10% to 20%. No differences are reported, which is contrary to increased stretchability gained when using DP steels. On the other hand, a number of different DP steels showing a wide range of n-values were observed for a given strength level. Unlike the HSLA 350/450 steel that has an approximately constant n-value over most of its strain range, the n-value for the DP 350/600 starts higher and then decreases with increasing strain as the initial effect of the original martensite islands is diminished. To capture this behaviour, the instantaneous n-value as a function of strain must be determined.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-6

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-6 - Instantaneous n values versus strain for DP 350/600 and HSLA 350/450 steels.K-1 The instantaneous n-value curves for the HSLA 350/450 and DP 350/600 shown in Figure 2-6 clearly indicate the higher n-value for DP steel for strain values less than 7%. The higher initial n-value tends to restrict the onset of strain localization and growth of sharp strain gradients. Minimization of sharp gradients in the length of line also reduces the amount of localized sheet metal thinning. The approximately constant n-value plateau extending beyond the 10% strain range provides the terminal or high strain n-value. This terminal n-value is a major input in determining the maximum allowable strain in stretching as defined by the forming limit curve. This reduction in thinning for a channel is presented in Figure 2-7. Substitution of DP 350/600 for HSLA 350/ 450 reduced the maximum thinning from 25% to 20%. The instantaneous n-values for these two steels are shown in Figure 2-6.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-7 - Thinning strain distribution for a channel produced with DP and HSLA steels.S-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-7

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Unlike the DP steels where the increase in n-value is restricted to the low strain-values, the TRIP steels constantly create new islands of martensite as the steel is deformed to higher strain-values. These new martensite islands maintain the high value of n as shown in Figure 2-8.

Figure 2-8 - Instantaneous n values versus strain for TRIP, DP, and HSLA steels.K-1 The continued high n-value of the TRIP steel relative to the HSLA steel contributes to the increase in total elongation observed in Figures 2-2 and 2-3. The increased n-value at higher strain levels further restricts strain localization and increases the height of the forming limit curve. The n values for TWIP have been described C-4 as increasing to 0.4 at an approximate strain of 30% due to the twinning mode of deformation and then remaining constant until a total elongation of 52%. In contrast, the formability properties of the HF steels are only developed after the blanks reach operating temperature.

2.C.1.d. Stress-Strain Curves Stress-strain curves are extremely valuable for comparing different steel types and even different grades within a single type of steel. Engineering stress–engineering strain curves are developed using initial gage length and initial cross-sectional area of the specimen. These curves highlight yield point elongation, ultimate tensile strength, uniform elongation, total elongation, and other strain events. In contrast, the true stress– true strain curves are based on instantaneous gage length and instantaneous cross-sectional area of the specimen. Therefore, the area under the curve up to a specific strain is proportional to the energy required to create that level of strain or the energy absorbed (crash management) when that level of strain is imparted to a part. Figure 9 is a collection of typical stress-strain curves – both engineering and true – for different grades of HSLA, DP, TRIP, CP, and MS steels. True stress-strain curves only are presented for HF steels in Figure 2-10. A typical stress-strain curve for Mild steel is included in each graph for reference purposes. This will permit one to compare potential forming parameters, press loads, press energy requirements, and other parameters when switching among different steel types and grades.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-8

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-9A – Engineering stress-strain (upper graphic) and true stress-strain (lower graphic) curves for a series of cold-rolled HSLA steel grades.S-5

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-9

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-9B – Engineering stress-strain (upper graphic) and true stress-strain (lower graphic) curves for a series of DP steel grades.S-5, V-1 Sheet thicknesses: DP 250/450 and DP 500/800 = 1.0mm. All other steels were 1.8-2.0mm.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-10

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-9C – Engineering stress-strain (upper graphic) and true stress-strain (lower graphic) curves for a series of TRIP steel grades.V-1 Sheet thickness: TRIP 350/600 = 1.2mm, TRIP 450/700 = 1.5mm, TRIP 500/750 = 2.0mm, and Mild Steel = approx. 1.9mm.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-11

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-9D – Engineering stress-strain (upper graphic) and true stress-strain (lower graphic) curves for a series of CP steel grades.V-1 Sheet thickness: CP650/850 = 1.5mm, CP 800/1000 = 0.8mm, CP 1000/1200 = 1.0mm, and Mild Steel = approx. 1.9mm.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-12

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-9E – Engineering stress-strain (upper graphic) and true stress-strain (lower graphic) curves for a series of MS steel grades.S-5 All Sheet thicknesses were 1.8-2.0mm.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-13

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-10 – True stress-strain curves for different sheet thickness of as-received boron-based HF steel tested at room temperature (upper curve) and tested after heat treatment and quenching (lower curve).V-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-14

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.1.e. Normal Anisotropy Ratio (

or rm)

The normal anisotropy ratio (rm) defines the ability of the metal to deform in the thickness direction relative to deformation in the plane of the sheet. For rm values greater than one, the sheet metal resists thinning. Values greater than one improve cup drawing, hole expansion, and other forming modes where metal thinning is detrimental. High-strength steels with UTS greater than 450 MPa and hot-rolled steels have rm values approximating one. Therefore, HSS and AHSS at similar yield strengths perform equally in forming modes influenced by the rm value. However, r-value for higher strength grades of AHSS (800 MPa or higher) can be lower than one and any performance influenced by r-value would be not as good as HSLA of similar strength.

2.C.1.f. Strain Rate Effects To characterize the strain rate sensitivity, medium strain rate tests were conducted at strain rates ranging from 10-3/sec (commonly found in tensile tests) to 103/sec. For reference, 101/sec approximates the strain rate observed in a typical stamping. As expected, the results showed that YS (Figure 2-11) and UTS (Figure 2-12) increase with increasing strain rate.

Figure 2-11 - Increase in yield stress as a function of strain rate.Y-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-15

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-12 - Increase in tensile stress as a function of strain rate.Y-1 However, up to a strain rate of 101/sec, both the YS and UTS only increased about 16-20 MPa per order of magnitude increase in strain rate. These increases are less than those measured for low strength steels. This means the YS and UTS values active in the sheet metal are somewhat greater than the reported quasistatic values traditionally reported. However, the change in YS and UTS from small changes in press strokes per minute are very small and are less than the changes experienced from one coil to another. The change in n-value with increase in strain rate is shown in Figure 2-13. Steels with YS greater than 300 MPa have an almost constant n-value over the full strain rate range, although some variation from one strain rate magnitude to another is possible.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-13 - Relationship between n-value and strain rate showing relatively no overall increase.Y-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-16

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-14 shows the true stress-true strain curves at several strain rates for HF steel after heat treatment and quenching. The yield stress increases approximately five MPa for one order of magnitude increase in strain rate.

Figure 2-14 – Extended true stress-strain curves for different strain rates.V-1 Steel is 1.0 mm thick HF after heat treatment and quenching.

2.C.1.g. Bake Hardening and Aging Strain aging was measured using typical values for an automotive paint/bake cycle consisting of 2% uniaxial pre-strain followed by baking at 170 oC for 30 minutes. Figure 2-15 defines the measurement for work hardening (B minus A), unloading to C for baking, and reloading to yielding at D for measurement of bake hardening (D minus B).

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-15 - Measurement of work hardening index and bake hardening index.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-17

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-16 shows the work hardening and bake hardening increases for the 2% prestrained and baked tensile specimen. The HSLA shows little or no bake hardening, while AHSS such as DP and TRIP steels show a large positive bake hardening index. The DP steel also has significantly higher work hardening than HSLA or TRIP steel because of higher strain hardening at low strains. No aging behaviour of AHSS has been observed due to storage of as-received coils or blanks over a significant length of time at normal room temperatures. Hence, significant mechanical property changes of shipped AHSS products during normal storage conditions are unlikely.

Figure 2-16 - Comparison of work hardening (WH) and bake hardening (BH) for TRIP, DP, and HSLA steels given a 2% prestrain.S-1, K-3

2.C.1.h. Key Points  AHSS generally have greater total elongations compared to conventional HSS of equal ultimate      

tensile strengths. DP steels have increased n-values in the initial stages of deformation compared to HSS. These higher n-values help distribute deformation more uniformly in the presence of a stress gradient and thereby reduce local thinning. TRIP steels have less initial increase in n-value than DP steels but sustain the increase throughout the entire deformation process. These AHSS can have n-values comparable to Mild steels. Most cold-rolled and coated AHSS and HSS steels with UTS greater than 450 MPa and all hotrolled steels have normal anisotropy values (rm) around a value of one. YS and UTS for AHSS increase only about 16-20 MPa per ten-fold increase in strain rate, which is less than Mild steel increases. The n-value changes very little over a 105 increase in strain rate. As-received AHSS does not age-harden in storage. DP and TRIP steels have substantial increase in YS due to a bake hardening effect, while HSLA steels have almost none.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-18

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.2. Forming Limits Knowledge of forming limits is important throughout the entire product design to production cycle. First is the computerized forming-process development (virtual die tryout), which requires forming limits for the selected steel type and grade to assess the forming severity (hot spots) for each point on the stamping. Next is the process and tool design stage where specific features of the tooling are established and again computervalidated against forming limits for the specific steel. Troubleshooting tools for die tryout on the press shop floor utilize forming limits to assess the final severity of the part and to track process improvements. Finally, forming limits are used to track part severity throughout the production life of the part as the tooling undergoes both intentional (engineering) modifications and unintentional (wear) changes. This sub-section presents three different types of forming limits. First is the traditional forming limit curve that applicable to all modes of sheet metal forming. Second is a sheared edge stretching limit that applies to the problem of stretching (hole expansion, stretch flanging) the cut edge of sheet metal. Third is shear fracture encountered during small radii bending of DP and TRIP steels.

2.C.2.a. Forming Limit Curves (FLC) Forming limit curves (FLC) are used routinely in many areas around the world during the design, tryout, and production stages of a stamping. An FLC is a map of strains that indicate the onset of critical local necking for different strain paths, represented by major and minor strains. These critical strains not only become the limit of useful deformation but are also the points below which safety margins are calculated. Experimental determination of FLCs involves forming sheet specimens of different widths to generate different strain paths and measuring the different critical strains. Considerable prior work has been done with respect to characterizing the minimum value of the FLC as a function on n-value and thickness for different steel types and grades. One equation for FLC0 is given in Figure 2-17. Regional differences may be observed in the generation, shape, and application of forming limit curves.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-19

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Examples of experimental FLCs are shown in Figure 2-17 for Mild Steel 170/300, HSLA 350/450, and DP 350/600 with sheet thicknesses equal to 1.2 mm. All three curves have approximately the same shape and the minimum value of the major strain generally is predictable from the FLC0 equation. Since the HSLA and DP steels have approximately the same terminal (high strain) n value (Figure 2-6), the identical FLCs were expected. The Mild Steel has an elevated FLC because its terminal n value is substantially higher than the HSLA and DP steels tested.

Figure 2-17- Experimental FLCs for one sample each of Mild, HSLA, and DP steels with thicknesses equal to 1.2 mm.K-1

Determination of FLCs for TRIP and MS steels (Figure 2-18) present additional problems and need further development. For example, the terminal n value of the TRIP steels depends strongly on different chemistries and processing used by different steel producers. In addition, the terminal n value is a function of the strain history of the stamping that determines the transformation of retained austenite to martensite. Since different locations in a stamping follow different strain paths (balanced biaxial, plane strain, uniaxial tension, compression, etc.) and varying amounts of deformation, the terminal n for TRIP steel could vary not only from part design to part design but also with location within the part. The MS steels have very little available deformation, which makes generation of FLCs difficult.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-20

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-18 – Preliminary experimental FLCs for a t=1.2 mm TRIP steel and a t=1.5 mm MS steel.K-1, C-1 With only minor differences in sheet thickness, the height of the FLC0 is primarily a function of the terminal work hardening exponent (n). The approximately constant n-value extending beyond the 10% strain range provides a measure of the terminal or high strain n-value. The measured properties of the steels presented in Figures 2-17 and 2-18 are listed in Table 2-1.

Table 2-1 - Properties of steels in Figures 2-17 and 2-18.K-1, C-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-21

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Both HSLA 350/450 and DP 350/600 steels have terminal n-values (measured at high values of strain) equal to 0.17. Therefore, the FLC0 values are equal as shown in Figure 2-17. These two steels have approximately the same YS and total elongations but the UTS values are very different. More interesting are the Mild 170/300 and TRIP 400/600 steels. Both have terminal n values of 0.23. However, the FLC0 equation shown in Figure 2-17 currently cannot be applied to TRIP steels and must be further researched. The modified microstructures of the AHSS allow different property relationships to tailor each steel type and grade to specific application needs. Even more important is the requirement to obtain property data from the steel supplier for the types and grades being considered for specific applications.

2.C.2.b. Sheared Edge Stretching Limits Extensive research work has been conducted in various parts of the world to study the capability of steel to withstand tensile stretching on sheared edges. This sheared edge can be created at many different times during the transition from steel mill to final assembly. These include coil slitting, blanking (straight and contour), offal trimming (external edges or internal cut-outs), hole punching, and other operations. Tensile stretching is most commonly created during hole expansion and stretch flanging. In terms of deformation mode, the edge simulates a tensile test with similar width and thickness reductions. The studies showed that the sheared edges had less stretchability compared to the rest of the stamping. The explanation was a reduction in the work hardening exponent or n-value of the edge metal due to cold work created during the cutting operation. With the increased application of AHSS, stampings made from DP and TRIP steels showed yet another type of problem. Stretch flanging and hole expansion generated edge cracks at low strains – even for edges that had been milled to remove all of the cold work zone. The reduction in stretchability was evident in hole expansion tests. To understand the problem better, Table 2-2 describes the various forming modes and their formability limitations

Table 2-2 – Forming sequence for four different forming modes.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-22

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

The tensile test (column A in Table 2-2) is the source for much of the mechanical property data. The milled edges of the tensile sample remove any cold worked zones that lead to early crack initiation. However, during the test a load maximum occurs due to work hardening becoming equal to geometrical softening. At this load maximum (UTS), a diffuse (width) neck localizes deformation within the neck and the remainder of the specimen terminates further deformation under the reducing load. Deformation continues in the diffuse neck until a local (narrow through thickness) neck initiates. All further deformation localizes in the local neck until ductile failure occurs. Forming conventional steels into sheet metal stampings (column B) happens without the interference of a diffuse neck. Deformation continues until the onset of the local neck. The Forming Limit Curves discussed above in 2.C.2.a. predict the onset of the local neck. The first loss of edge stretchability (column C) occurs when a sheared (cut) edge elongates because of an applied tensile stress. However, the metal in the sheared edge zone has experienced severe cold work. The shearing can create a work-hardened zone for a distance from the sheared edge equal to one-half metal thickness. The cold work reduces the work hardening capacity of the edge metal, lowers the n-value, and reduces the permissible edge stretch. The hole expansion test (HET) quantifies this reduction in edge stretchability. Figure 2-19.schematically shows the magnitude of the reduction in the hole expansion due to hole punching compared to a milled edge.

Figure 2-19 – Schematic showing the trend in percent hole expansion for 30 ksi Mild steel due to cold work during hole punching compared to a milled hole.H-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-23

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Sheared edge stretchability is generally evaluated by two different hole expansion test methods. The first begins with clamping a flat blank containing a punched hole in the centre. A flat bottom punch with a diameter equal to the die opening is pushed into the blank. The circumference of the hole expands as the metal slides across the bottom of the punch. The second test begins with the clamping of the same flat blank with a punched hole in the centre. In this test, however, a conical punch is inserted into the hole. As the punch continues its travel, the circumference of the hole expands as a flange of increasing height is generated. When a variety of steels was tested by both methods, a correlation did exist between the two test methods. Either one could be used to compare edge stretching of different metals. However, the hole expansion test utilizing a conical punch has become the more common test because it is more simulative of a stretch flanging operation. The increase in hole diameter (or circumference) is given the symbol lambda ( ). The key to consistent data lies with the quality of the punched hole. Special efforts are needed to keep the tools sharp and damage free. Hard, wear resistant tools, preferably coated PM grade, are highly recommended. The hole expansion limits generated by a conical punch were consistently higher than the hole expansion tests created by a flat-bottom punch. Careful reproducibility of the sheared perimeter of the hole is required to run comparison tests on vastly different steels, such as AHSS and HSS. The same severe work hardening generated during the edge shearing prevents the use of traditional FLCs based on the as-received properties of the steel to determine allowable sheared edge stretching. ResearchV-1 similar to Figure 2-19 but devoted to AHSS and other HSS is presented in Figure 2-20. Note that the HE (%) can be significantly lower for punched holes compared to machined holes. This probably is due to the reduced local elongation of these multiphase steels, which can have interfacial shearing between the ductile ferrite matrix and the harder phases. A more detailed study of sheared edge stretching is available in reference K-6.

Figure 2-20 – Laboratory study shows the effect of damage (measured by a hole expansion test) done to sheet metal stretchability when a hole is punched in sheet metal compared to machining the hole.V-1 Production studies found the DP and TRIP steels had a unique type of edge stretch failure (column D in Table 2-2). These steels had early edge failure for edges pulled in tension. The cause was not cold working of the edges since milling removed all cold work. All these failures - as a group called “shear” failures tentatively have been associated with the microstructure containing islands, bands, or other configurations of martensite. Extensive research is underway to determine the root cause of these failures.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-24

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Stretch flange and hole expansion forming operations for DP and TRIP steels are more complex than Table 2-2 shows. During production of parts from these steels, a reduced edge stretchability results from both the reduction in work hardening capacity due to the cold work of cutting (column C) and the ferrite-martensite microstructure common to both these steels (column D). The standard hole expansion test with a punched hole measures both these effects. A different studyC-1 evaluated the hole expansion ratio created by hole punching tools as they wore in a production environment. The powder metallurgy (PM) tools had a 60 HRC. The tools were uncoated. Data in Figure 2-21 show the percent hole expansion from newly ground punches and dies (Sharp Tools) and from used production punches and dies (Worn Tools). The radial clearance was 0.1 mm. Only rust protection oil on the sheet was used during the punching. Aral Ropa oil was applied during the hole expansion. The poor edge condition after punching was caused by tool wear and possible microchipping. The clearance was hardly affected.

Figure 2-21 – Production tooling used to evaluate hole expansion tests using a conical punch with a 50 mm base diameter using sharp and worn tools.C-1 The conclusions from this study were: 1) When exposing a DP steel to edge deformation, make sure the best quality edge condition is utilized and the burr, if possible, should be facing inward, and 2) Use hard wearing tooling, preferably coated PM grades, for punching. Additional information on tool materials is available in 2.C.6.b. Figure 2-21 shows the combination of cold work at the sheared edge and the effect of microstructure. If no cold work were present, a gradual decrease in HE (%) would be expected as the strength moves from the single phase Mild Steel to the single phase MS. However, the HE (%) drops dramatically for the DP 350/600 and then stays approximately constant for the DP 500/800 and DP 700/1000. This behaviour would be characteristic of the change in microstructure overriding the cold work effect. To counteract this general trend of loss of edge stretching, properties of the AHSS can be further tailored to increase the sheared edge-stretching limit. AHSS gain their well-publicized improved total elongations from microstructures with unique differences in morphology, hardness, and amounts of low temperature transformation products (LTTPs). Unfortunately, these same microstructures reduce local elongations or local ductility (measured by ) that affect hole expansion, stretch flanging, and bending. This problem is shown in Figure 2-22.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-25

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-22 - Schematic showing AHSS tailored to high total elongation or high local elongation.T-1 The key to improved sheared edge stretchability is homogeneous microstructure. Such metallurgical trends include a single phase of bainite or multiple phases including bainite and removal of large particles of martensite. This trend is shown in Figure 2-23.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-23 - Improvements in hole expansion by modification of microstructure.N-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-26

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.2.c. Shear Fracture Automotive product designers utilize small radii for springback control, sectional stiffness, packaging constraints, and design features. Increased sensitivity to crack formation is observed for AHSS at small die radius to material thickness (R/t) ratios. Traditional forming limit curves or other press shop criteria do not predict these fractures. Likewise, usual forming simulations, such as computerized forming-process development, also do not flag these fractures. However, these shear fractures have occurred in die tryout. Substantial research is underway to develop one or more tests that will predict the onset of these shear failures. Reference W-3 presents angular stretch-bend test results. Reference W-4 details pulling metal strips over radii with back tension. Most of the research results show significant reduction in available deformation for different grades of DP and TRIP steels. All the research focuses on finding a procedure that will predetermine at what level of strain specific steels will fail. This information then will be entered into Computerized Forming-Process Development analyses to determine feasibility of any given part design.

2.C.2.d. Key Points Forming Limit Curves

 Differences in determination and interpretation of FLCs exist in different regions of the world. These    

Application Guidelines utilize one current system of commonly used FLCs positioned by FLC0 determined by terminal n and t. This system of FLCs commonly used for low strength and conventional HSS is generally applicable to experimental FLCs obtained for DP steels. The left side of the FLC (negative minor strains) is in good agreement with experimental data for DP and TRIP steels. The left side depicts a constant thinning strain as a forming limit. Data for 1.2 mm steels shows the FLCs for HSLA 350/450 and DP 350/600 overlap. Determination of FLCs for TRIP, MS, TWIP, and other special steels present measurement and interpretation problems and need further development.

Sheared Edge Stretching Limits

 Sheared edge stretching limits are important for hole expansion and stretch flanging. All steels have 



reduced hole expansion limits caused by the cold work and reduced n-value of the metal adjacent to the cut edge. The hole expansion limits for milled edges of DP and TRIP steels suffer an additional reduction because of shear cracking associated with the interfaces between the ductile ferrite and the hard martensite phase in the microstructure. This reduction becomes more severe as the volume of martensite increases for increased strength. The microstructure of AHSS can be modified to enhance either total elongation for general stretch forming or local elongation for sheared edge stretching limits. The same microstructure generally does not provide high values for both total and local elongation values. However, some increases in both can be created to provide a balance of total and local elongation.

Shear Fractures

 Early shear type fractures have been encountered without a sheared edge when a small tool radius to sheet thickness (r/t ratio) is encountered within a stamping.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

 Shear fractures are not predicted by the forming limit curve or computerized forming-process development.

 A number of research programs are attempting to develop a new bending test that will quantify when these failures will occur in any specific sheet metal.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-27

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.3. Forming Modes Part designers are interested in the forming capabilities of the steels they specify. This is true of HSS and even more so for AHSS. Unfortunately, complex stampings are composed of several different basic forming modes, which react to a different set of mechanical properties. Likewise, formability of steel, and especially AHSS, cannot be characterized by a single number. Therefore, formability comparisons of AHSS to conventional HSS must be done for each basic forming mode. In this section, three general groups (stretching, cup drawing, bending/roll forming) are reviewed.

2.C.3.a. Stretching As a rule, the depth of a part by stretching increases as the work hardening exponent (n) increases. As discussed in 2.C.1.c., an increase in n value can increase: 1) The allowable stretch as determined by the forming limit curve (FLC). 2) The ability of steel to distribute the strain distribution more uniformly in the presence of a stress gradient. DP steels have an increased n value at low values of strain compared to HSS (Figure 2-6). Therefore, DP steels have increased tendency to flatten strain gradients at their inception. Part designers can benefit from AHSS for all stamping areas that are formed in pure stretch, such as embossments, character lines, and other design features with localized strain gradients (Figure 2-24). Peak strain reduction in these gradients also means less localized thinning for in-service requirements.

Figure 2-24 - Stretch forming generated by a rounded or flat bottom punch.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-28

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

By 8% strain, the higher instantaneous n value of DP steels has been depleted (Figure 2-6) and the n values are similar to conventional HSS. Therefore, traditional formulas used to set the height of the FLC used for HSLA can be used for DP steels when compared at equal yield strengths (Figure 2-17). However, when comparisons are made between DP and HSLA steels with equal tensile strengths, the DP steels do have higher FLCs. Caution must be taken when those stretch operations (embossments and other design features) are performed on prior-deformed areas. Due to the rapid work hardening rate for AHSS, the residual formability from the prior operation may be quite different from that for conventional HSS. TRIP steels have high n values compared to HSS throughout their entire strain range (Figure 2-8). A continual high n means steel is much more suitable to suppress localization of strain generated by design features in the stamping. The higher terminal (high strain) n value also means a higher FLC (Figure 2-18), where, for example, the FLC for the TRIP 350/600 steel approximates that of a Mild steel. In stretch forming, the TRIP steel has an additional advantage compared to DP and conventional HSLA steels. As the strain begins to localize at the high stress locations in the stamping, the deformation causes additional transformation from retained austenite to martensite. This further strengthens the deformation zone and forces redistribution of deformation to areas of less strain. The total effect of the higher n value and additional transformation to martensite is documented by the Limiting Dome Height (LDH) test results shown in Figure 2-25.N-1 The actual properties of the two steels tested are: TRIP 399/614, uniform elongation = 26.3%, total elongation = 35.3% HSLA 413/564, uniform elongation = 16.9%, total elongation = 27.5% Blanks were coated with conventional anti-rust oil and held with a circular lock bead of 165 mm diameter. The minimum hemispherical dome height at failure is substantially higher for the TRIP steel compared to the equivalent HSLA steel.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-25 - Limiting Dome Height is greater for TRIP than HSLA for the two steel grades tested.T-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-29

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

The Limit Dome Height test results for EDDQ (vacuum-degassed Interstitial-free) steel and three AHSS are in Figure 2-26. Instead of plotting the various dome heights (as in Figure 2-25) to find the minimum value, Figure 2-26 simply shows the minimum value for each steel. Note that the TWIP 450/1000 has greater stretchability than the low strength IF steel (EDDQ).

Figure 2-26 – Liming Dome Height values reflect relative stretchability of three AHSS compared to a low strength IF steel.P-2 The same tooling, steels, and lubricant from Figure 2-25 generated the thinning strains in Figure 2-27. However, the 50 mm radius hemispherical punch stretched the dome height to only 25 mm for both steels. The increased capability of the TRIP steel to minimize localized thinning is observed.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-27 - The local thinning is smaller for TRIP than HSLA at a constant dome height.T-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-30

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

A series of hemispherical dome stretch forming tests showed the expected decrease in stretchability as the yield and tensile strength increased (Figure 2-28).

Figure 2-28 - Dome stretch tests using a 100 mm hemispherical punch and a clamped blank. Sheet thickness is 1.2 mm except for the MS thickness of 1.5 mm.C-1 The maximum length of line that can be stretched depends on tool design, lubrication, and many other inputs to the forming system. Computerized forming-process development is an important procedure for assessing the benefits of AHSS over conventional HSS for specific stamping designs.

2.C.3.b. Deep Drawing (Cup Drawing) Deep drawing is defined as radial drawing or cup drawing (Figure 2-29). The flange of a circular blank is subjected to a radial tension and a circumferential compression as the flange moves in a radial direction towards the circular die radius in response to a pull generated by a flat bottom punch. In addition to forming cylindrical cups, segments of a deep drawn cup are found in corners of box-shaped stampings and at the ends of closed channels.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-29 - A circular blank is formed into a cylindrical cup by the deep drawing, radial drawing, or cup drawing method of deformation.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-31

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

The steel property that improves cup drawing or radial drawing is the normal anisotropy or rm value. Values greater than one allow an increase in the limiting draw ratio (LDR), which is the maximum ratio of blank diameter to punch diameter allowed in the first draw. In contrast, the LDR is insensitive to the strength of the steel and the n value. High-strength steels with UTS greater than 450 MPa and hot-rolled steels have rm values approximating one and the LDR averages around 2. Therefore, DP steels have an LDR similar to HSS. However, the TRIP steels have a slightly improved LDR deep drawability.T-2 Since the martensite transformation is influenced by the deformation mode (Figure 2-30), the amount of transformed martensite generated by shrink flanging in the flange area is less than the plane strain deformation in the cup wall. This difference in transformation from retained austenite to martensite makes the wall area stronger than the flange area, thereby increasing the LDR.

Figure 2-30 - The cup wall is strengthened more than the flange due to increased amounts of transformed martensite in TRIP steels.T-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-32

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Excluding the special cup drawing features of the TRIP steels mentioned above, laboratory cup drawing experiments show an approximate LDR of 2 for the DP steels tested (Figure 2-31).

Figure 2-31 - LDR tests for Mild, DP, and MS steels.C-1 The absolute value of the LDR, however, also depends on the lubrication, blank holder load, die radius, and other system inputs.

2.C.3.c. Bending The usual mode of bending is curvature around a straight line radius (Figure 2-32). Across the radius is a gradient of strains from maximum outer fibre tension though a neutral axis to inner fibre compression. No strain (plane strain) occurs along the bend axis.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-32 - Typical three-point bend has outer fibre tension and inner fibre compression with a neutral axis in the centre.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-33

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Three-point Bending A higher total elongation helps sustain a larger outer fibre stretch of the bend before surface fracture, thereby permitting a smaller bend radius. Since total elongation decreases with increasing strength for a given sheet thickness, the achievable minimum design bend radius must be increased (Figure 2-33).

Figure 2-33 – Achievable minimum bend radius (r/t) in a three-point bend test increases as the total elongation of the steel decreases.S-5

For equal strengths, most AHSS have greater total elongations than HSS (Figures 2-2 and 2-3). The microstructure of DP and TRIP consists of a highly inhomogeneous combination of soft ferrite matrix and hard martensite islands. This microstructure creates a larger total elongation due to the increased work hardening. A smaller minimum design bend radius is expected. However, the deformation can localize around the hard phases and create low local elongations or edge stretch capability as measured by the hole expansion test (Figure 2-20). Several cases of early radii cracking of production bending DP and TRIP steels have been attributed to this lower local elongation.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-34

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.3.d. Roll Forming The roll forming process forms a flat metal strip by successive bending into the desired shape. Each bending operation can be distributed along several sets of rolls to minimize strain localization and compensate for springback. Therefore, roll forming is well suited for generating many complex shapes from AHSS, especially those with low total elongations such as MS. Roll forming can produce AHSS parts with:  Steels of all levels of mechanical properties and different microstructures.  Springback compensation without particularly complex tools.  Small radii depending on the thickness and mechanical properties of the steel.  Reduced number of forming stations compared with lower strength steel. However, the forces on the rollers and frames are higher. A rule of thumb says that the force is linear with the strength but square with the thickness. Therefore, structural strength ratings of the roll forming equipment must be checked in order to avoid bending of the shafts. Typical values of the minimum radius and springback can be determined for the different AHSS with tests on simple U shapes performed with six stations (Figure 2-34)

Figure 2-34 - Comparison between the minimum radii made by roll forming and bending a 2 mm MS 1050/1400 steel.S-5

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-35

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

The value of minimum internal radius of a roll formed component depends primarily on the thickness and the tensile strength of the steel (Figure 2-35). Roll forming allows smaller radii than a bending process.

Figure 2-35 – Achievable minimum r/t values for bending and roll forming for different strength and types of steel. S-5

The main parameters having an influence on the springback are the radius of the component, the thickness, and the yield strength of the steel. The effects of these parameters are shown in Figure 2-36. As expected, angular change increases for increased tensile strength and bend radius.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-36 – Angular change increases with increasing tensile strength and bend radii. A-4,

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-36

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Roll forming makes it possible to control the strains in the bend to minimise the springback (Figure 2-37).

MS 1150/1400 MS 950/1200 DP 700/1000 Figure 2-37- A profile made with the same tool setup for three steels having different strengths and the same thickness. Even with the large difference in strength, the springback is almost the same. S-5

2.C.3.e. Hot-Forming Today, many product designs tend to combine maximum complexity and part consolidation with the highest possible final strength steel required for in-service applications. Maximum part complexity usually requires superior stretchability as evidenced by high work hardening capability and defined by the n-value. Part consolidation might take three non-severe parts and make one very severe large part. Imagine three separate parts deep drawn with extensive metal flow from the binder to provide maximum part depth. Laying the three parts side-by-side in a straight line, now connect them with welds to make the final part. Now attempt to make all three attached parts from a single blank in one die. There is no binder area to feed the centre part, which now must form completely by excessive stretch forming. Making the problem worse, increasing the strength of the as-received steel reduces the stretch capacity of the steel because the work hardening exponent (n-value) decreases with increasing strength for each type of steel. Finally, springback problems increase as the yield strength increases. The hot-forming process can minimize all the above problems. The following steps present details of the hot-forming process.M-2, I-1 While several steels are applicable, the data below represent the most common boron-manganese AHSS. The initial microstructure is composed of ferrite and pearlite. Direct Hot-forming Process

Figure 2–38A – Schematic showing steps in the Direct Hot-Forming process. V-2 Step 1 – Cut the blank. The as-received HF steel is at room temperature with yield strength of 350-400 MPa, a tensile strength of 550-600 MPa, and a total elongation around 25% (See true stress-strain curves in Figure 2-10). Blanking dies must withstand these properties.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Step 2- Heat the blank: The target temperature is above 900 ºC needed to change the microstructure to austenite. Typical furnace time is 5-8 minutes. Because of the high temperature heating, uncoated steel would generate a surface oxide. Currently, an aluminium-silicon coating prevents the formation of this surface oxide. The coating also helps prevent in-service corrosion in part areas difficult to shot blast or otherwise remove the surface oxide prior to application of additional corrosion protection treatments.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-37

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Step 3 – Transfer blank to die: Robots can transfer the blank to the water-cooled die in about three seconds. Step 4 – Forming the part: Forming temperate typically starts at 850 ºC and ends at 650 ºC. While in the austenitic range, the true yield stress is relatively constant at 40 MPa with high elongations greater than 50%. This permits parts with maximum complexity and part consolidation to form successfully. Step 5 – In-die quenching: When forming is completed, the part now contacts both the punch and die for both side quenching. The minimum quench rate is 50 ºC/sec. Some actual cooling rates are two or three times the minimum rate. The quench process transforms the austenite to martensite throughout the entire part. The room temperature properties of the part are 1000-1250 MPa yield strength, 1400 -1700 tensile strength, and 4-8% elongations (See the true stress-strain curve in Figure 2-10). Total time for robot transfer, forming, and quenching is about 20-30 seconds. With smaller parts, forming and quenching of multiple parts in the die reduces per part processing time. Step 6 – Post-forming operations: The very high strength and low elongations of the final part restrict these final operations. The room temperature part should not undergo additional forming. Any special cutting, trimming, and piercing equipment must withstand the high loads generated during these operations. Indirect Hot-forming Process

Figure 2-38B – Schematic showing steps in the In-Direct Hot-Forming process.

V-2

The indirect hot-forming process adds a preform step between Step 1 - Cut the blank and Step 2 – Heat the blank in the direct hot-forming process described above. Here, preforming most of the part geometry at room temperature occurs without generating failures based on incoming steel properties. This room temperature forming in a traditional die aims for 90-95% of the final part shape. The part is trimmed and then subjected to the usual heating cycle in Step 2 above. Additional hot-forming is now possible for areas of the part too severe to form at room temperature. However, the in-direct forming process has a cost increase over the direct hot-forming process – two dies are required instead of one. Benefits 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

Part has low directionality of properties measured by r-value anisotropy. Springback issues eliminated, which is remarkable considering the extremely high final part strength. Manufactured parts have low distortion. Part consolidation has high feasibility for success. Both high yield strength and steep cyclic stress-strain response create excellent fatigue performance. Very high strength resists part deformation. A 10% increase in yield strength (about 100 MPa) bake hardening effect can further increase in-service strength. 8. Hot-forming has the highest potential for weight reduction of crash components.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-38

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.3.f. Key Points Stretching  DP steel has a higher initial n value than TRIP steel, which helps flatten emerging strain gradients and localized thinning. Stretch form features such as embossments can be slightly sharper or deeper. DP steel does not have a higher FLC compared to HSS with comparable YS.  TRIP steels benefit from a higher n throughout the deformation process, which helps to flatten emerging strain gradients and reduce localized thinning. In addition, the height of the FLC is increased and higher values of strain are allowed before failure.  The limited stretchability of both HSS and AHSS (compared to Mild steels) increases the importance of product design, change of forming mode, utilization of a preform stage, lubricant selection, and other process design options. Deep Drawing (Cup Drawing)  The LDR for both HSS and DP steels is approximately two because the rm values for most HSS and AHSS are approximately one.  The LDR for TRIP steel is slightly greater than two because transformation strengthening in the cup wall is greater than equivalent strengthening in the deforming flange. Bending  Since total elongation decreases with increasing strength for a given sheet thickness, the minimum design bend radius must be increased.  For equal strengths, most AHSS have greater total elongations than HSS.  Roll forming can produce AHSS parts with steels of all levels of mechanical properties and different microstructures.  Roll forming creates springback compensation primarily though overbending without particularly complex tools. Hot forming  For Direct hot-forming, the sheet steel is heated to approximately 900 ºC.  The yield stress during deformation is about 40 MPa.  The part is quenched to achieve a martensitic microstructure with a very high yield and tensile strength.  The formed and quenched part has no springback issues.  For In-Direct hot forming, most of the part shape is formed at room temperature prior to the heating and quenching cycle.

2.C.4. Tool Design The primary concerns for tool design for forming AHSS are: 1) Increased forces required to form the sheet metal. 2) Need for additional tool features for increased springback compensation.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-39

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.4.a. Tool Materials In general, the existing tool and die shop procedures to select the appropriate die material can be used to select dies made to stamp AHSS grades. However, the considerably higher strength level of these grades exerts proportionally increased load on the die material. AHSS might reach hardness values 4-5 times higher than Mild steel grades. This is partially due to the microstructure of the sheet metal itself since some grades include martensitic phases for the required strength. For the martensitic grades (MS), the basic structure is martensite with tensile strengths approaching 1700 MPa. The higher forces required to form AHSS require increased attention to tool specifications. The three primary areas are:  Stiffness and toughness of the tool substrate for failure protection.  Harder tool surface finishes for wear protection.  Surface roughness of the tool. Lifetime and performance of a particular drawing die is primarily determined by the accepted amount of wear/galling between maintenance periods. When selecting die material, some of the key elements that affect the specification of the die material are:  Sheet metal: strength, thickness, surface coating.  Die construction, machineability, radii sharpness, surface finish.  Lubrication.  Cost per part. AHSS characteristics must be determined when designing tools. First is the initial, as-received yield strength, which is the minimum yield strength throughout the entire sheet. Second is the increase in strength level, which can be substantial for stampings that undergo high strain levels. These two factors acting in tandem can greatly increase the local load. This local load increase mostly accelerates the wear of draw radii with a less pronounced effect on other surfaces. Counteracting this load increase can be a reduction in sheet thickness. Thickness reduction for weight saving is one primary reason for applications of AHSS. Unfortunately, the reduced thickness of the steel increases the tendency to wrinkle. Higher blankholder loads are required to suppress these wrinkles. Any formation of wrinkles will increase the local load and accelerate the wear effects. Tool steel inserts for forming dies must be selected according to the work material and the severity of the forming. Surface coatings are recommended for DP 350/600 and higher grades. When coatings are used, it is important that the substrate has sufficient hardness/strength to avoid plastic deformation of the tool surface - even locally. Therefore, a separate surface hardening, such as nitriding, can be used before the coating is applied. Before coating, it is important to use the tool as a pre-production tool to allow the tool to set, and to provide time for tool to adjust. Surface roughness must be as low as possible before coating. Ra values below 0.2 mm are recommended. Steel inserts of 1.2379 or 1.2382 with a TiC/TiN coating are recommended for local high-pressure die areas wearing the zinc off galvanized blanks. Tool steels for cutting, trimming, and punching tools must be selected in a similar way. Tool hardness between 58 and 62 HRC is recommended. Coatings may be used to reduce tool wear, but for the highest strength steels (above 1000 MPa tensile strength) use of coatings only generates limited further improvements. At this level of steel strength, coating failures occur due to local deformation of the die material substrate. Heattreated (hardened) cutter knives of 1.2379 or 1.2383 show minor wear of the cutter edge. The radial shear gap should be around 10% of the blank thickness.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-40

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

High performance tool steels, such as powder metallurgy (PM) grades, are almost always economical, despite their higher price, because of their low wear rate. Figure 2-39 shows the relative tool wear when punching Mild steel with conventional tool steel (A) and punching of DP 350/600 with an uncoated (B) and coated (C) PM tool steel.

A = Mild steel formed with 1.2363 tool steel dies (X100CrMoV5/1; US A2; Japan SKD 12) B = DP 350/600 steel formed with 1.3344 tool steel dies (carbon 1.20%, vanadium 3%) C = DP 350/600 steel formed with 1.3344 tool steel dies + hard surface CVD

Figure 2-39 - Tool wear results for different tool steels and surface treatments using Mild steel with A2 dies (A) for a reference of 1.H-2 Tests B and C show tool wear for DP 350/600 formed in uncoated (B) and coated (C) PM dies. Research on different surface treatments for a hat-profile drawing with draw beads showed a similar effect of coated surfaces on a cast iron die and a tool steel die (Figure 2-40).

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

GGG70L = Spheroid graphite bearing cast iron, flame hardened 1.2379 = Tool steel (X155CrMo12/1; US D2; Japan SKD 11)

Figure 2-40 - Surface treatment effects on tool wear, DP steel EG, 1mm.T-3

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-41

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Ceramic tool inserts have extreme hardness for wear resistance, high heat resistance, and optimum tribological behaviour, but have poor machineability and severe brittleness. High costs are offset by reduced maintenance and increased productivity. While not commonly used, the ceramic tool inserts offer a possible solution to high interface loading and wear. Additional information on tool wear is contained in Section 2.C.6.b. Tool Wear, Clearances, and Burr Height.

2.C.4.b. Tool Design Issues Goals for springback compensation:  Design out springback in the first draw stage to eliminate additional costly corrective operations.  Consider strain path and reduce the number of bend/unbend scenarios.  Adequate strain levels in the panel must be achieved to avoid greater springback and sidewall curl.  Higher press forces are experienced on the structure of the tool. Concerns for trim and pierce tool design:  Engineer trim tools to withstand higher loads since AHSS have higher tensile strength than conventional high-strength steels.  Proper support for the trim stock during trim operation is very important to minimize edge cracking.  Modify trim schedule to minimize elastic recovery.  Shedding of scrap can be a problem because springback of DP steel can cause scrap to stick very firmly in the tool. Flange design:  Design more formable flanges to reduce need for extra re-strike operations.  Areas to be flanged should have a “break-line” or initial bend radius drawn in the first die to reduce springback.  Adapt die radii for material strength and blank thickness. Draw beads:  Draw beads can generate large amount work hardening and increased press loads.  Utilize draw beads to induce strain and therefore reduce elastic recovery.  Optimize the use of shape and size of blanks to reduce the reliance on draw beads, which can excessively work harden the material before entering the die opening. Guidelines to avoid edge cracking during stretch flanging:  Abrupt changes in flange length cause local stress raisers leading to edge cracks. Hence, the transition of flange length should be gradual.  Use metal gainers in the draw die or in the die prior to stretch flange operation to compensate for change in length of line that occurs. This can avoid edge cracking of a stretch flange.  Avoid the use of sharp notch features in curved flanges.  Edge preparation (quality of cut) is a critical factor. Correcting loose metal:  The higher strength of AHSS makes it more difficult to pull out loose metal or achieve a minimum stretch in flat sections of stampings.  Increase the use of addendum, metal gainers (Figure 2-41), and other tool features to balance lengths of line or to locally increase stretch.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-42

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-41 - Insertion of metal gainers to avoid insufficient stretched areas and eliminate buckles.T-3

2.C.4.c. Prototype Tools For prototyping tools, normally soft tool materials are used and tool surfaces are not protected by wear resistant coatings during tool try out. When laser cut blanks of AHSS are used during try out, the blank holder surface may be damaged due to the high hardness in the laser cut edges. Measures to be taken:  Close control of laser cutting parameters in order to reduce burr and hardness.  Deburr the laser cut blanks. Soft tools may be used for manufacturing prototype parts and the inserts used to eliminate local wrinkles or buckles. However, soft tools should not be used to assess manufacturability and springback of AHSS parts.

2.C.4.d. Key Points  Areas of concern are the higher working loads that require better tool materials and coatings for both failure protection and wear protection.

 The higher initial yield strengths of AHSS, plus the increased work hardening of DP and TRIP steels    

can increase the working loads of these steels by a factor 3 or 4 compared to Mild steels. AHSS hardness values might increase by a factor 4 or 5 over those of Mild steel. Powder metallurgy (PM) tools may be recommended for some AHSS applications. Parameters for normal tool design will have to be modified to incorporate more aggressive springback compensation techniques. Design process to minimize wrinkling. Wrinkling leads to higher loads and more tool wear.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-43

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.5. Springback Decades ago, the major concern in sheet metal forming was elimination of necks and tears. These forming problems were a function of plastic strain and generally were addressed by maintaining strain levels in the part below specific critical strains. These critical strains were dictated by various forming limits, which included forming limit diagrams, sheared edge stretch tests, and in-service structural requirements. Today the primary emphasis has shifted to accuracy and consistency of product dimensions. These dimensional problems are a function of the elastic stresses created during the forming of the part and the relief of these stresses, or lack thereof, during the unloading of part after each forming operation. These dimensional problems or springback are created in all parts. However, their magnitude generally increases as the strength of the steel increases. Many companies have attacked springback problems with proprietary in-house compensation procedures developed over years of trial and error production of various parts. An example would be specific over-crowning of a hood panel or over-bending a channel to allow the parts to springback to part print dimensions. The introduction of AHSS creates additional challenges. First, many of the panels generate higher flow stresses, which are the combination of yield strength and work hardening during deformation. This creates higher elastic stresses in the part. Second, applying AHSS for weight reduction also requires the application of thinner sheet metal that is less capable of maintaining part shape. Third, very little or no prior experience has been generated in most companies relative to springback compensation procedures for AHSS. Many reports state that springback problems are much greater for AHSS than for traditional HSS such as HSLA steels. However, a better description would be that the springback of AHSS is different from springback of HSLA steels. Knowledge of different mechanical properties is required. Certainly better communication between the steel supplier and the steel user is mandatory. An example of this difference is shown in Figure 2-42. The two channels were made sequentially in a draw die with a pad on the post. The draw die was developed to attain part print dimensions with the HSLA 350/ 450 steel. The strain distributions between the two parts were very close with almost identical lengths of line. However, the stress distributions were very different because of the steel property differences between DP and HSLA steels (Figure 2-6).

Figure 2-42 - Two channels made sequentially in the same die.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-44

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.5.a. Origins of Springback When sheet metal is plastically deformed into a part, the shape of the part always deviates somewhat from the shape of punch and die after removal from the tooling. This dimensional deviation of the part is known as springback. Springback is caused by elastic recovery of the part, which can be illustrated simply on the stress-strain curves shown in Figure 2-43.

Figure 2-43 - Schematic showing amount of springback is proportional to stress. Unloading (by removing all external forces and moments) from the plastic deformation level A would follow line AB to B, where OB is the permanent deformation (plastic) and BC is the recovered deformation (elastic). Although this elastic recovered deformation at a given location is very small, it can cause significant shape change due to its mechanical multiplying effect on other locations when bending deformation and/or curved surfaces are involved. The magnitude of springback is governed by the tooling and component geometry. When part geometry prevents complete unloading (relaxing) of the elastic stresses, the elastic stresses remaining in the part are called residual stresses. The part then will assume whatever shape it can to minimize the total remaining residual stresses. If all elastic stresses cannot be relieved, then creating a uniformly distributed residual stress pattern across the sheet and through the thickness will help eliminate the source of mechanical multiplier effects and thus lead to reduced springback problems. In general, springback experienced in AHSS parts is greater than that experienced in mild or HSLA steels. The expected springback is a function of the as-formed flow stress. Since AHSS have higher as-formed flow stresses for equal part-forming strains, springback generally will be higher for AHSS.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-45

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.5.b. Types of Springback Three modes of springback commonly found in channels and underbody components are angular change, sidewall curl, and twist. Angular Change Angular change, sometimes called springback, is the angle created when the bending edge line (the part) deviates from the line of the tool. The springback angle is measured off the punch radius (Figure 2-44). If there is no sidewall curl, the angle is constant up the wall of the channel.

Figure 2-44 - Schematic showing difference between angular change and sidewall curl. Angular/cross-section change is caused by stress difference in the sheet thickness direction when a sheet metal bends over a die radius. This stress difference in the sheet thickness direction creates a bending moment at the bending radius after dies are released, which results in the angular change. The key to eliminating or minimizing the angular change is to eliminate or to minimize this bending moment.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-46

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Sidewall Curl Sidewall curl is the curvature created in the side wall of a channel (Figures 2-42 and 2-44). This curvature occurs when a sheet of metal is drawn over a die/punch radius or through a draw bead. The primary cause is uneven stress distribution or stress gradient through the thickness of the sheet metal. This stress is generated during the bending and unbending process. During the bending and unbending sequence, the deformation histories for both sides of the sheet are unlikely to be identical. This usually manifests itself by flaring the flanges, which is an important area for joining to other parts. The resulting sidewall curl can cause assembly difficulties for rail or channel sections that require tight tolerance of mating faces during assembly. In the worst case, a gap resulting from the sidewall curl can be so large that welding is not possible.

Figure 2-45 - Origin and mechanism of sidewall curl. Figure 2-45 illustrates in detail what happens when sheet metal is drawn over the die radius (a bending and unbending process). The deformation in side A changes from tension (A1) during bending to compression (A2) during unbending. In contrast, the deformation in side B changes from compression (B1) to tension (B2) during bending and unbending. As the sheet enters the sidewall, side A is in compression and side B is in tension, although both sides may have similar amounts of strain. Once the punch is removed from the die cavity (unloading), side A tends to elongate and side B to contract due to the elastic recovery causing a curl in the sidewall. This difference in elastic recovery in side A and side B is the main source of variation in sidewall curl along the wall. The higher the strength of the deformed metal, the greater the magnitude and difference in elastic recovery between sides A and B and the increase in sidewall curl. The strength of the deformed metal depends not only on the as-received yield strength, but also on the work hardening capacity. This is one of the key differences between conventional HSS and AHSS. Clearly, the rule for minimizing the sidewall curl is to minimize the stress gradient through the sheet thickness.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-47

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HSS AND AHSS - The difference in strain hardening between conventional HSS and AHSS explains how the relationship between angular change and sidewall curl can alter part behaviour. Figure 2-46 shows the crossover of the true stress – true strain curves when the two steels are specified by equal tensile strengths. The AHSS have lower yield strengths than traditional HSS for equal tensile strengths. At the lower strain levels usually encountered in angular change at the punch radius, AHSS have a lower level of stress and therefore less springback.

Figure 2-46 - Schematic description of the effect of hardening properties on springback.K-4

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-48

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

This difference for steels of equal tensile strength (but different yield strengths) is shown in Figure 2-47. Of course, the predominant trend is increasing angular change for increasing steel strength.

Figure 2-47 - The AHSS have less angular change at the punch radius for equal tensile strength steels.K-4

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-48 - The AHSS have greater sidewall curl for equal tensile strength steels.N-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-49

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Sidewall curl is a higher strain event because of the bending and unbending of the steel going over the die radius and any draw beads. For the two stress–strain curves shown in Figure 2-46, the AHSS now are at a higher stress level with increased elastic stresses. Therefore, the sidewall curl is greater for the AHSS (Figure 2-48). Now assume that the comparison is made between a conventional HSS and an AHSS specified with the same yield stress. Figure 2-46 would then show the stress–strain curve for the AHSS is always greater (and sometimes substantially greater) than the curve for HSS. Now the AHSS channel will have greater springback for both angular change and sidewall curl compared to the HSS channel. This result would be similar to the channels shown in Figure 2-42. These phenomena are dependant on many factors, such as part geometry, tooling design, process parameter, and material properties, and in some cases, they may not even appear. However, the high work-hardening rate of the DP and TRIP steels causes higher increases in the strength of the deformed steel for the same amount of strain. Therefore, any differences in tool build, die and press deflection, location of pressure pins, and other inputs to the part can cause varying amounts of springback - even for completely symmetrical parts. Twist Twist is defined as two cross-sections rotating differently along their axis. Twist is caused by torsion moments in the cross-section of the part. The torsional displacement (twist) develops because of unbalanced springback and residual stresses acting in the part to create a force couple, which tends to rotate one end of the part relative to another. As shown in Figure 2-49 the torsional moment can come from the in-plane residual stresses in the flange, the sidewall, or both.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-49 - Torsion Moment created flange or sidewall residual stresses.Y-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-50

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

The actual magnitude of twist in a part will be determined by the relationship between unbalanced stresses on the part and the stiffness of the part in the direction of the twist. Low torsional stiffness values in long, thin parts are the reason high aspect ratio parts have significantly higher tendencies to twist. There is also a lever effect, whereby the same amount of twist will result in a larger displacement in a long part than would be the case in a shorter part with a similar twist angle. The tendency for parts to twist can be overcome by reducing the imbalance in the residual stresses forming the force couple that creates the torsional movement. Unbalanced forces are more likely in unsymmetrical parts, parts with wide flanges or high sidewalls, and in parts with sudden changes in cross section. Parts with unequal flange lengths or non-symmetric cutouts will be susceptible to twist due to unbalanced springback forces generated by these non-symmetrical features. Even in geometrically symmetrical parts, unbalanced forces can be generated if the strain gradients in the parts are non-symmetrical. Some common causes of non-symmetrical strains in symmetrical parts are improper blank placement, uneven lubrication, uneven die polishing, uneven blankholder pressure, misaligned presses, or broken/worn draw beads. These problems will result in uneven material draw-in with higher strains and higher elastic recoveries on one side of the part compared to the other, thereby generating a force couple and inducing twist. Twist can also be controlled by maximizing the torsional stiffness of the part - by adding ribs or other geometrical stiffeners or by redesigning or combining parts to avoid long, thin sections that will have limited torsional stiffness. Global Shape Change Global shape changes, such as reduced curvature when unloading the panel in the die, are usually corrected by springback compensation measures. The key problem is minimizing springback variation during the run of the part and during die transition. One study showed that the greatest global shape (dimensional) changes were created during die transition.A-1 Surface Disturbances Surface disturbances develop from reaction to local residual stress patterns within the body of the part. Common examples are high and low spots, oil canning, and other local deformations that form to balance total residual stresses to their lowest value.

2.C.5.c. Springback Correction Forming of a part creates elastic stresses unless the forming is performed at a higher temperature range where stress relief is accomplished before the part leaves the die. An example of the latter condition is HF steels. Therefore, some form of springback correction is required for bring the part back to part print. This springback correction can take many forms. The first approach is to apply an additional process that changes undesirable elastic stresses to less damaging elastic stresses. One example is a post-stretch operation that reduces sidewall curl by changing the tensileto-compressive elastic stress gradient through the thickness of the sidewall to all tensile elastic stresses though the thickness. Another example is over-forming panels and channels so that the release of elastic stresses brings the part dimensions back to part print instead of becoming undersized.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

A second approach is to modify the process and/or tooling to reduce the level of elastic stresses actually imparted to the part during the forming operation. An example would be to reduce sidewall curl by replacing sheet metal flowing through draw beads and over a die radius with a simple 90 degree bending operation.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-51

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

A third approach for correcting springback problems is to modify product design to resist the release of the elastic stresses. Mechanical stiffeners are added to the part design to lock in the elastic stresses to maintain desired part shape. All three approaches are discussed in detail in this unit. While most are applicable to all higher strength steels, the very high flow stresses encountered with AHSS make springback correction high on the priority list. In addition, most of the corrective actions presented here apply to angular change and sidewall curl. Change the Elastic Stresses POST–STRETCH: One of the leading techniques for significant reduction of both angular change and sidewall curl is a Post-Stretch operation. An in-plane tension is applied after the bending operations in draw beads and die radii to change tensile to compressive elastic stress gradients to all tensile elastic stresses. When the part is still in the die, the outer surface of the bend over the punch radius is in tension (Point A in Figure 2-50), while the inner surface is in compression (B). Upon release from the deforming force, the tensile elastic stresses (A) tend to shrink the outer layers and the compressive elastic forces (B) tend to elongate the inner layers. These opposite forces form a mechanical advantage to magnify the angular change. The differential stress can be considered the driver for the dimensional change. In the case of side wall curl this differential stress increases as the sheet metal is work hardened going through draw beads and around the die radius into the wall of the part.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-50 – Sheet metal bent over a punch radius has elastic stresses of the opposite sign creating a mechanical advantage to magnify angular change. Similar effects create sidewall curl for sheet metal pulled through draw beads and over die radii.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-52

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

To correct this angular change and sidewall curl, a tensile stress is applied to the flange end of the wall until an approximate minimum tensile strain of 2% is generated within the sidewall of the stamping. The sequence is shown in Figure 2-51. The initial elastic states are tensile (A1) and compressive (B1). When approximately 2% tensile strain is added to A1, the strain point work hardens and moves up slightly to A2. However, when 2% tensile strain is added to B1, the compressive elastic stress state first decreases to zero, then climbs to a positive level and work hardens slightly to point B2. The neutral axis is moved out of the sheet metal. The now approaches zero. Instead of bending or curving outward, the wall simply shortens differential stress by a small amount similar to releasing the load on a tensile test sample. This shortening of the wall length can be easily corrected by an increased punch stroke.

Figure 2-51 – When subjected to a 2% tensile strain, the positive to compressive stress differential shown in Figure 2-45 is now reduced to a very small amount. The common method used to create the 2% post-stretch is form the part with a pullover plug. The bottom blank holder contains retracted movable beads and the upper blankholder contains the bead pockets. An adjustable stop block is located directly under the movable beads. At the correct amount of punch stroke, the movable beads hit the stop blocks, move up, and are forced into the sheet metal flange. This creates a blank locking action while the punch continues to deform the part. In other applications, the part is removed from the first die and inserted into a second die that locks the remaining flange. The part is then further deformed by 2%.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

These post-stretch forming operations normally require significantly higher forming forces to be effective since the sidewalls have been strengthened by work hardening resulting from the forming operation. This is especially true for AHSS. Therefore, the movable draw beads may have to be replaced by movable lock beads. Even if the press is capable of generating the higher forces, caution must be taken not to neck down and tear the sheet metal bent over the punch radius.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-53

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

A restrike operation may be required after trimming to ensure dimensional precision. The restrike die should sharpen the radius and provide sidewall stretch (post-stretch) of approximately 2%. A case study on post-stretch was conducted on TRIP 450/800, DP 850/980, DP 450/750, DP 350/600, CM 490/590, and HSLA 350/450 steels using two specially designed diesL-1. One die had conventional metal flowing from the flange without a bead. The second die had a recessed square lock bead in the flange that created a post-stretch near the end of the stroke. As expected, the side wall curl was very small with the post-stretch die. In addition, the material tensile strength did not have much effect on the amount of springback in the post-stretch die. This translates into a more robust process. OVER-FORMING: Many angular change problems occur when the tooling either is constructed to part print or has insufficient springback compensation. Over-forming or over-bending is required.

 Rotary bending tooling should be used where possible instead of flange wipe dies. The bending angle can be easily adjusted to correct for changes in springback due to variations in steel properties, die set, lubrication, and other process parameters. In addition, the tensile loading generated by the wiping shoe is absent.

 Multiple stage forming processes may be desirable or even required depending on the part shape. Utilize secondary operations to return a sprung shape back to part datum. Care must be taken though to ensure that any subsequent operation does not exceed the work hardening limit of the worked material. Use multi-stage computerized forming-process development to confirm strain and work hardening levels. Try to fold the sheet metal over a radius instead drawing or stretching.

 Cross-section design for longitudinal rails, pillars, and cross members can permit greater springback compensation. The rear longitudinal rail cross-section in sketch A of Figure 2-52 does not allow over-bend for springback compensation in the forming die. In addition, the forming will produce severe sidewall curl in AHSS channel-shaped cross sections. These quality issues can be minimized by designing a cross section similar to sketch B that allows for over-bend during forming. Sidewall curl is also diminished with the cross-sectional design. Typical wall opening angles should be 3degrees for Mild steel, 6 degrees for DP 350/600 and 10 degrees for DP 850/1000 or TRIP 450/800. In addition, the cross section in sketch B will have the effect of reducing the impact shock load when the draw punch contacts the AHSS sheet. The vertical draw walls shown in sketch A require higher binder pressures and higher punch forces to maintain process control.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-52 - Changing rail cross section from A to B allows easier over-bending to reduce springback problems with AHSS.N-3

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-54

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009



If over-bend must be incorporated for some parts to minimize angular change, use tool/die radii less than the part radius and use back relief for the die/punch (Figure 2-53).

Figure 2-53 – Over-bending is assisted when back relief is provided on the flange steel and lower die.A-2 

If necessary, add one or two extra forming steps. For example, use pre-crown in the bottom of channeltype parts in the first step and flatten the crown in the second step to eliminate the springback at sidewall (Figure 2-54).

.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-54 - Schematic showing how bottom pre-crown can be flattened to correct for angular springback.A-3

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-55

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Reduce or Minimize the Elastic Stresses Many times the design of the process, and therefore the tooling design, can drastically affect the level of the elastic stresses in the part. FORMING THE CHANNEL WALL: Figure 2-55 shows four possible forming processes to create a hatprofile channel with different blankholder actions.

Figure 2-55 – Four processes for generating a channel for bumper reinforcement create different levels of elastic stress and springback.K-5 Descriptions of the four processes above:

 Draw is the conventional forming type with continuous blankholder force and all blank material undergoing maximum bending and unbending over the die radius. This forming mode creates maximum sidewall curl.

 Form-draw is a forming process in which the blank holder force is applied between the middle and last stage of forming. It is most effective to reduce the sidewall curl because bend-unbend deformation is minimized and during the last stage of forming a large tensile stress (post-stretch) can be created.

 Form process allows the flange to be formed in the last stage of forming and the material undergoes only a slight amount of bend-unbend deformation.

 Bend is a simple bending process to reduce the sidewall curl because the sidewall does not undergo one or more sequences of bend and unbend. However, an angular change must be expected.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-56

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

GUIDELINES FOR DRAW AND STRETCH FORM DIES

 Equalize depth of draw as much as possible.  Binder pressure must be increased for AHSS. For example, DP 350/600 requires a tonnage factor 2.5 times greater than that required for AKDQ of comparable thickness. Higher binder pressure will reduce panel springback.

 Maintain a 1.1t maximum metal clearance in the draw dies.  Lubrication, upgraded die materials, and stamping process modification must be considered when drawing AHSS.

 Maintain die clearance as tight as allowed by formability and press capability to reduce unwanted bending and unbending (Figure 2-56).

Figure 2-56 - Reducing die clearance restricts additional bending and unbending as the sheet metal comes off the die radius to minimize angular change.Y-2



Stretch-forming produces a stiffer panel with less springback than drawing. Potential depth of the panel is diminished for both processes as the strength of the material increases. Deeper AHSS stampings will require the draw process.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-57

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

An extensive American Iron and Steel Institute studyS-3 defined a number of tool parameters that reduced angular change (Figure 2-57A) and side wall curl (Figure 2-57B).

Figure 2-57A – The effect of tool parameters in angular change. The lower values are better.S-3

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-57B - The effect of tool parameters in sidewall curl. Higher values of radius of curl are better.S-3

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-58

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

GUIDELINES FOR FORM DIE:

 Set-up the die to allow for appropriate over-bend on sidewalls.  Equalize the depth of forming as much as possible.  Use a post-stretch for channel-shaped stampings. For less complex parts, one form die should be sufficient. For more geometrically complex parts, the first die will form the part with open sidewalls. The second die will finish the form in a restrike die with post-stretch of the sidewalls. Part geometry will determine the required forming process.

 Some complex parts will require a form die with upper and lower pressure pads. To avoid upstroke deformation of the part, a delayed return pressure system must be provided for the lower pad. When a forming die with upper pad is used, sidewall curl is more severe in the vertical flange than in the angular flange.

 Provide higher holding pressure. DP 350/600 requires a force double that needed for Mild steel.  When using form dies, keep a die clearance at approximately 1.3t to minimize sidewall curl. Die clearance at 1t is not desirable since the sidewall curl reaches the maximum at this clearance.

 Do not leave open spaces in the die flange steels at the corners of the flanges. Fit the radius on both sides of metal at the flange break. Spank the flange radius at the bottom of the press stroke.

 Bottom the pad and all forming steels at the bottom of the press stroke. PART DESIGN: Part design features should be considered as early as possible in the concept stage to allow for proper process and tooling design decisions to be made.

 Successful application of any material requires close coordination of part design and the manufacturing process. Consult manufacturing process engineers when designing AHSS parts to understand the limitations/advantages of the material and the proper forming process to be employed.

 Design structural frames (such as rails and crossbars) as open-end channels to permit forming operations rather than draw die processes. AHSS stampings requiring draw operations (closed ends) are limited to a reduced depth of draw. Half the draw depth permitted for AKDQ is the rule of thumb for AHSS such as DP 350/600. Less complex, open-ended stamped channels are less limited in depth.

 Design AHSS channel shaped part depth as consistent as possible to avoid forming distortions. All shape transitions should be gradual to avoid distortions, especially in areas of metal compression. Minimize stretch/compression flanges whenever possible.

 Design the punch radius as sharp as formability and product/style allow. Small bend radii (<2t) will decrease the springback angle and variation (Figure 2-58). However, stretch bending will be more difficult as yield strength increases. In addition, sharp radii contribute to excessive thinning.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-59

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-58- Angular changes are increased by YS and bend radius to sheet thickness ratio.S-2

 Curved parts with unequal length sidewalls in the fore-aft direction will develop torsional twist after forming. The shorter length wall can be under tension from residual forming stresses. Torsional twist is more pronounced with the higher strength steels. Conventional guidelines for normal steels can also be applied to AHSS to avoid asymmetry that accentuates the possibility for part twist. However, the greater springback exhibited by AHSS means extra caution should taken to ensure symmetry is maintained as much as possible.

 Inner and outer motor-compartment rails also require an optimized cross-section design for AHSS applications. Sketch A in Figure 2-59 shows a typical rectangular box section through the inner and outer rails. This design will cause many problems for production due to sidewall curl and angular change. The hexagonal section in sketch B will reduce sidewall curl and twist problems, while permitting over-bend for springback compensation in the stamping dies.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-59 - Changing rail cross section from A to B reduces springback problems with AHSS.N-3

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-60

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

 Springback computer simulations should be used whenever possible to predict the trend of springback and to test the effectiveness of solutions.

 Design the part and tool in such a way that springback is desensitized to variations in material, gauge, tools and forming processes (a robust system and process) and that the effects of springback are minimized rather than attempt to compensate for it. Lock In the Elastic Stresses

 Where part design allows, mechanical stiffeners can be inserted to prevent the release of the elastic stresses and reduce various forms of springback (Figure 2-60). However, all elastic stresses not released remain in the part as residual or trapped stresses. Subsequent forming, trimming, punching, heating, or other processes may unbalance the residual stress and change the part shape. Twist also can be relieved by adding strategically placed beads, darts, or other geometric stiffeners in the shorter length wall to equalize the length of line.

Figure 2-60 – Mechanical stiffeners can be used to lock in the elastic stresses and the part shape.A-2

2.C.5.d. Key Points  Angular change and sidewall curl escalate with increasing as-formed yield strength and decrease    

with increasing material thickness. For equal yield strengths, DP steels exhibit more angular change and sidewall curl than conventional HSLA steels. The springback behaviours of TRIP steels are between DP and HSLA steels. The sidewall curl appears to be more sensitive to the material and set-up in a channel draw test. The angular change decreased with smaller tooling radii and tool gap, but sidewall curl showed mixed results for smaller tooling radii and tool gap. Both angular change and sidewall curl were reduced with a larger drawbead restraining force. Numerous process modifications are available to remove (or at least minimize and stabilize) the different modes of springback found in channels and similar configurations.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-61

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.6. Blanking, Shearing, and Trim Operations 2.C.6.a. General Comments AHSS exhibit high work hardening rates, resulting in improved forming capabilities compared to conventional HSS. However, the same high work hardening creates higher strength and hardness in sheared or punched edges. In addition, laser cutting samples will also lead to highly localized strength and hardness increases in the cut edge. In general, AHSS can be more sensitive to edge condition because of this higher strength. Therefore, it is important to obtain a good quality edge during the cutting operation. With a good edge, both sheared and laser cut processes can be used to provide adequate formability. To avoid unexpected problems during a program launch, production intent tooling should be used as early in the development as possible. For example, switching to a sheared edge from a laser-cut edge may lead to problems if the lower ductility, usually associated with a sheared edge, is not accounted for during development.

2.C.6.b. Tool Wear, Clearances, and Burr Height Cutting and punching clearances should be increased with increasing sheet material strength. The clearance range from about 6% of the sheet material thickness for Mild steel up to about 10 or 14% for the highest grade with a tensile strength of about 1400 MPa. Two hole punching studies.C-2 were conducted with Mild steel and AHSS. The first measured tool wear, while the second studied burr height formation. The studies showed that wear when punching AHSS with surface treated high quality (PM) tool steels is comparable with punching Mild steel with conventional tools. If burr height is the criterion, high quality tool steels may be used with longer intervals between resharpening when punching AHSS, since the burr height does not increase as quickly with tool wear as when punching Mild steel with conventional tool steels. Tested were 1.0 mm sheet metals: Mild 140/270, A80 = 38%, DP 350/600, A80 = 20%, DP 500/800, A80=8%, and MS1150/1400, A80 = 3%. Tool steels were W.Nr. 1.2363 / AISI A2 with a hardness of 61 HRC and a 6% clearance for Mild steel tests. PM tools with a hardness range of 60-62 HRC were used for the AHSS tests. For the DP 350/600, the punch was coated with CVD (TiC) and the clearance was 6%. Tool clearances were 10 % for the MS 1150/1400 and 14 % for DP 500/800.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-62

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Punching test results: The worn cross-section of the punch was measured after 200,000 punchings. For comparison, relative tool wear with AHSS was compared to Mild steel with A2 tooling, which was about 2000 ìm2 for the 200,000 punchings. Test results are shown in Figure 2-61.

Figure 2-61 – Punching up to DP 500/800 with surface treated high quality tool steels can be comparable to Mild steel with conventional tools.C-2 Burr height tests: The increasing burr height is often the reason for resharpening punching tools. For Mild steels the burr height increases continuously with tool wear. This was found not to be the case for the AHSS in Figure 2-62. Two AHSS tested were DP 500/800 and MS 1150/1400. The burr heights were measured in four locations and averaged. The averages for the two AHSS were so close that they are plotted as a single line.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-62 - Burr height comparison for Mild steel and AHSS as a function of the number of hits. Results for DP 500/800 and MS 1150/1400 are identical and shown as the AHSS curve.C-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-63

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

The plausible explanation for Figure 2-62 is that both materials initially have a burr height related to the material strength and the sharpness of the tools. AHSS has a more brittle fracture and therefore the burr height has a maximum possible height. This height is reached when the maximum local elongation is obtained during the punching, after which the burr height does not increase. The Mild steel, which is more formable, will continue to generate higher burr height with increased tool wear. The burr height increased with tool wear and increasing die clearance when punching Mild steel. AHSS may require a higher grade tool steel or surface treatment to avoid tool wear, but tool regrinding because of burrs should be less of a problem. Additional information on tool wear is contained in Section 2.C.4.a. Tool Materials.

2.C.6.c. Key Points  Clearances for blanking and shearing should increase as the strength of the material increases.  Burr height increases with tool wear and increasing die clearances for shearing Mild steel, but 

AHSS tends to maintain a constant burr height. This means extended intervals between tool sharpening may be applicable to AHSS parts. Laser cut blanks used during early tool tryout may not represent normal blanking, shearing, and punching quality. Production intent tooling should be used as early as possible in the development stage.

2.C.7. Press Requirements 2.C.7.a. Force versus Energy Both mechanical and hydraulic presses require three different capacities or ratings – maximum force, energy, and power. The most common press concern when forming higher strength steels is whether the press is designed to withstand the maximum force required to form the stamping. Therefore, press capacity (for example, 1000 kN) is a suitable number for the mechanical characteristics of a stamping press. Capacity, or tonnage rating, indicates the maximum force that the press can apply. However, the amount of force available depends on whether the press is hydraulic or mechanically driven. Hydraulic presses can exert maximum force during the entire stroke, whereas mechanical presses exert their maximum force at a specific displacement just prior to bottom dead center. At increased distances above bottom dead center, the press capacity is reduced.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-64

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Energy consumption inherent in sheet metal forming processes is related to the true stress-true strain curve and it depends on the yield strength and the work hardening behaviour characterized by the n-value. The energy required for plastically deforming a material (force times distance) corresponds to the area under the true stress-true strain curve. Figure 2-63 shows the true stress-strain curves for two materials with equal yield strength - HSLA 350/450 and DP 350/600. Many other true stress-true strain curves can be found in Figure 2-9.

Figure 2-63 - True stress-strain curves for two materials with equal yield strength.T-3 The higher work hardening of the DP grade requires higher press loads when compared to the HSLA at the same sheet thickness. However, the use of AHSS is normally coupled with a reduced thickness for the stamping and the required press load would be decreased or compensated. The higher n values also tend to flatten strain gradients and further reduce the peak strains. The required power is a function of applied forces, the displacement of the moving parts, and the speed. Predicting the press forces needed initially to form a part is known from a basic understanding of sheet metal forming. Different methods can be chosen to calculate drawing force, ram force, slide force, or blankholder force. The press load signature is an output from most computerized forming-process development programs, as well as special press load monitors.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-65

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Example: Press Force Comparisons The computerized forming process-development output (Figure 2-64) shows the press forces involved for drawing and embossing Mild steel approximately 1.5 mm thick, conventional HSS, and DP 350/600. It clearly shows that the forces required are dominated by the embossing phase rather than by the drawing phase.

Figure 2-64 - Data demonstrates that embossing dominates the required press force rather than the drawing force.H-3 Sometimes the die closing force is an issue because of the variety of draw-bead geometries that demand different closing conditions around the periphery of the stamping.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-66

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Example: Press Energy Comparisons A similar analysis (Figure 2-65) shows the press energy required to draw and emboss the same steels shown in Figure 2-64. The energy required is also dominated by the embossing phase rather than by the drawing phase, although the punch travel for embossing is only a fraction of the drawing depth.

Figure 2-65 - Data showing the energy required to emboss a component is greater than for the drawing component.H-3

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-67

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.7.b. Prediction of Press Forces Using Simulative Tests Relative press forces from Marciniak stretching tests showed AHSS grades require higher punch forces in stretch forming operations (Figure 2-66). However, applying the stretch forming mode for CP grades is not common due to the lower stretchability of CP grades.

Figure 2-66 - Punch forces from Marciniak cup-stretch forming tests for AHSS and conventional steel types.H-3

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-68

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.7.c. Extrapolation From Existing Production Data Relationships between thickness and UTS can be used as a quick extrapolation calculation of press loads for simple geometries. Figure 2-67 shows the measured press loads for the production of a cross member with a simple hat-profile made of HSLA 350/450 and DP 300/500 steels of the same thickness.

Figure 2-67 - Measured press load for a Hat-Profile Cross Member.T-3 Using the following equation, the press load F2 for DP 300/500 was estimated from the known press load F1 from HSLA 350/450.T-3 F2 is proportional to (F1) x (t2/t1) x (Rm2/Rm1) Where:

F1 Old Measured Drawing Force F2 New Estimated Drawing Force t1 Old Material Thickness t2 New Material Thickness Rm1 Old Tensile Strength Rm2 New Tensile Strength

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

The data above compares the measured drawing force and the estimated drawing force for the DP 300/500 using the formula. A good correlation between measured and predicted drawing force was obtained. While good force estimations are possible using this extrapolation technique, the accuracy is rather limited and often overstates the load. Therefore, the calculation should be viewed as an upper boundary.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-69

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.7.d. Computerized Forming-Process Development Rules of thumb are useful to estimate press loads. A better evaluation of press loads, such as draw force, embossment force, and blank holding force, can be obtained from computerized tools. Many of the programs enable the user to specify all of the system inputs. This is especially important when forming AHSS because the high rate of work hardening has a major effect on the press loads. In addition, instead of using a simple restraining force on blank movement, analyses of the physical draw beads must be calculated. Another important input to any calculation is the assumption that the tools are rigid during forming, when in reality the tools deform elastically in operation. This discrepancy leads to a significant increase in the determined press loads, especially when the punch is at home position. Hence, for a given part, the draw depth used for the determination of the calculated press load is an important parameter. For example, if the nominal draw depth is applied, press loads may be overestimated. The deflection (sometimes called breathing) of the dies is accentuated by the higher work hardening of the AHSS. Similarly, the structure, platens, bolsters, and other components of the press are assumed to be completely rigid. This is not true and causes variation in press loads, especially when physical tooling is moved from one press to another. If no proven procedure for computerized prediction is available, validation of the empirical calculations is recommended. Practical pressing tests should be used to determine the optimum parameter settings for the simulation. Under special situations, such as restrike operation, it is possible that computerized analyses may not give a good estimation of the press loads. In these cases, computerized tools can suggest forming trends for a given part and assist in developing a more favourable forming-process design. Most structural components include design features to improve local stiffness. Features requiring embossing processes are mostly formed near the end of the ram cycle. Predicting forces needed for such a process is usually based on press shop experiences applicable to conventional steel grades. To generate comparable numbers for AHSS grades, computerized forming process-development is recommended.

2.C.7.e. Case Study for Press Energy The following study is a computerized analysis of the energy required to form a cross member with a hatprofile and a bottom embossment at the end of the stroke (Figure 2-68).

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-68 - Cross-section of a component having a longitudinal embossment to improve stiffness locally.H-3

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-70

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Increasing energy is needed to continue punch travel. The complete required energy curves are shown in Figure 2-69 for Mild, HSLA 250/350, and DP 350/600 steels. The three dots indicate the start of the embossment formation at a punch movement of 85 mm.

Figure 2-69 - Computerized analysis showing the increase in energy needed to form the component with different steel grades. Forming the embossment begins at 85 mm of punch travel.H-3

The last increment of punch travel to 98 mm requires significantly higher energy, as shown in Figure 2-70. Throughout the punch travel however, the two higher strength steels appear to maintain a constant proportional increase over the Mild steel.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-70 - A further increase in energy is required to finish embossing.H-3

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-71

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.7.f. Setting Draw Beads A considerable force is required from a nitrogen-die cushion in a single-acting press to set draw beads in AHSS before drawing begins. The nitrogen-die cushion may be inadequate for optimum pressure and process control. In some cases, binder separation may occur because of insufficient cushion tonnage, resulting in a loss of control for the stamping process. The high impact load on the cushion may occur several inches up from the bottom of the press stroke. Since the impact point in the stroke is both a higher velocity point and a derated press tonnage, mechanical presses are very susceptible to damage due to these shock loads. Additional flywheel energy is dissipated by the high shock loads well above bottom dead center of the stroke. A double-action press will set the draw beads when the outer slide approaches bottom dead center where the full tonnage rating is available and the slide velocity is substantially lower. This minimizes any shock loads on die and press and resultant load spikes will be less likely to exceed the rated press capacity.

2.C.7.g. Key Points  Press loads are increased for AHSS steels primarily because of their increased work hardening.  More important than press force is the press energy required to continue production. The required   

energy can be visualized as area under the true stress–true strain curves. High forming loads and energy requirements in a typical hat-profile cross member with a strengthening bead in the channel base are due to the final embossing segment of the punch stroke compared to the pure drawing segment. DP 350/600 requires about twice the energy to form hat-profile cross member than the same cross member formed from Mild steel. While several punch force approximation techniques can be used for AHSS, the recommended procedure is computerized forming-process development.

2.C.8. Lubrication Lubrication is an important input to almost every sheet metal forming operation. The lubricants have the following interactions with the forming process: 1. Control metal flow from the binder. 2. Distribute strain over the punch. 3. Maximize/minimize the growth of strain gradients (deformation localization). 4. Reduce surface damage (galling and scoring). 5. Remove heat from the deformation zone. 6. Change the influence of surface coatings.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-72

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

All these effects become more important as the strength of the sheet metal increases. Therefore, special attention to lubrication is required when considering AHSS. Higher strength steels (both conventional and AHSS) have less capacity for stretch (less work hardening or n-value) over the punch or pullover plug to generate the required length of line. As the steel strength increases, more metal must flow from the binder into the die to compensate for the loss of length of line for a required part depth. Tensile stresses are applied to the metal under the binder in the radial direction (perpendicular to the die radius) to pull the metal towards the die radius. Compressive stresses can form in the circumferential direction (parallel to the die radius) as the blank reduces its circumferential length. While this compression usually happens in box corners, it also can happen in sidewall features that shorten the length of line while moving into the part. Metal flowing uncontrolled into a sidewall also can generate compressive circumferential stresses. These compressive stresses tend to buckle the binder metal rather than uniformly increase the local thickness. This buckling is following the law of least energy-forming mode in sheet metal forming. Less energy is required to form a local hinge (a buckle) using only few elements of the sheet metal compared to uniformly in-plane compressing the metal to generate an increase in thickness for a large number of elements. Weight reduction programs use higher strength steels to reduce the sheet metal thickness. The thinner sheet metal is more prone to buckling than thicker steels. Therefore, part designs utilizing AHSS with thinner sheets can require significantly increased blankholder forces to flatten buckles that form. Since restraining force is a function of the coefficient of friction (C.O.F.) times the blankholder force, the restraining force increases and metal flow decreases. Counter measures include an improvement in lubrication with a lower C.O.F. or other process change. Deforming higher strength steels (especially AHSS) requires more energy. The relative energy increase required to form a DP 350/600 versus an HSLA 350/450 is available in Figure 2-63. At any given value of strain, a vertical line is drawn. The energy required to deform each steel is the area under their respective true stress/true strain curves. Higher forming energy causes both the part and the die to increase in temperature. Lubricant viscosity decreases – usually with corresponding increase in C.O.F. Lubricant breakdown may occur causing first galling and then scoring of the sheet metal and dies. All these events increase blankholder-restraining force and defeat the goal of more metal flowing into the die. Draw beads in the binder area further complicate the problem. Likewise, increasing the number of parts per minute increases the amount of heat generated with a corresponding increase in sheet metal and die temperature. One key to solving the heat problem when forming higher strength steels is application of a better lubricant. The chemistries of these better lubricants are less prone to viscosity changes and lubricant breakdown. Water-based lubricants disperse more heat than oil-based lubricants. Some parts may require tunnels drilled inside the tooling for circulating cooling liquids. These tunnels target hot spots (thermal gradients) that tend to localize deformation leading to failures. Special emphasis by some lubricant companies to provide a stable, low C.O.F. lubricant is the dry (barrier) lubricant. These lubricants (mainly polymer based) completely separate the sheet metal from the die. The dry lube C.O.F. for the same sheet metal and die combination can be 0.03 compared to a good wet lubricant C.O.F. of 0.12 to 0.15. That means doubling the blankholder force to maintain very flat binders for joining purposes will still reduce the binder restraining force by one-half or more. That reduction in binder restraining force now allows much more metal flow into the die that the amount of punch stretching can drop from the FLC red failure zone to well into the green safe zone. The complete separation of sheet metal and die by the barrier lubricant also means isolation of any differences in coating characteristics. In addition, the C.O.F. tends to be temperature insensitive, resulting in a more robust forming system. Finally, a known and constant C.O.F. over the entire stamping greatly improves the accuracy of Computer Forming-Process Development (computerized die tryout).

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-73

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Key Points

 Lubrication helps control metal flow from the binder towards the die radius and into the part. Because   

many high strength parts have less stretch over the punch, different lubricant characteristics must enable additional metal flow in the binder. Increased metal strength and reduced sheet thickness for weight reduction require greater hold down forces. Maintaining metal flow in the binder requires a robust lubricant with a lower coefficient of friction. The increased energy to form many AHSS causes both part and die to increase in temperature. Increased temperature usually causes reduced lubricant viscosity and even lubricant breakdown resulting in galling and scoring. The dry barrier lubricants have several characteristics capable of reducing forming problems when making parts with AHSS.

2.C.9. Multiple Stage Forming 2.C.9.a. General Recommendations 1. If possible, form all mating areas in the first stage of a forming process and avoid reworking the same area in the next stages. 2. Design stamping processes so the number of forming stages is minimized. 3. Address potential springback issues as early as possible in the product design stage (design for springback):  Avoid right or acute angles.  Use larger open wall angles.  Avoid large transition radii between two walls.  Use open-end stamping (Figure 2-71) in preference to a close-end stamping. Multiple stage forming is recommended for stamping rails or other parts with hat-like cross-section, which consist of right angles. In this case, using a two-stage forming process gives much better geometry control than a single stage process. An example of such a process is shown in the figure below. In the first operation (Figure 2-71), all 90-degree radii and mating surfaces are formed using “gull-wing” processes with overbending to compensate for springback (note that a large radius is used in the top of the hat area). In the second stage, the top of the rail is flattened. Certain cases may require an overbending of the flat top section.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-71 - Two-stage forming to achieve a hat section with small radii.R-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-74

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Multiple forming is also recommended for parts that consist of small geometrical features of severe geometry that can be formed only in the re-strike operation. A part that has a variable cross section in combination with small geometrical features may need a coining operation in the second or last stage of the forming process. This is the only way to control the geometry.

2.C.9.b. Key Points   

Minimize the number of multiple forming stages. Address springback issues at the earliest possible stage. Multiple stage forming can assist in producing a square channel cross section.

2.C.10. In-service Requirements The microstructure of DP and TRIP steels increase the sheet metal forming capability, but also improve energy absorption in both a crash environment and fatigue life.

2.C.10.a. Crash Management DP and TRIP steels with ferrite as a major phase show higher energy absorbing property than conventional high-strength steels, particularly after pre-deformation and paint baking treatments. Two key features contribute to this high energy-absorbing property: high work hardening rate and large bake hardening (BH) effect. The relatively high work-hardening rate, exhibited by DP and TRIP steels, leads to a higher ultimate tensile strength than that exhibited by conventional HSS of similar yield strength. This provides for a larger area under the true stress-strain curve, and results in greater energy absorption when deformed in a crash event to the same degree as conventional steels. The high work hardening rate also causes DP and TRIP steels to work harden during forming processes to higher in-panel strength than similar YS HSS, further increasing the area under the stress-strain curve and crash energy absorption. Finally, the high work-hardening rate better distributes strain during crash deformation, providing for more stable, predictable axial crush that is crucial for maximizing energy absorption during a front or rear crash event. The relatively large BH effect also increases the energy absorption of DP and TRIP steels by further increasing the area under the stress-strain curve. The BH effect adds to the work hardening imparted by the forming operation. Conventional HSS do not exhibit a strong BH effect and therefore do not benefit from this strengthening mechanism.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-75

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-72 illustrates the difference in energy absorption between DP and TRIP steels as a function of their static (traditional tensile test speed) yield strength.

Figure 2-72 - Absorbed energy for square tube as function of static yield strength.T-2 Figure 2-73 shows calculated absorbed energy plotted against total elongation for a square tube component. The absorbed energy remains constant for the DP and TRIP steels but the increase in total elongation allows for formation into complex shapes. For a given crash-critical component, the higher elongations of DP and TRIP steels do not generally increase energy absorption compared to conventional HSS if all materials under consideration have sufficient elongation to accommodate the required crash deformation. In some applications, the DP and TRIP grades could increase energy absorption over that of a conventional HSS if the conventional steel does not have sufficient ductility to accommodate the required crash deformation and splits rather than fully completing the crush event. In the latter case, substituting DP or TRIP steel, with sufficient ductility to withstand full crash deformation, will improve energy absorption by restoring stable crush and permitting more material to absorb crash energy.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-73 - Calculated absorbed energy for a square tube as a function of total elongation.T-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-76

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.10.b. Fatigue The fatigue strength of DP steels is higher than that of precipitation-hardened steels or fully banitic steels of similar yield strength for many metallurgical reasons. For example, the dispersed fine martensite particles retard the propagation of fatigue cracks. For TRIP steels, the transformation of retained austenite can relax the stress field and introduce a compressive stress that can also improve fatigue strength. Figures 2-74 and 2-75 illustrate the improvements in fatigue capability.

Figure 2-74 - Fatigue characteristics of TRIP 450/780 steel compared to conventional steels.T-1

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-75 - Fatigue limit for AHSS compared to conventional steels.T-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-77

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.C.10.c. Key Points  DP and TRIP steels have increased energy absorption in a crash event compared to conventional  

HSS because of their high tensile strength, high work hardening rate, and large BH effect. The greater ductility of DP and TRIP steels permit use of higher strength, greater energy absorbing capacity material in a complex geometry that could not be formed from conventional HSS. DP and TRIP steels have better fatigue capabilities compared to conventional HSS of similar yield strength.

2.D. Tube Forming 2.D.1. High Frequency Welded Tubes Welded tubes are commonly produced from flat sheet material by continuous roll forming and a high frequency welding process. These types of tubes are widely used for automotive applications, such as seat structures, cross members, side impact beams, bumpers, engine subframes, trailing arms, and twist beams. Currently AHSS tubes up to grade DP 700/1000 are in commercial use in automotive applications. Tube manufacturing involves a sequence of processing steps (for example roll forming, welding, calibration, shaping) that influence the mechanical properties of the tube. During the tube manufacture process, both the YS and the UTS are increased while the total elongation is decreased. Subsequently, when manufacturing parts and components, the tubes are then formed by operations such as flaring, flattening, expansion, reduction, die forming, bending and hydroforming. The actual properties of the tube dictate the degree of success to which these techniques can be utilized. Published data on technical characteristics of tubes made of AHSS is limited. For example, the ULSAB-AVC programme deals only with those tubes and dimensions applied for the actual body structure (Table 2-3). Table 2-3- Examples of properties for as-shipped straight tubes from ULSAB-AVC project.I-1

The earlier ULSAC study resulted in design and manufacturing of demonstration hardware, which included AHSS tubes made of DP 500/800 material. The ULSAC Engineering Report provides the actual technical characteristics of those two tube dimensions used in the study: 55x30x1.5mm and Ø 34x1.0mm (see http://www.worldautosteel.org/projects/ulsac.aspx for more information).

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-78

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

The work hardening, which takes place during the tube manufacturing process, increases the YS and makes the welded AHSS tubes appropriate as a structural material. Mechanical properties of welded AHSS tubes (Figure 2-76) show welded AHSS tubes provide excellent engineering properties. In comparison with HSLA steel tubes, the AHSS tubes offer an improved combination of strength, formability, and good weldability. AHSS tubes are suitable for structures and offer competitive advantage through highenergy absorption, high strength, low weight, and cost efficient manufacturing.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-76 - Anticipated Total Elongation and Yield Strength of AHSS tubes.R-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-79

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

The degree of work hardening, and consequently the formability of the tube, depends both on the steel grade and the tube diameter/thickness ratio (D/T) as shown in Figure 2-76. Depending on the degree of work hardening, the formability of tubular materials is reduced compared to the as-produced sheet material. Bending AHSS tubes follows the same laws that apply to ordinary steel tubes. One method to evaluate the formability of a tube is the minimum bend radius, which utilizes the total elongation (A5) defined with proportional test specimen by tensile test for the actual steel grade and tube diameter. The minimum Centerline Radius (CLR) is defined as:

Computerized forming-process development utilizes the actual true stress-true strain curve, which is measured for the actual steel grade and tube diameter. Figure 2-77 contains examples of true stress-true strain curves for AHSS tubes.

Figure 2-77 - Examples of true stress-true strain curves for AHSS tubes.R-1

However, it is important to note that the bending behaviour of tube depends on both the tubular material and the bending technique. The weld seam is also an area of non-uniformity in the tubular cross section. Thus, the weld seam influences the forming behaviour of welded tubes. The first recommended procedure is to locate the weld area in a neutral position during the bending operation. The characteristics of the weld depend on the actual steel sheet parameters (that is chemistry, microstructure, strength) and the set-up of the tube manufacturing process. The characteristics of the high frequency welds in DP steel tubes are discussed in more detail in Section 3 – 3.B.2.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-80

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figures 2-78 and 2-79 provide examples of the forming of AHSS tubes.

Figure 2-78 - Hydroformed Engine Cradle made from welded DP 280/600 tube with YS ≈ 540 N/ mm2; TS ≈ 710 N/mm2; Total Elongation ≈ 34%. Draw bending, Centerline Bending Radius = 1.6 x D, Bending Angle > 90 Degrees.R-1

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-79 - Bending test of welded DP 350/600 tube with YS » 610 N/mm2; TS ≈ 680 N/mm2; Total Elongation ≈ 27%. Booster bending, Centerline Bending Radius = 1.5 x D, Bending Angle = 45 Degrees.R-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-81

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.D.2. Laser Welded Tailored Tubes Tube products for chassis applications produced by conventional HF weld process (as previously described) receive their properties during a traditional tube making processes (such as roll-forming and widely used HF-welding). For body structures, thin-wall tube sections are recommended as a replacement for spot-welded box-shape components. To meet further demands for even thinner gauges (with different metal inner and outer surface coatings in all AHSS grades that are more sensitive to work hardening) an alternative manufacturing process is required to maintain the sheet metal properties in the as-rolled sheet conditions. Laser welding, used extensively for tailored welded blanks, creates a very narrow weld seam. Sheet metals with dissimilar thickness and/or strengths are successfully used to achieve required weight savings by eliminating additional reinforcement parts. Further weld improvements have been made during the steadily increasing series-production of laser welded blanks. Part consolidation utilizing hydroforming is one strategy to simultaneously save both cost and weight. With hydroforming technology, the next step in tubular components is to bring the sheet metal into a shape closer to the design of the final component without losing tailored blank features (Figure 2-80).

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figures 2-80 - Mechanical properties of tailored tubes are close to the original metal properties in the sheet condition.G-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-82

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

The tailored tube production process allows the designer to create complex variations in shape, thickness, strength, and coating. (Figure 2-81). The shape complexity, however, is limited by the steel grades and mechanical properties available.

Figure 2-81 - Laser welded, tailored tube examples and required pre-blank shapes.F-1 A) 1-piece cylindrical tube B) 2-piece tailored tube C) Patchwork tube D) 1-piece conical tube

Conical tailored tubes, designed for front rail applications, with optimized lightweight and crash management are one opportunity to cope with auto body-frame architecture issues. In frontal crash and side impacts the load paths have a key importance on the body design as they have a major bearing on the configuration of the structural members and joints. Figure 2-82 is an example of a front-rail hydroformed prototype. The conical tailored tubes for this purpose take advantage of the high work hardening potential of TRIP steel.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-82- Front-rail prototype based on a conical tube having 40 mm end to end difference in diameter.F-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-83

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.D.3. Key Points  Due to the cold working generated during tube forming, the formability of the tube is reduced compared to the as-received sheet.

 The work hardening during tube forming increases the YS and TS, thereby allowing the tube to be  

a structural member. Laser welded tubes create a very narrow weld seam. The weld seam should be located at the neutral axis of the tube, whenever possible during the bending operation.

2.E. Hydroforming (Tubes) 2.E.1. Pre-Form Bending As discussed in the previous section, AHSS will initially work harden (increase strength) during the initial tube making process and then continue to work harden more with each forming step in the hydroforming process. For example, tube manufacturing involves a sequence of processing steps - roll forming, welding, calibration, shaping. During the tube manufacturing process, both the YS and the UTS increase while the total elongation and residual stretchability decrease. The same is true during the pre-form bending of the tube. In the area of the tube where the pre-form bending stresses are concentrated, the YS and the UTS will increase in the deformation zone while the total elongation and stretchability decrease locally. When considering production of a hydroformed part, both product and tool designs must account for these increased strengths and reduced formability parameters. Careful consideration is required to avoid exceeding the available total elongation for bending limits or forming limits - especially for stretchability formations in the finished part that are located in the area of a preform bend. Refer to Figure 2-76 for anticipated elongation values for several illustrative high strength steels formed into tubes of various D/T ratios. The deformation available for the pre-form bend process and the subsequent hydroforming process will depend on the material selected, tube D/T ratio, tube manufacturing process, centreline radius of the preform bend, and the included angle of the bend. Referring to figure 2-76 of the previous section, tubes of higher strength AHSS will have limited elongation available. Therefore, analysis of part designs is required to avoid exceeding the various forming limits imposed by the chosen material. Automotive roof rail sections have incorporated hydroformed parts for several years. The ULSAB-AVC also used this type of construction. More recent vehicles have used much higher strength AHSS to improve roof strength (Figure 2-83).

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-83 – Photos of a North American 2008 truck roof rail using AHSS hydroformed section.P-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-84

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

2.E.2. Forming The hydroforming process for tubes usually involves expanding the tube diameter from 3% to 30% depending on the design, materials selected and pressures available for forming. Tube production commonly utilizes one of three basic methods of hydroforming tubes. The first two are low-pressure and high-pressure processes. The low-pressure begins with a tube whose circumference is slightly less than the final circumference of the finished geometry. After placing the tube in an open die, the tube is pressurized. As the die closes, the circumference of the tube changes shape to conform to the closing die. The pressure is sufficient to prevent the tube from buckling during the shape change. The key is very little increase in the circumference to allow high strength and reduced formability metals to achieve tighter radii without failure. This low-pressure process is suitable for tubes made from AHSS. The second process is high-pressure tube hydroforming. Here the tube is placed in the die and the die is closed. Pressurizing the tube now causes the metal to stretch as the circumference increases to conform to the inner circumference of the die – often with tight radii in corners and product features. Higher strength steels may be unable to expand sufficiently to fill the die geometry or create small radii without failure. However, high pressure could be necessary to obtain the correct geometry with minimum springback or fewer wrinkles compared to low pressure hydroforming. A third process reduces the severity of circumferential expansion by “end feeding.” Special end pistons push additional material into the die cavity from the tube end to provide more material for higher expansion of the tube circumference. This method of tube circumference expansion involves bi-directional strain. The end feeding is beneficial for hydroforming tubes from AHSS. Hydroforming AHSS tubes require highly developed forming limit charts that utilize tube D/T, degree of preform bend, and final geometrical shape. Currently, these data are limited for AHSS beyond DP steels with a tensile strength greater than 600 MPa. The availability of forming limit charts will improve as new applications develop rapidly. To assist with very early process and die design, computerized forming-process development is an excellent tool for examining the validity of applying different AHSS to potential part designs. Figures 2-84 and 2-85 illustrate two hydroformed production parts.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Figure 2-84 – This duplicate of Figure 2-78 shows the two potential problem areas (circled) for a hydroformed Engine Cradle made from welded DP 280/600 tube .R-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-85

Version

4.1

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Figure 2-85 - Opal Speedster, Pontiac Solstice and Saturn Sky main body side rail: Tube DIA 132 mm, Gauge 1.8 mm, D/T = 73, Finished length 4070mm, DP 350/600.A-7

2.E.3. Post Forming Trimming For trimming and piercing, the same general cautions utilized for stamped AHSS parts apply to hydroformed AHSS parts. Since AHSS have higher tensile strength than conventional high-strength steels, engineering the trim tools to withstand higher loads is a requirement. Proper support for the trim stock during the trim operation also is very important to minimize edge cracking. Laser trimming, which is common for hydroformed parts, is still an excellent choice. However, evaluating the hardening effects of the laser beam on the trimmed edge is required.

2.E.4. Design Considerations Today, hydroformed parts are widely used for automotive applications, such as seat structures, cross members, side impact beams, bumpers, engine subframes, trailing arms, roof rails and twist beams. Currently, AHSS tubes up to grade DP 700/1000 are in commercial use in automotive applications. In general, the same design guidelines that support hydroforming of conventional steels apply to AHSS. However, additional attention to the available elongation for forming and part function is required as a part design and manufacturing processes are developed.

2.E.5. Key Points  Tube hydroforming is a current production process for making numerous structural parts.  Those AHSS tubes with higher yield and tensile strengths but lower total elongations and stretchability  

limits will limit some hydroformed tube designs. The total summation of forming deformation is required from all stages of product development, which includes creating the initial tube, pre-bending, hydraulic circumferential expansion, and forming of local features. AHSS tube trimming and piercing have similar cautions as AHSS stamped part trimming and piercing.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 2-86

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 2 - Forming

Version

4.1

Section 3 Joining

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Section 3 - Joining

3.A. General Comments The application of AHSS provides its largest benefit in the potential for safety and mass reduction. With the application of thinner AHSS, material savings and/or improved crash energy management can be achieved. AHSS are produced uncoated, EG, HDG, and GA. Unless differences are highlighted, joining coated and uncoated AHSS is the same as conventional steels. The AHSS Applications Guidelines document utilizes a steel designation system to minimize regional confusion about the mechanical properties when comparing AHSS to conventional high strength steels. The format is Steel Type YS/TS in MPa. Therefore, HSLA 350/450 would have minimum yield strength of 350 MPa and minimum tensile strength of 450 MPa. The designation also highlights different yield strengths for steel grades with equal tensile strengths, thereby allowing some assessment of the stress-strain curves and amount of work hardening. AHSS can be satisfactorily welded for automotive applications. AHSS differ from Mild steels by chemical composition and microstructure. In AHSS, higher strengths are achieved by modifying the steel microstructure. The as-received microstructure will be changed while welding AHSS. The higher the heat input, the greater the effect on the microstructure. Due to fast cooling rates typical in welding, it is normal to see martensite and/or bainite microstructures in the weld metal and in the HAZ. When joining AHSS, production process control is important for successful assembly. Manufacturers with highly developed joining control methodology will experience no major change in their operations. Others may require additional checks and maintenance. In certain instances, modifications to equipment or processing methodologies may be required for successful joining of AHSS. The coating methods for AHSS are similar to those for Mild steels. Welding of either AHSS or Mild steels with coatings will generate fumes. The amount and nature of fumes will depend on the coating thickness, coating composition, joining method, and fillers used to join these materials. The fumes may contain some pollutants. The chemical composition of fumes and the relevant exhaust equipment must meet appropriate regulatory standards. Thicker coatings and higher heat inputs cause more fumes. Additional exhaust systems should be installed. While welding AHSS (with or without metallic or organic coatings and oiled or not oiled) gases and weld fumes are created similar to Mild steels. The allowed fumes or gases have to comply with respective national rules and regulations. The intent of these guidelines is to provide information regarding aspects of the joining processes – recognizing that more data is needed in some areas to be complete.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-1

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.B. Welding Procedures 3.B.1. Resistance Welding 3.B.1.a. Weld Schedule Application guidelines provided are of a general nature. Specific weld schedules and other detailed information are not provided because there are many differences between each manufacturer’s methods and equipment. If any type of AHSS (DP, TRIP, CP, FB, or MS) is used for the first time, the user should take the welding schedules applied to Mild steel and then: · Increase the electrode force by 20% or more depending on yield strength. · Increase weld time as appropriate. If these changes are insufficient, then try these additional changes: · A multi-pulse welding schedule (several pulses or post heating). · Larger tip diameter and/or change the type of electrode. · Increase the minimum weld size. When resistance welded, AHSS require less current than conventional Mild steel or HSLA because AHSS have higher electrical resistivity. Therefore, current levels for AHSS are not increased and may even need to be reduced depending on material chemical composition. However, most AHSS grades may require higher electrode forces for equivalent thickness of Mild steels because electrode force depends on material strength. If thick Mild steel or HSLA steel (of the same thickness) is replaced by an equivalent thickness of AHSS, the same forces may be required during assembly welding. AHSS often have tighter weld windows (welding parameters that give acceptable welds) when compared to Mild steels, as shown in the Figure 3-1.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Figure 3-1 - Schematic weld lobes of AHSS, HSLA and Mild steel with a shift to lower currents for increased strength grades.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-2

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

A more extensive weld study T-5 of three DP HDGA (45/45 g/m2) coated steels showed similar welding behaviour for all three steels. The 1.6 mm-thick steels were DP 340/600, DP 420/800, and DP 550/1000. To characterize the welding behaviour of the steels, useful current ranges and static weld tensile tests were performed. The useful current range is the difference between the welding current required to produce a minimum button size (I min) and the current that causes expulsion of weld metal (Imax). In this study, the minimum button size was defined as 4 t, where t is the nominal sheet thickness. The use of 4 t as the minimum button diameter, where t is the nominal sheet thickness, is generally used in the automotive and steel industries. The weld current range was 2.2 kA for the DP 340/600 and DP 420/800 and 2.5 kA for the DP 550/1000 steel (Figure 3-2). These current ranges are sufficiently wide to weld successfully the DP steels. The study also found no weld imperfections, which means these three DP steels are wieldable with simple, easy to use welding parameters.

Figure 3-2 - Welding current ranges for 1.6 mm HDGA DP steels with minimum tensile strengths of 590, 780, and 980 MPa.T-5

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-3

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Average reported weld hardness was 380 HV for the DP 340/600 and 415 HV for the other two. Again all three DP steels had similar weld hardness distributions. The study also concluded that weld fracture mode alone is not a good indicator of weld integrity and performance. The load to failure should be considered more important in judging weld integrity. A second study T-6 compared two 1.6 mm-thick HDGA (45/45 g/m2) steels: DP 420/800 and TRIP 420/800. The weld current range for 18 cycles weld time was similar: 1.4 kA for the DP 420/800 and 1.5 kA for the TRIP 420/800. The average weld hardness was 400 HV for both steels. The study concluded that acceptable welds with no imperfections can be produced in both steel grades. Both steel grades are readily wieldable with easily adoptable welding parameters. Weld tensile strength differences between the two steels were small and not considered statistically significant. Weld schedules (Figure 3-3) with pulsed current profiles for AHSS can have weld-current ranges similar to Mild steel. Even though there is no increased tendency for weld expulsion with AHSS, avoiding weld expulsion is highly desirable with AHSS. Loss of nugget material can affect weld-nugget size and strength.

Figure 3-3 – Schematics of optimized weld schedules for AHSS.B-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-4

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Post annealing (tempering pulse weld schedule) of TRIP steel may alter weld fracture mode (Figure 3-4) and weld current range (Figure 3-5). However, since studies have shown that the occurrence of partial or interfacial fractures does not necessarily indicate poor weld quality, the use of pulsed current is not required to improve weld quality. Further, the effect of current pulsing on tensile and fatigue properties, as well as the electrode tip life, is not known. Therefore, users should perform their own evaluations regarding the suitability of such modified parameters.

Figure 3-4 - Effect of tempering pulse weld schedule on TRIP steels.B-1

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Figure 3-5 - Post-annealing may enlarge weld current range.B-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-5

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.B.1.b. Coating Effects One of the methods by which the coatings are applied to the steel sheet surface is through a process called hot-dipping (HD). In this process, continuous coils of steel sheet are pulled at a controlled speed through a bath containing molten zinc. The zinc reacts with the steel and forms a bond. The excess liquid metal sticking on the sheet surface as it exits the bath is wiped off using a gas wiping process to achieve a controlled coating weight or thickness per unit area. As mentioned earlier, AHSS are commercially available with hot-dipped Galvannealed (HDGA) or hot-dipped galvanize (HDGI) coatings. Galvanize coatings contain essentially pure zinc with about 0.3 to 0.6 weight percent aluminum. The term “galvanize” comes from the galvanic protection that zinc provides to steel substrate when exposed to a corroding medium. A Galvannealed coating is obtained by additional heating of the zinc-coated steel at 450 – 590 °C (840 – 1100 °F) immediately after the steel exits the molten zinc bath. This additional heating allows iron from the substrate to diffuse into the coating. Due to the diffusion of iron and alloying with zinc, the final coating contains about 90% zinc and 10% iron. Due to the alloying of zinc in the coating with diffused iron, there is no free zinc present in the Galvannealed coating. A study T-7 was undertaken to examine whether differences exist in the resistance spot welding behavior of DP 420/800 with a HDGA coating compared to a HDGI coating. The resistance spot welding evaluations consisted of determining the welding current ranges for the steels with HDGA and HDGI coatings. Sheartension and cross-tension tests also were performed on spot welds made on steels with both HDGA and HDGI coatings. Weld cross sections from both types of coatings were examined for weld quality. Weld microhardness profiles provided hardness variations across the welds. Cross sections of HDGA and HDGI coatings, as well as the electrode tips after welding, were examined using a scanning electron microscope. Composition profiles across the coating depths were analyzed using a glow-discharge optical emission spectrometer to understand the role of coating in resistance spot welding. Contact resistance was measured to examine its contribution to the current required for welding. The results indicated that DP 420/800 showed similar overall welding behavior with HDGA and HDGI coatings. One difference noted between the two coatings was that HDGA required lower welding current to form the minimum nugget size. This may not be an advantage in the industry given the current practice of frequent electrode tip dressing. Welding current range for HDGA was wider than for HDGI. However, the welding current range of 1.6 kA obtained for HDGI coated steel compared to 2.2 kA obtained for the HDGA coated steel is considered sufficiently wide for automotive applications and should not be an issue for consideration of its use.(Figure 3-6).

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Figure 3-6 - Welding current ranges for 1.6 mm DP 420/800 with HDGA and HDGI coatings.T-7

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-6

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.B.1.c. Heat Balance - Material Balance - Thickness Balance Heat input is defined as:

Heat Input = I2Rt Where: I = Welding current R = Interfacial and bulk resistance between two sheets t = Welding time The heat input has to be changed depending on the gauge and grade of the steel. Compared to low strength steel at a particular gauge, the AHSS at the same gauge will need less current. Similarly, the thin gauge material needs less current than thick gauge. Controlling the heat input according to the gauge and grade is called heat balance in resistance spot welding. For constant thickness, Table 3-1 shows steel classification based on strength level. With increasing group numbers, higher electrode force, longer weld time, and lower current are required for satisfactory resistance spot welding. Material combinations with one group difference can be welded with little or no changes in weld parameters. Difference of two or three groups may require special considerations in terms of electrode cap size, force, or type of power source. Table 3-1 - Steel classification for resistance spot weld purposes.

For a particular steel grade, changes in thickness may require adoption of special schedules to control heat balance. When material type and gage are varied together, specific weld schedules may need to be developed. Due to the higher resistivity of AHSS, the nugget growth occurs preferentially in AHSS. Electrode life on the AHSS-side may be reduced due to higher temperature on this side. In general, electrode life when welding AHSS may be similar to Mild steel because of lower operating current requirement due to higher bulk resistivity in AHSS. This increase in electrode life may be offset in production due to poor part fit up created by higher AHSS springback. Frequent tip dressing will maintain the electrode tip shape and help achieve consistently acceptable quality welds.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-7

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.B.1.d. Welding Current Mode AHSS can be welded with power sources operated with either AC or DC types (Figure 3-7). Mid-frequency direct current (MFDC) has an advantage over conventional alternate current (AC) due to both unidirectional and continuous current. These characteristics assist in controlling and directing the heat generation at the interface. Current mode has no significant difference in weld quality. It should be noted that both AC and DC can easily produce acceptable welds where thickness ratios are less than 2:1. However, some advantage may be gained using DC where thickness ratios are over 2:1, but welding practices must be developed to optimize the advantages. It also has been observed that nugget sizes are statistically somewhat larger when using DC welding with the same secondary weld parameters than with AC. Some studies have shown that welding with MFDC provides improvements in heat balance and weld process robustness when there is a thickness differential in AHSS (as shown in Figure 3-8). DC power sources have been reported to provide better power factors and lower power consumption than AC power sources. Specifically, it has been reported that AC requires about 10 percent higher energy than DC to make the same size weld. L-7 Consult safety requirements for your area when considering MFDC welding for manual weld gun applications. The primary feed to the transformers contains frequencies and voltages higher than for AC welding.

Figure 3-7 - Range for 1.4 mm DP 350/600 cold-rolled steel at different current modes with single pulse.L-2

(a) Insufficient fusion at the interface with AC power source.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

(b) Button size of 3.5 mm with DC power source

Figure 3-8 - Effect of current mode on dissimilar thickness stack-up.L-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-8

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.B.1.e. Electrode Geometry Although there are differences in weld process depending on weld tip material and shape (truncated cone and dome shape), AHSS can be welded with all weld tip shapes and materials. Dome shaped electrodes ensure buttons even at lower currents due to higher current densities at the centre of the dome shape (Figure 3-9). The curve of dome-shaped electrodes will help to decrease the effect of electrode misalignment. However, dome electrodes might have less electrode life on coated steels without frequent tip dressing. Due to round edges, the dome electrode will have fewer tendencies to have surface cracks when compared with truncated electrode.

Figure 3-9 - The effect of electrode geometry on current range using AC power mode and single pulse.L-2

3.B.1.f. Part Fit-up Resistance welding depends on the interfacial resistance between two sheets. Good and consistent fit-up of parts is important to all resistance welding. Part fit-up is even more critical to the welding of AHSS due to increased yield strength and greater springback. In case of poor or inconsistent part fit-up, large truncated cone electrodes are recommended for both AHSS and conventional steels. The larger cap size will have large current range, which might compensate for the poor part fit-up. Also, progressive electrode force and upslope can be used to solve poor part fit-up.

3.B.1.g. Factory Equipment Template Equipment for welding AHSS should be capable of delivering higher electrode force than that required for welding Mild steel.

3.B.1.h. Judging Weldability Using Carbon Equivalence Existing carbon equivalence formulas for resistance spot welding of steels do not adequately predict weld performance in AHSS. Weld quality depends on variables such as thickness, strength, loading mode, and weld size. New formulae are proposed by various entities. Because there is no universally accepted formula, use of any one CE equation is not possible and users should develop their own CE equations based on their experience.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-9

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.B.1.i. Zinc Penetration/Contamination Surface quality of coated AHSS spot welds is similar to Mild steel spot welds. Surface cracking propensity is less with rounded-edge dome electrodes than with sharp-edge truncated cone electrodes. Fatigue performance is the same for spot welds with and without surface cracks appearing within the weld indentation region. See Figure 3-10:

Figure 3-10 – Schematic defining Indentation Region and Penetration.

3.B.1.j. Weld Integrity: Test Method and Joint Performance Acceptable Weld Integrity Criteria Acceptable weld integrity criteria vary greatly among manufacturers and world regions. Each AHSS user needs to establish their own weld acceptance criteria and the characteristics of AHSS resistance spot welds. AHSS spot weld strength is higher than that of the Mild steel for a given button size (Figure 3-11). It is important to note that partial buttons (plugs) or interfacial fractures do not necessarily characterize a failed spot weld in AHSS. Interfacial fractures may be typical of smaller weld sizes in Mild steel or in all weld sizes in AHSS. Reference is made to the new Specification AWS/ANSI D8.1 Weld Quality Acceptance for additional details.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Figure 3- 11 - Load bearing capacity of spot welds on various cold-rolled steels.L-2 Steel type, grade, and any coatings are indicated on the bars.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-10

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Destructive and In-Process Weld Testing Peel and chisel testing of resistance spot welds in AHSS may produce fracture through the weld during destructive or teardown testing. This type of fracture becomes more common with increasing sheet thickness and base material strength. Weld metal fracture may accompany significant distortion of the metal immediately adjacent to the weld during testing. Such distortion is shown in Figures 3-12 and 3-13. Under these conditions weld metal fracture may not accurately predict serviceability of the joint. Weld performance of AHSS depends on microstructure, loading mode, loading rate, and degree of constraint on the weld.

Figure 3-12- Example of laboratory dynamic destructive chisel testing of DP 300/500 EG 0.65 mm samples.M-1

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Figure 3-13 - Example of laboratory dynamic destructive chisel testing of DP 350/600 GI 1.4 mm samples.M-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-11

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Additionally, because of inherent stiffness of AHSS sheets, “non-destructive” chisel testing (Figure 3-14) on AHSS spot welded panels will deform the panel permanently and may promote weld metal fracture. Therefore, this type of in-process weld check method is not recommended for AHSS with thicknesses greater than 1.0 mm. Alternative test methods should be explored for use in field-testing of spot welds in AHSS.

Figure 3-14 - Semi-destructive chisel testing in DP300/500 EG 0.8 mm. M-1

Ultrasonic non-destructive spot weld testing has gained acceptance with some manufacturers. It still needs further development before it can replace destructive weld testing completely. Some on-line real time systems to monitor the resistance welding are currently available and are being used in some weld shops. Shear-Tension Strength of Welds and Fracture Modes The AHSS weld tensile strength is proportional to material tensile properties and is higher than Mild steel spot weld strength (Figure 3-15).

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Figure 3-15 - Tensile shear strength of single spot welds.L-4

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-12

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

While testing thick AHSS spot welds (from small button size to expulsion button) the fracture mode during shear-tension testing may change from interfacial to button pull out or plug (as shown in Figure 3-16). Despite interfacial fractures (Figure 3-16A), welds in AHSS may show high load bearing capacity. In thin gauge steels, the failure is often in a button or plug (Figure 3-17).

A

B

Figure 3-16- Fracture modes in thick (1.87mm) DP 700/980 CR during tension shear testing. (A) Interfacial fracture (low currents). (B) Fracture by button pull out (high currents).L-2

Figure 3-17 - Fracture modes in thin (0.65 mm) DP 300/500 EG during tension shear testing.L-2 In a recently published L-6 study, finite element modelling and fracture mechanics calculations were used to predict the resistance spot weld failure mode and loads in shear-tension tests of Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS). The results were compared to those obtained for an interstitial-free (IF) steel. The results of the work confirmed the existence of a competition between two different types of failure modes, namely full button pull-out and interfacial fracture. The force required to cause a complete weld button pull-out type failure was found to be proportional to the tensile strength and the thickness of the base material as well as the diameter of the weld. The force to cause an interfacial weld fracture was related to the fracture toughness of the weld, sheet thickness, and weld diameter. For high strength steels, it was determined that there is a critical sheet thickness above which the expected failure mode could transition from pull-out to interfacial fracture. In this analysis, it was shown that, as the strength of the steel increases, the fracture toughness of the weld required to avoid interfacial failure must also increase. Therefore, despite higher load carrying capacity due to their high hardness, the welds in high strength steels may be prone to interfacial fractures. Tensile testing showed that the load carrying capacity of the samples that failed via interfacial fracture was found to be more than 90% of the load associated with a full button pull-out. This indicates that the load bearing capacity of the welds is not affected by the fracture mode. Therefore, the mode of failure should not be the only criteria used to judge the quality of spot welds. The load bearing capacity of the weld should be the primary focus in the evaluation of the shear-tension test results in AHSS.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-13

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Fatigue Strength of Spot Welds In a comparative study L-6 of the spot weld fatigue strength of various steels grades, some of which included grades such as1.33-mm fully stabilized FS 300/420 (HDGA), 1.35-mm DP 340/600 (HDGA), 1.24-mm TRIP 340/600 (HDGA), and 1.41-mm TRIP 340/600 (HDGA), it was concluded that base metal microstructure/ properties have relatively little influence on spot weld fatigue behavior (Figure 3-18). However, DP 340/600 and TRIP 340/600 steels have slightly better spot weld fatigue performance than conventional low strength AKDQ steels. Further, it was found that the fatigue strength of spot welds is mainly controlled by design factors such as sheet thickness and weld diameter. Therefore, if down-gauging with high strength steels is considered, design changes should be considered necessary to maintain durability of spot welded assemblies.

Figure 3-18 - Tensile-Shear spot weld fatigue endurance curves for various high strength steels. The data are normalized to account for differences in sheet thickness and weld size. Davidson’s data in the plot refer to historical data.L-6

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-14

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Similar to Mild steel, an increase in the number of welds in AHSS will increase the component fatigue strength (Figure 3-19). Multiple welds on AHSS will increase the fatigue strength more than Mild steel.

Figure 3-19 - Effect of increase in number of welds in Mild steel and DP steel components.S-4 Figure 3-20 is a best-fit curve through numerous data points obtained from Mild steel, DP steels with tensile strengths ranging from 500 to 980 MPa, and MS steel with a tensile strength of 1400 MPa. The curve indicates that the fatigue strength of single spot welds does not depend on the base material strength.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Figure 3-20 - A best fit curve through many data points for Mild steel, DP steels, and MS steel. Fatigue strength of single spot welds does not depend on base metal strength.L-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-15

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.B.2. High Frequency Induction Welding High Frequency Induction Welding (HFIW) is the main welding technology for manufacturing cold-formed welded steel tubes. Welded tubes are normally made from flat sheet material by continuous roll forming and the HFIW process. The tubes are widely used for automotive applications, including seat structures, cross members, side impact structures, bumpers, subframes, trailing arms, and twist beams. A welded tube can be viewed as a sheet of steel having the shape of a closed cross-section. Two features distinguish the welded tube from the original sheet material: 1. The work hardening which takes place during the tube forming process. 2. The properties and metallurgy of the weld seam differ from those of the base metal in the tubular cross-section. Good weldability is one precondition for successful high frequency welding. Most DP steels are applicable as feed material for manufacturing of AHSS tubes by continuous roll forming and the HFIW process. The quality and the characteristics of the weld depend on the actual steel sheet characteristics (such as chemistry, microstructure, and strength) and the set-up of the tube manufacturing process. Table 3-2 provides some characteristics of the high frequency welds in tubes made of DP 280/600 steel. Table 3-2 - Transverse tensile test data for HFIW DP 280/600 tube.R-1

For DP 280/600 the hardness of the weld area exceeds the hardness of the base material (Figure 3-21). There is a limited or no soft zone in the transition from HAZ to base material. The nonexistent soft zone yields a high frequency weld that is stronger than the base material (Table 3-2). This is an essential feature in forming applications where the tube walls and weld seam are subject to transverse elongation, such as in radial expansion and in hydroforming.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Figure 3-21 - Weld hardness of a high frequency weld in a DP 280/600 tube.R-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-16

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Figures 3-22 and 3-23 contain additional examples of the hardness distribution across high frequency welds in different materials with comparison to Mild steel.

Figure 3-22 - Hardness variation across induction welds for various types of steel.M-1

Figure 3-23 - Hardness variation across induction welds of DP 350/600 to Mild steel.D-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-17

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.B.3. Laser Welding - Fusion 3.B.3.a. Butt Welds and Tailor Welded Products AHSS grades can be laser butt-welded and are used in production of tailored products (tailor welded blanks and tubes). The requirements for edge preparation of AHSS are similar to Mild steels. In both cases, a good quality edge and a good fit-up are critical to achieve good quality welds. The blanking of AHSS needs higher shear loads than Mild steel sheets (see unit on Blanking, shearing, and trim operations in Section 2.C.6.). If a tailored product is intended for use in a forming operation, a general stretchability test such as the Erichsen (Olsen) cup test can be used for assessment of the formability of the laser weld. AHSS with tensile strengths up to 800 MPa show good Erichsen test values (Figure 3-24). The percent stretchability in the Erichsen test = 100 x the ratio of stretchability of weld to stretchability of base metal.

Figure 3-24 - Hardness and stretchability of laser butt welds with two AHSS sheets of the same thickness. Erichsen test values describe the stretchability.B-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-18

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

The hardness of the laser welds for AHSS is higher than for Mild steels (Figure 3-24). However, good stretchability ratios in the Erichsen test can be achieved when the difference in hardness between weld metal and base metal is only slightly higher for AHSS compared to Mild steels. If the hardness of the weld is too high, a post-annealing treatment (using HF-equipment or a second laser scan) may be used to reduce the hardness and improve the stretchability of the weld (see TRIP steel in Figures 3-24 and 3-25).

Figure 3-25 - Improved stretchability of AHSS laser welds with an induction heating post heat treatment. Testing performed with Erichsen cup test.T-3

Laser butt-welded AHSS of very high strength (for example MS steels) have higher strength than GMAW welded joints. The reason is that the high cooling rate in the laser welding process prompts the formation of hard martensite and the lower heat input reduces the soft zone of the HAZ. Laser butt-welding is also used for welding tubes (see unit on Tube Forming in Section 2.D.).

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-19

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.B.3.b. Assembly Laser Welding Laser welding is often used for AHSS overlap joints. This type of weld is either a conventional weld with approximately 50% penetration in the bottom sheet or an edge weld. Welding is performed in the same way as for Mild steels, but the clamping forces needed for a good joint fit-up are often higher with AHSS than for Mild steels. To achieve good laser welded overlap joints for zinc-coated AHSS, a small intermittent gap (0.10.2 mm) between the sheets is recommended, which is identical to zinc coated Mild steels. In this way the zinc does not get trapped in the melt, avoiding pores and other imperfections. An excessive gap can create an undesirable underfill on the topside of the weld. Some solutions for lap joint laser welding zinc-coated material are shown in Figure 3-26. Recent studies L-5 have shown welding zinc-coated steels can be done without using a gap between the overlapped sheets. This is accomplished through the use of dual laser beams. While the first beam is used to heat and evaporate the zinc coating, the second beam performs the welding. The dual laser beam configuration combines two laser focussing heads through the use of custom-designed fixtures.

Figure 3-26 - Laser welding of zinc coated steels to tubular hydroformed parts.L-3

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-20

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.B.4. Arc Welding Uncoated Steels – Fusion Conventional arc welding (for example GMAW, TIG, and plasma) can be used for AHSS in a similar way to Mild steels. The same shielding gases can be used for both AHSS and Mild steels. Despite the increased alloying content used for AHSS, there are no increased welding imperfections compared with Mild steel arc welds. The strength of the welds for AHSS increases with increasing base metal strength and decreasing heat input. Depending on the chemical composition of very high strength AHSS (for example MS and DP steels with high martensite content and strength levels in excess of 800 MPa), the strength of the weld joint may be reduced in comparison to the base metal strength due to small soft zones in HAZ (Figure 3-27). For AHSS of the type CP and TRIP, no soft zones occur in HAZ due to the higher alloying content for these steels in comparison to DP and MS steels.

Figure 3-27 – Relationship between martensite content and reduction in true ultimate tensile strength. Data obtained by Gleeble simulation of high heat input GMAW HAZ.D-1

Higher strength filler wires are recommended for welding of AHSS grades with strength levels higher than 800 MPa (Figure 3-28 for single-sided welded lap joint and Figure 3-29 for butt joints). It should be noted that higher strength fillers are more expensive and, more importantly, less tolerant to the presence of any weld imperfections. When welding AHSS to lower strength or Mild steel, it is recommended that filler wire with 70 Ksi (482 MPa) strength be used. Single-sided welded lap joints are normally used in the automotive industry. Due to the unsymmetrical loading and the extra bending moment associated with this type of joint, the strength of this lap joint is lower than that of the butt joint.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-21

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Figure 3-28 - Influence of filler metal strength in arc welding of DP and MS. Tensile strength is 560 MPa for low strength and 890 MPa for high strength fillers. Fracture position in HAZ for all cases except DP 700/1000 and MS 1200/1400 combination with low strength filler where fracture occurred in weld metal. Tensile strength equals peak load divided by cross-sectional area of sample.C-3

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Figure 3-29 - Influence of filler metal strength in GMAW (butt) welding on weld strength for MS steel. Filler metal tensile strength range is 510-950 MPa.B-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-22

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Arc welds are normally used in local areas of vehicles where the loads are high. As required with all GMAW of any grade of steel, care should be taken to control heat input and the resulting weld metallurgy. The length of the GMA welds is often quite short. The reduction in strength for some of the AHSS GMA welds, in comparison to base metal, can be compensated by increasing the length of the weld. By adjusting the number and length (that is the total joined area) of welds, the fatigue strength of the joint can be improved. The fatigue strength of an arc welded joint, in general, tends to be better than that of a spot welded joint (Figure 3-30).

Figure 3-30 - Fatigue strength of GMAW welded DP 340/600 compared to spot welding.L-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-23

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.C. Brazing Brazing can be used to join zinc-coated AHSS. Today there are many commercial grades of arc braze materials that can be used for AHSS without any additional corrosion issues. The most common braze material is SG-CuSi3 (Table 3-3) mainly due to the wide melting range, which reduces the risk for imperfections during the brazing. To increase joint strength, braze materials with a higher amount of alloying elements are available at higher costs.

Table 3-3 - Properties for the braze material SG-CuSi3 used in brazing.T-3

Results from tensile-shear testing and peel testing of the braze material SG-CuSi3 (Figure 3-31) show that the brazed joint strength for SG-CuSi3 is somewhat lower than the base metal, except for DP 340/600 in tensile peel condition.

Figure 3-31 - Tensile shear (fillet weld on lap joint) and tensile peel tests (flange weld) for the braze material SG-CuSi3 of DP 340/600 (1.0 mm), TRIP 400/700 (1.0 mm) and CP 680/800 (1.5 mm). Shielding gas: Argon.T-3

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-24

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.D. Adhesive Bonding The bond strength of an adhesive is constant, and in design applications, is proportional to the area covered by the adhesive. The adhesive joint strength will be unchanged and analysis of the joint should be comprehensive. In general, the use of AHSS with high-strength structural adhesives will result in higher bond strength than for Mild steel if the same sheet thickness is applied (Figure 3-32). Reduction of sheet thickness will decrease the strength because more peel load will occur. The true mechanical load in the component part must be considered. If higher joint strengths are needed, the overlapped area may be enlarged. Adhesives with even higher strength are under development.

Figure 3-32 - The effect of material strength on bond strength. W is the integral of the force/elongation curve.B-2

Joining of AHSS with adhesive bonding is a good method to improve stiffness and fatigue strength in comparison to other joining methods (spot welding, mechanical joining, arc welding, and laser welding). Due to the larger bonding area with adhesive bonding, the local stresses can be reduced and therefore the fatigue strength is increased. These improvements in stiffness and fatigue strength are important factors to consider at the design stage, especially in those cases when AHSS is used to decrease the weight of a component.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-25

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.E. Mechanical Joining Examples of mechanical joining are clinching and rivets. A schematic drawing of a mechanical joining system is shown in Figure 3-33. A simple round punch presses the materials to be joined into the die cavity. As the force continues to increase, the punch side material is forced to spread outwards within the die side material.

Figure 3-33 - Schematic drawing of a clinching system.T-4 This creates an aesthetically round button, which joins cleanly without any burrs or sharp edges that can corrode. Even with galvanized or aluminized sheet metals, the anti-corrosive properties remain intact as the protective layer flows with the material. Table 3-4 shows characteristics of different mechanical joining methods. Table 3-4 - The characteristics of mechanical joining systems.N-1

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-26

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

In a recent study conducted to assess the feasibility of clinch joining advanced high strength steels T-8, it was concluded that 780 MPa dual phase and TRIP steels can be joined to themselves and to low-carbon steel (See Fig 3-34). However, 980 dual phase steel showed tears when placed on the die side (Figure 3-35). These cracks were found at the ferrite-martensite boundaries (Figure 3-36). However, these tears did not appear to affect the joint strength. More work is needed to improve the local formability of 980 MPa tensile strength dual phase steel for successful clinch joining.

Figure 3-34 - Cross-sections of successful clinch joints in 780 MPa tensile strength TRIP (left) and DP (right) steels.

Figure 3-35 - Plan view (left) and cross sectional view of a clinch joint from 980 MPa tensile strength DP steel showing tears on the die side.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Figure 3-36 - Scanning electron microscope views of tears found in 980 MPa tensile strength DP steel clinch joints.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-27

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Circular clinching without cutting and self-piercing riveting (existing half-hollow-rivets) are not recommended for materials with less than 40% hole expansion ratio as shown in Figure 3-37. Clinching with partial cutting may be applied instead.

Figure 3-37 - Balance between elongation and stretch flangeability of 980 MPa tensile strength class AHSS and surface appearance of mechanical joint at the back side.N-1 Warm clinching and riveting are under investigation for material with less than 12 percent total elongation. As with any steel, equipment size and clinch/pierce force are proportional to the material strength and tool life is inversely proportional to material strength. The strength of self-piercing riveted AHSS is higher than for Mild steels. Figure 3-38 shows an example of a self piercing rivet joining two sheets of 1.5 mm thick DP 300/500. AHSS with tensile strengths greater than 900 MPa cannot be self-piercing riveted by conventional methods today.

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Figure 3-38 - Example of DP 300/500 with a self-piercing rivet.G-2

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-28

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.F. Hybrid Joining As with mild steels, AHSS-hybrid joints can be made by combining adhesive bonding with resistance spot welding, clinching, or self-piercing riveting. These hybrid joints result in higher strength values (static, fatigue, and crash) than the spot welding alone (Figure 3-39). If local deformation and buckling can be avoided during in-service applications of weldbonding/adhesive hybrid joining, the potential for component performance is enhanced.

Figure 3-39 - Comparison of bearing capacity for single and hybrid joints.B-3

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-29

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

3.G. Material Issues For Field Weld Repair and Replacement The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), in cooperation with North American OEMs, has undertaken studies to understand the influences of “in field” repair practices on some AHSS.A-5 Studies have been completed for DP, MS, and TRIP steels. In particular, the effects of Gas Metal Arc (GMA) welding and a practice called “flame straightening” were examined. Test results indicate that GMA welding is acceptable as a repair method for AHSS - including DP, MS, and TRIP. Mechanical properties were within the expected range for each material in close proximity to the repair weld and, therefore, were considered acceptable. Flame straightening consists of heating a portion of the body or frame structure that has been deformed in a collision to 650 ºC (dull cherry red) for 90 seconds and then pulling the deformed portion of the structure to its original position. This heating cycle then could be applied twice. Test results indicated that “flame straightening” should NOT be used to repair AHSS such as DP, MS, and TRIP. The heating cycle was found to cause degradation of the mechanical properties of as-formed (work hardened) body parts. Therefore, repair of AHSS parts using GMAW in the field may be acceptable. In any event, the OEM’s specific recommendations for the material and vehicle should be followed.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 3-30

ADV APPLICATION AD VANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICA TION GUIDELINES

Section 3 - Joining

Version

4.1

Section 4 Glossar y

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Section 4 - Glossary This glossary was developed jointly by WorldAutoSteel and the Auto/Steel Partnership (A/SP).

AHSS (Advanced High-Strength Steel): A series of high-strength steels containing microstructural phases other than ferrite and pearlite. These other phases include martensite, bainite, retained austenite, and/or austenite in quantities sufficient to produce unique mechanical properties. Most AHSS have a multi-phase microstructure. AKDQ (Aluminium-Killed Draw-Quality steel): A highly formable grade of mild steel that is usually aluminum deoxidized and commonly used around the world for a large number of sheet metal stampings. See Mild Steel. Angular change: Springback resulting from a change in sheet metal curvature at the punch radius. The springback angle describes the resulting change in flange position. Anisotropy: Variations in one or more physical or mechanical properties with direction. Normal anisotropy – A condition where a property in the sheet thickness direction differs in magnitude from the same property in the plane of the sheet. The common measurement is rm or the mean r-value of plastic strain ratios taken at 0º, 45º, 90º, and 135º to the coil rolling direction. Planar anisotropy – A condition where a property varies with direction in the plane of the sheet. The planar variation in plastic strain ratio ( r) indicates the tendency of the sheet metal to ear during deep drawing. Plastic strain ratio – A measure of plastic anisotropy (r) defined by the ratio of the true width strain to the true thickness strain in a tensile test. Austenite: A face-centered cubic crystalline phase, also known as gamma ( ). At room temperature, it is a feebly magnetic homogenous phase consisting of a solid solution of no more than 2% carbon and significant amounts of manganese and/or nickel. It has an inherently high n-value and high elongation, therefore providing improved formability over other crystalline structures of comparable strength. It is the primary phase of steel at elevated temperatures after solidification prior to cooling, but is not present in conventional steels at room temperature. With proper alloying, high temperature austenite can be rapidly quenched to produce martensite. Retained austenite - Austenite present in the microstructure at room temperature resulting from proper chemistry and heat-treating. With sufficient subsequent cold work, this retained austenite can transform into martensite. Bainite: A mixture of -iron and very fine carbides that has a needle-like structure and is produced by transformation of austenite. Replacing the ferrite with bainite helps strengthen the steel. Bake hardening index: The change in yield strength created in a tensile test sample given a 2% stretch and then followed by a typical automotive paint bake cycle. BH (Bake Hardening steel): A low carbon, cold formable sheet steel that achieves an increase in strength after forming due to a combination of straining and age hardening. Increasing the temperature accelerates the aging-hardening process.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 4-1

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Batch (box) annealed steel: A large stationary mass of cold worked steel coils heated and slowly cooled within the surrounding furnace to return the steel microstructure to a more formable condition and desired size of undeformed grains. Binder: The upper and lower holding surfaces that control sheet metal flow into the draw die cavity and prevent wrinkling. Often, the terms blankholder or holddown are used. Blank: A pre-cut sheet metal shape ready for a stamping press operation. Developed blank - A flat sheet steel blank with a profile that produces a finished part with a minimum of trimming operations. Blank cutting dies produce this type of blank for form dies. Rough blank - A flat sheet steel blank with a rectangular, trapezoidal, or chevron periphery. Shear lines or cutoff dies produce these blanks for draw die or stretch-form die applications. Blankholder: The part of the draw die’s binder that has pressure adjustment. Other names are binder or holddown. Programmable blankholder - A blankholder actuated by a press or die cushion programmed to vary the pressure profile during the draw die process. AHSS stampings can often benefit from a variable cushion pressure profile during the press stroke. Burr: The rough, sharp protrusion above the surface of a stamped, pierced, or slit edge of metal which is exacerbated by worn trim steels or improper die or knife clearance. Although unavoidable in metal cutting except with fine blanking, it should be minimized due to problems it causes with edge stretching & forming, handling, and contact issues. Carbide (Iron Carbide): A hard iron-carbon phase (FE3C) that is formed during solidification (primary carbides) or during cooling (cementite). Carbon Equivalent: The amount of carbon, manganese, chromium, molybdenum, nitrogen and other elements that have the same effect on a steel’s weldability as a steel containing carbon without these elements using various carbon equivalent prediction formulas. CM (Carbon Manganese steel): High-strength steels with strength increased primarily by solid solution strengthening. Clinching: Mechanical joining operation where the punch forces two sheets of metal to spread outward in the die and interlock. CP (Complex Phase steel): Steel with a very fine microstructure of ferrite and higher volume fractions of hard phases and further strengthened by fine precipitates. Computerized forming simulation: More accurately titled as computerized forming-process development, computerized die tryout, or virtual sheet metal forming. Forming the virtual stamping in the computer provides validation of product, process, and die design information before beginning construction of hard tooling. Applications include determination whether the initial product design can be formed, evaluation of various product and process design options, and acquisition of additional production requirements, such as maximum required press load and blank size/shape. Continuous annealed steel: Steel that is unwrapped as it is pulled through a long continuous furnace and then through a cooling or quench region to recrystallize the microstructure and obtain the desired physical properties. The alternative annealing method is batch annealing. Also can be used for transformation strengthening (martensite formation).

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 4-2

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 4 - Glossary

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Cup drawing: A press forming operation in which a sheet metal blank (usually circular) forms a cup shaped part (often cylindrical). Curl (sidewall): Springback resulting from metal bending and unbending over a radius and/or drawbead. Curl is characterized by an average radius of curvature. Die clearance: The gap or distance between the die surfaces as the press is in operation. Double action press: A press with inner and outer slides to activate draw dies. Usually, the outer slide drives the blankholder and the inner slide drives the punch. Draw bead: A small ridge of metal on the blankholder to restrain the flow of sheet steel into the die cavity. Active draw bead - Draw beads that are separate from the binder. They are usually below the surface of the binder at the beginning of the press stroke and are mechanically lifted near the bottom of the press stroke to increase restraint of the sheet metal flow off the binder. Square lock bead - A small, square-shaped ridge of metal on the blankholder to prevent metal flow off the binder in stretch-form dies. Draw development: The process of developing a die-setup for the stamping (including the flange trim angles, addendum sheet metal, and binder surfaces) to design a draw die and subsequent trim die operation. Draw die: A die in which sheet metal circumferentially compresses (minor axis) on the binder and radially elongates (major axis) when pulled off the binder and into the die cavity by the punch. Most automotive body draw die stampings will have circumferential compression located primarily in the corners of the stamping. Draw stampings for parts such as cups and cans will have circumferential compression around the entire punch line. Automotive body panel draw die processes normally require a rough blank, draw beads on the binder, and subsequent trim die operations to remove the binder offal. The term is also used colloquially to identify the first die in a multiple stage forming process used to produce a stamped part. Cushion draw die - A draw operation performed in a single-action press with blankholder force supplied by an air, nitrogen, or hydraulic pressure cushion. Double action draw die - A draw die actuated by a double action press that has separate slides to drive the die punch and blankholder. DQSK (Draw-Quality Special-Killed steel): A highly formable grade of mild steel that is usually aluminum deoxidized. Also called Aluminium-Killed Draw-Quality (AKDQ) steel. See Mild Steel. DP (Dual Phase steel): Steel consisting of a ferrite matrix containing a hard second phase, usually islands of martensite. Elastic deformation: Deformation that will return to its original shape and dimensions upon removal of the load or stress. Elastic limit: The maximum stress to which a material may be subjected and yet return to its original shape and dimensions upon removal of the stress. Elastic recovery: The reaction of sheet metal to the release of elastic and residual stresses. The reaction increases as the strength of the steel increases.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 4-3

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 4 - Glossary

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Elongation: The amount of permanent plastic deformation in a tensile test or any segment of a sheet metal stamping. Local elongation: The percent of permanent stretch deformation in a localized area over a very short gauge length. It is highly affected by the material microstructure. Local elongation is commonly measured by a conical hole expansion test and expressed as a percentage increase ( ) in hole diameter. Total elongation - A measure of ductility obtained from a tensile test. Values are the final gage length minus original gage length divided by the original gage length and then changed to percent. Different regions of the world use different gauge lengths and specimen widths. Uniform elongation - A measure of ductility obtained from a tensile test. Values are the gage length at maximum load (UTS) minus original gage length divided by the original gage length and then changed to percent. Embossing: Forming or displacing a section of metal without metal flow from surrounding sheet metal. Engineering strain: The percent unit elongation obtained by the change in length divided by the original length. Engineering stress: The unit force obtained when dividing the applied load by the original cross-sectional area. Erichsen test: A spherical punch test that deforms a piece of sheet metal, restrained except at the centre, until fracture occurs. The height of the cup at fracture is a measure of ductility. This test is similar to the Olsen test. Ferrite ( ): A body-centered cubic crystalline phase of steel. It is the microstructure of pure iron, and can have this lattice structure with up to .022%% carbon in solid solution. FB (Ferritic-Bainitic steel): Steel with a microstructure containing ferrite and bainite. The bainite provides strength and replaces the islands of martensite in DP and TRIP steels to provide improved edge stretchability. Filler metal: Metal added during arc welding that is available in the form of rods, spooled wire, or consumable inserts. Form die: A die process capable of producing part surface contours as well as peripheral flanges. Usually, a developed blank is used which reduces or eliminates the need for subsequent trim die operations. Draw-action form die - A form die in which an external pressure pad (similar to a binder) controls compression and buckles on flanges during the deformation process. This type of die normally utilizes a developed blank, which eliminates the need for a following trim die operation. Draw beads are not used. Open-end form die - A die process similar to a draw die, but with little or no compression of the sheet metal due to the absence of closed corners at the ends of the stamping. A rough blank is used and a subsequent trim die operation is necessary, similar to that required for the draw die process. Draw beads often are used. Rails and channel shaped parts frequently are stamped this way. Post-stretch form die - A form die with the sheet metal stamping locked out and stretched over the post or punch shortly before the press reaches bottom dead centre. This post-stretch reduces residual stresses that cause springback and other distortions in HSS stampings.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 4-4

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 4 - Glossary

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Stretch-form die - A die similar to a draw die with the sheet metal restrained by lock beads on the binder surface. A rough blank is used. The sheet undergoes biaxial stretch to form the part. Subsequent trim die operations are required to remove the lock beads. FLC (Forming Limit Curve): An empirical curve showing the different combinations of biaxial strain levels beyond which failure (local necking) may occur in sheet metal forming. The strains are given in terms of major and minor strains measured from ellipses previously imprinted as circles on the undeformed sheet metal. GMAW (Gas Metal Arc Welding): An arc welding process that uses a continuously fed consumable electrode and a shielding gas. Common GMAW processes are MIG (metal inert gas) welding and MAG (metal active gas) welding. HAZ (Heat Affected Zone): The zone adjacent to the weld fusion zone where heat generated by the welding process changes base metal properties and grain size. Heat balance: The phenomenon in resistance spot welding of balancing the heat input during the weld based on the gauge and grade of steel. HHE (High Hole Expansion steel): A specific customer application requirement to improve local elongation for hole expansion and stretch flanging operations. A variety of special steel types may meet these specific specifications. HSLA (High-Strength, Low-Alloy steel): Steels that generally contain microalloying elements such as titanium, vanadium, or niobium to increase strength by grain size control, precipitation hardening, and solid solution hardening. HSS (High-Strength steel): Any steel product with initial yield strength greater than 210 MPa or a tensile strength greater than 270 MPa. HET (Hole expansion test): A formability test in which a tapered (usually conical) punch is forced through a punched or drilled and reamed hole forcing the metal in the periphery of the hole to expand in a stretching mode until fracture occurs. HF (Hot-Formed steel): A quenchable steel that is heated to transform the microstructure to austenite and then immediately hot-formed and in-die quenched. Final microstructure is martensite. HF steel provides a combination of good formability, high tensile strength, and no springback issues. Most common HF steels are boron based. Hybrid joining: Combining adhesive bonding with resistance spot welding, clinching or self-piercing rivets to increase joint strength. IF (Interstitial-Free steel): Steel produced with very low amounts of interstitial elements (primarily carbon and nitrogen) with small amounts of titanium or niobium added to tie up the remaining interstitial atoms. Without free interstitial elements, these steels are very ductile and soft, will not age or bake harden, and will not form strain (Lüder’s) lines during forming due to the absence of YPE (yield point elongation). IS (Isotropic steel): A ferritic type of microstructure modified so the minimize any earing tendencies.

r value is approximately zero to

K-value: Determined from the plot of log true stress versus log true strain, K is the value of true stress at a true strain of 1.0. The K-value is an important term in the power law equation .

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 4-5

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 4 - Glossary

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

ksi: An English unit of measure for thousands of pounds per square inch. One ksi = 6.895 MPa. MPa and ksi are units of measure for stress in materials and pressure in fluids. Limiting Draw Ratio (LDR): An expression of drawability given by the highest drawing ratio (blank diameter divided by punch diameter) without cup failure. The Swift cup test often is the required series of tests utilized to measure the LDR. Major strain: Largest positive strain at a given point in the sheet surface measured from a circle grid. The major strain is the longest axis of the ellipse. The press shop term often is major stretch. MS (Martensitic steel): A body-centered tetragonal crystalline phase of steel. It is the primary strengthening phase in Dual Phase steels and Martensitic steels are 100% martensite. It is a hard phase that can form during the quenching of steels with sufficient carbon equivalents. Martensite can also be formed by the work hardening of austenite. MPa (Mega Pascal): A metric measure of stress in materials and pressure in fluids. One MPa = 0.145 ksi. MAG (Metal Active Gas): See Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW). Metal gainer: A preformed area of the stamping that temporarily stores surplus material which is subsequently used to feed metal into an area that normally would be highly stretched and torn. Alternatively, the term is used to describe a post-forming operation where surplus material is permanently stored in stamped shapes to prevent buckles. MIG (Metal Inert Gas): - See Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW). Microstructure: The contrast observed under a microscope when a flat ground surface is highly polished, and then thermally or chemically etched. The contrast results from the presence of grain boundaries and different phases, all of which respond differently to the etchant. A photomicrograph is a picture of the resulting microstructure. MFDC (Mid-Frequency Direct Current): MFDC has the advantage of both unidirectional and continuous current. Mild steel: Low strength steels with essentially a ferritic microstructure and some strengthening techniques. Drawing Quality (DQ) and Aluminium-Killed Draw-Quality (AKDQ) steels are examples and often serve as a reference base because of their widespread application and production volume. Other specifications use Drawing Steel (DS), Forming Steel (FS), and similar terms. Minor strain: The least strain at a given point in the sheet surface and always perpendicular to the major strain. In a circle grid, the minor strain is the shortest axis of the ellipse. The press shop term often is minor stretch. MP (Multi-phase steel): See AHSS (Advanced High Strength Steels). Multiple stage forming: Forming a stamping in more than one die or one operation. Secondary forming stages can be redraw, ironing, restrike, flanging, trimming, hole expansion, and many other operations.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 4-6

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 4 - Glossary

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

n-value: The work hardening exponent derived from the relationship between true stress and true strain. The n-value is a measure of stretchability. See work hardening exponent. Instantaneous n-value - The n-value at any specific value of strain. For some AHSS and other steels, the n-value changes with strain. For these steels, a plot of log true stress versus log true strain allows measurement of the slope of the curve at each point of strain. These slope measurements provide the n-value as a function of strain. Terminal n-value - The n-value at the end of uniform elongation, which is a parameter influencing the height of the forming limit curve. In the absence of an instantaneous n-value curve, the n-value between 10% elongation and ultimate tensile strength (maximum load) from a tensile test can be used as a good estimate of terminal n-value. Necking: A highly localized reduction in one or more dimensions in a tensile test or stamping. Diffuse necking - A localized width neck occurring in tensile test specimens that creates the maximum load identified as the ultimate tensile strength (UTS). Local necking - A through-thickness neck that defines the forming limit curve and termination of useful forming in the remainder of the stamping. No deformation takes place along the neck. Further deformation within the local neck leads to rapid ductile fracture. Overbend: Increasing the angle of bend beyond the part requirement in a forming process to compensate for springback. Over/Undercrown: A type of springback affecting the longitudinal camber of stampings such as rails and beams. Pearlite: A lamellar mixture or combination of ferrite and carbide. Plastic deformation: The permanent deformation of a material caused by straining (stretch, draw, bend, coin, etc.) past its elastic limit. Post-annealing: An annealing cycle given to a stamping or portion of the stamping to recrystallize the microstructure and improve the properties for additional forming operations or in-service requirements. PFHT (Post-Formed Heat-Treatable steel): Heating and quenching formed stampings off-line in fixtures to obtain higher strengths. A broad category of steels having various chemistries is applicable for this process. Post-stretch: A stretch process added near the end of the forming stroke to reduce sidewall curl and/or angular change resulting from the stamping process. Active lock beads, lock steps, or other blank locking methods prevent metal flow from the binder to generate a minimum of 2% additional sidewall stretch at the end of the press stroke. Process capability: The variation of key dimensions of parts produced from a die process compared to the part tolerances. Process variation: Two components make up process variation. One is the variation caused by differences in run-to-run press and die setups. The second is the part-to-part variation within the same run caused by process variables such as lubrication, cushion pressures, die temperatures, non-uniform material, etc. Punchline: The line between the draw die binder and the draw die punch in the plan view of the die drawing.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 4-7

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 4 - Glossary

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Quasi-static: Traditionally the strain rate during a tensile test, which is very slow compared to deformation rates during sheet metal forming or a crash event. Residual stresses: Elastic stresses that remain in the stamping upon removal of the forming load. Residual stresses are trapped stresses because the final geometry of the stamping does not allow complete release of all elastic stresses. Restrike die: A secondary forming operation designed to improve part dimensional control by sharpening radii, correcting springback, or incorporation of other process features. Sheared edge stretchability: Reduced residual stretchability of as-sheared edges due to the high concentration of cold work, work hardening, crack initiators, and pre-cracking at the sheared interface. Shrink flanging: A bending operation in which a narrow strip at the edge of a sheet is bent down (or up) along a curved line that creates shrinking (compression) along the length of the flange. Sidewall curl: Springback resulting from metal moving over a radius or through draw beads. Curl is characterized by an average radius of curvature. Simulative formability tests: These tests provide very specific formability information that is significantly dependent on deformation mode, tooling geometry, lubrication conditions, and material behaviour. Examples include hemispherical dome tests, cup tests, flanging tests, and other focused areas of formability. Single action press: A press with a single slide to activate the die. Springback: The extent to which metal in the stamping deviates from the designed or intended shape after undergoing a forming operation. Also the angular amount a metal returns toward its former position after being bent a specified amount. Strain gradient: A change in strain along a line in a stamping. Some changes can be very severe and highly localized and will have an accompanying increase in thickness strain. Strain rate: The amount of strain per unit of time. Used in this document to define deformation rate in tensile tests, forming operations, and crash events. SF (Stretch Flangeable steel): A specific customer application requirement to improve local elongation for hole expansion and stretch flanging operations. A variety of special steel types may meet these specific specifications. Stretch flanging: A bending operation in which a narrow strip at the edge of a sheet is bent down (or up) along a curved line that creates stretching (tension) along the length of the flange. Tempering pulse: A post-weld heat treatment or post-annealing to improve the weld fracture mode and the weld current range. TS (Tensile Strength): Also called the ultimate tensile strength (UTS). In a tensile test, the tensile strength is the maximum load divided by the original cross-sectional area. TRIP (Transformation-Induced Plasticity steel): A steel with a microstructure of retained austenite embedded in a primary matrix of ferrite. In addition, hard phases of martensite and bainite are present in varying amounts. The retained austenite progressively transforms to martensite with increasing strain. True strain: The unit elongation given by the change in length divided by the instantaneous gage length.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 4-8

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 4 - Glossary

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

True stress: The unit force obtained from the applied load divided by the instantaneous cross-sectional area. TWIP (Twinning-Induced Plasticity steel): A high manganese steel that is austenitic at all temperatures – especially room temperature. The twinning mode of deformation creates a very high n-value, a tensile strength in excess of 900 MPa, and a total elongation in excess of 40%. Twist: Twist in a channel defined as two cross-sections rotating differently along their axis. UTS (Ultimate Tensile Strength): See Tensile Strength. UFG (Ultra fine grain steel): Hot-rolled, higher strength steel designed to avoid low values of blanked edge stretchability by replacing islands of martensite with an ultra-fine grain size. An array of very fine particles can provide additional strength without reduction of edge stretchability. ULSAB-AVC (UltraLight Steel Auto Body – Advanced Vehicle Concepts): Information is available at www.worldautosteel.org. ULSAC (UltraLight Steel Auto Closures): Information is available at www.worldautosteel.org. Work hardening exponent: The exponent in the relationship is the true strain. See n-value. constant, and

where

is the true stress, K is a

YS (Yield Strength): The stress at which steel exhibits a specified deviation (usually 0.2% offset) from the proportionality of stress to strain and signals the onset of plastic deformation.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 4-9

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 4 - Glossary

Version

4.1

Section 5 References

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Section 5 - References

A-1. Body Systems Analysis Team, “Automotive Sheet Steel Stamping Process Variation,” Auto/Steel Partnership (Summer 1999) www.a-sp.org. A-2. High Strength Steel (HSS) Stamping Design Manual, Auto/Steel Partnership (2000). A-3. High Strength Steel (HSS) Stamping Design Manual, Auto/Steel Partnership (1997). A-4. Courtesy of M. Munier, Arcelor. A-5. American Iron and Steel Institute, “Advanced High-Strength Steel Repairability Studies: Phase I Final Report and Phase II Final Report,” www.autosteel.org. A-6. Auto/Steel Partnership, “Advanced High Strength Steel Guidelines,” www.a-sp.org (November 1, 2007). A-7. American Iron and Steel Institute, Great Designs in Steel, Seminar Presentation. B-1. H. Beenken, “Joining of AHSS versus Mild Steel,” Processing State-of-the-Art Multi-phase Steel; European Automotive Supplier Conference, Berlin (September 23, 2004). B-2. H. Beenken et al, “Verarbeitung Oberflächenveredelter Stahlfeinbleche mit Verschiedenen Fügetechniken,” Große Schweißtechnische Tagung 2000, Nürnberg, (September 27, 2000). DVS-Berichte Bd. 209, Schweißen und Schneiden (2000). B-3. H. Beenken, “Hochfeste Stahlwerkstoffe und ihre Weiterverarbeitung im Rohbau,” Fügetechnologien im Automobilleichtbau, AUTOMOBIL Produktion, Stuttgart, (March 20, 2002). C-1. B. Carlsson et al, “Formability of High Strength Dual Phase Steels,” Paper F2004F454, SSAB Tunnplåt AB, Borlänge, Sweden (2004). C-2. B. Carlsson, “Choice of Tool Materials for Punching and Forming of Extra- and Ultra High Strength Steel Sheet,” 3rd International Conference and Exhibition on Design and Production of Dies and Molds and 7th International Symposium on Advances in Abrasive Technology, Bursa, Turkey (June 17-19, 2004). C-3. V. Cuddy et al, “Manufacturing Guidelines When Using Ultra High Strength Steels in Automotive Applications,” EU Report (ECSC) R585 (January 2004). C-4. D. Corjette et al, “Ultra High Strength FeMn TWIP Steels for Automotive Safety Parts,” SAE Paper 2005-01-1327 (2005). D-1. Courtesy of A. Lee, Dofasco Inc. F-1. T. Flehmig et al, “A New Method of Manufacturing Hollow Sections for Hydroformed Body Components,” International Body Engineering Conference, Detroit, USA (2000). F-2. T. Flehmig et al, “Thin Walled Steel Tube Pre-bending for Hydroformed Component – Bending Boundaries and Presentation of a New Mandrel Design,” SAE Paper 2001-01-0642, Detroit, USA (2001).

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 5-1

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

G-1. J. Gerlach et al, “Material Aspects of Tube-hydroforming,” SAE Paper 1999-01-3204, Detroit, USA (1999). G-2. S. Göklü, “Innovative Fügetechnologien beim Einsatz Neuartiger Stahlwerkstoffe für den Schienenfahrzeugbau,” Fügen und Konstruieren im Schienenfahrzeugbau, SLV Halle, (May 21, 1997). G-3. S. Göklü et al, “The Influence of Corrosion on the Fatigue Strength of Joined Components from Coated Steel Plate,” Materials and Corrosion 50, p.1 (1999). H-1. R. Hilsen et al, “Stamping Potential of Hot-Rolled, Columbium-Bearing High-Strength Steels,” Proceedings of Microalloying 75 (1977). H-2. B. Högman et al, “Blanking in Docol Ultra High Strength Steels,” Verschleißschutztechnik, Schopfheim, Germany (2004) and G. Hartmann “Blanking and Shearing of AHS Steels – Quality Aspects of Sheared Edges and Prediction of Cutting Forces,” ACI Conference; Processing State-of-the Art Multiphase Steels, Berlin, Germany (2004). H-3. G. Hartmann, “Das Spektrum Moderner Stahlfeinbleche-Festigkeiten und Auswirkungen auf die Umformung” Verschleißschutztechnik, Schopfheim, Germany (2004). I-1. R. Mohan Iyengar et al, “Implications of Hot-Stamped Boron Steel Components in Automotive Structures,” SAE Paper 2008-01-0857 (2008). K-1. A. Konieczny, “Advanced High Strength Steels – Formability,” 2003 Great Designs in Steel, American Iron and Steel Institute (February 19, 2003), www.autosteel.org. K-2. S. Keeler, “Increased Use of Higher Strength Steels,” PMA Metalforming magazine (July 2002). K-3. A. Konieczny, “On the Formability of Automotive TRIP Steels”, SAE Technical Paper No. 2003-01-0521 (2003). K-4. T. Katayama et al, “Effects of Material Properties on Shape-Fixability and Shape Control Techniques in Hat-shaped Forming,” Proceedings of the 22nd IDDRG Congress, p.97 (2002). K-5. Y. Kuriyama, “The Latest Trends in Both Development of High Tensile Strength Steels and Press Forming Technologies for Automotive Parts,” NMS (Nishiyama Memorial Seminar), ISIJ, 175/176, p.1 (2001). K-6. A. Konieczny and T. Henderson, “On Formability Limitations in Stamping Involving Sheared Edge Stretching,” SAE Paper 2007-01-0340 (2007). L-1. S-D. Liu, “ASP HSS Load Beam Springback Measurement Data Analysis,” Generalety Project Report #001023 (May 27, 2004). L-2. S. Lalam, B. Yan, “Weldability of AHSS,” Society of Automotive Engineers, International Congress, Detroit (2004). L-3. R. Laurenz, “Bauteilangepasste Fügetechnologien,” Fügetechnologien im Automobilbau, Ulm (February 11, 2004). L-4. R. Laurenz, “Spot Weldability of Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS),” Conference on Advanced Joining, IUC, Olofstrøm (February 2, 2004).

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 5-2

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 5 - References

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

L-5. F. Lu and M. Forrester, Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Applications of Lasers and Electro Optics (2002). L-6: T. M. Link, “Tensile Shear Spot Weld Fatigue of Advanced High Strength Steels,” Paper presented at the 45th MWSP Conference, Page 345, Vol. XLI (2003). L-7. W. Li and E, Feng, “Energy Consumption in AC and MFDC Resistance Spot Welding” paper presented at the XI Sheet Metal Welding Conference, American Welding Society, Detroit Chapter (May 11-14, 2004). M-1. Courtesy of S. Lalam, Mittal Steel. M-2. M. Merklein and J. Lechler, “Determination of Material and Process Characteristics for Hot Stamping Processes of Quenchable Ultra High Strength Steels with Respect to a FE-based Process Design,” SAE Paper 2008-01-0853 (2008). N-1. Courtesy of K. Yamazaki, Nippon Steel Corporation. N-2. M. F. Shi, Internal National Steel Corporation report. N-3. J. Noel, HSS Stamping Task Force, Auto/Steel Partnership. P-1. C. Potter, American Iron and Steel Institute, Southfield, MI P-2. Courtesy of Posco, South Korea R-1. Courtesy of P. Ritakallio, Rautaruukki Oyj. R-2: D. J. Radakovic and M. Tumuluru, “Predicting Resistance Spot Weld Fatigue Failure Modes in Shear Tension Tests of Advanced High Strength Automotive Steels,” Welding Journal, Vol. 87 (April 2008). S-1. M. Shi et al, “Formability Performance Comparison between Dual Phase and HSLA Steels,” Proceedings of 43rd Mechanical Working and Steel Processing, Iron & Steel Society, 39, p.165 (2001). S-2. M. Shi, “Springback and Springback Variation Design Guidelines and Literature Review,” National Steel Corporation Internal Report (1994). S-3. S. Sadagopan and D. Urban, “Formability Characterization of a New Generation of High Strength Steels,” American Iron and Steel Institute (March 2003). S-4. Singh et al, “Selecting the Optimum Joining Technology,” p.323 and “Increasing the Relevance of Fatigue Test Results,” MP Materialprüfung, 45, 7-8, p.330 (2003). S-5. Courtesy of D. Eriksson, SSAB Tunnplåt AB. T-1. M. Takahashi et al, “High Strength Hot-Rolled Steel Sheets for Automobiles,” Nippon Steel Technical Report No. 88 (July 2003). T-2. M. Takahashi, “Development of High Strength Steels for Automobiles,” Nippon Steel Technical Report No. 88 (July 2003). T-3. Courtesy of ThyssenKrupp Stahl. T-4. Courtesy of TOX PRESSOTECHNIK GmbH & Co. KG, Weingarten.

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 5-3

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 5 - References

Version

4.1

Revised: 15 Mar 2009

T-5. M. Tumuluru, “Resistance Spot Welding of Coated High-Strength Dual-Phase Steels,“ Welding Journal (August 2006). T-6. M. Tumuluru, “A Comparative Examination of the Resistance Spot Welding Behavior of Two Advanced High Strength Steels,” SAE Paper 2006-01-1214 (2006). T-7: M. Tumuluru, “The Effect of Coatings on the Resistance Spot Welding Behavior of 780 MPa Dual Phase Steel ”, Welding Journal, Vol. 86 (June 2007). T-8: M. Tumuluru and S. Gnade, “Clinch Joining of Advanced High Strength Steels,” Paper presented at the MS&T Conference, Detroit, MI (September 2007). U-1. M. Ueda and K. Ueno, “A Study of Springback in the Stretch Bending of Channels,” Journal of Mechanical Working Technology, 5, p.163 (1981). V-1. Courtesy of C. Walch, voestalpine Stahl GmbH. V-2. Courtesy of M. Peruzzi, voestalpine Stahl GmbH. W-1. International Iron and Steel Institute, UltraLight Steel Auto Body - Advanced Vehicle Concepts (ULSAB– AVC) Overview Report (2002), www.worldautosteel.org. W-2. www.worldautosteel.org. W-3. J. Wu et al, “A Failure Criterion for Stretch Bendability of Advanced High Strength Steels,” SAE Paper 2006-01-0349 (2006). W-4. M. Walp et al, “Shear Fracture in Advanced High Strength Steels,” SAE Paper 2006-01-1433 (2006). Y-1. B. Yan, “High Strain Rate Behavior of Advanced High-Strength Steels for Automotive Applications,” 2003 Great Designs in Steel, American Iron and Steel Institute (February 19, 2003), www.autosteel.org. Y-2. K. Yoshida, “Handbook of Ease or Difficulty in Press Forming,” Translated by J. Bukacek and edited by S-D Liu (1987).

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 5-4

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Section 5 - References

Version

4.1

Section 6 Appendix

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Section 6 - Appendix Advanced High-Strength Steel (AHSS) Product and Process Application Guidelines A Special Edition of In-Depth AHSS Case Studies

Whereas WorldAutoSteel members have worked to identify new material grades and application fundamentals for stamping and joining processes, there has been a complementary effort ongoing by the Auto/Steel Partnership (A/SP). The AHSS Applications Guidelines Group of A/SP has coordinated the completion of several in-depth case studies of Advanced High Strength Steel stampings for automotive structural components and has provided summaries of those studies and lessons learned. These are shown here, and WorldAutoSteel recognizes and appreciates this contribution. Further information from the A/SP may be obtained at http://www.a-sp.org. As additional case studies and complementary materials become available, information will be added to this appendix.

Advanced High-Strength Steel Case Studies/Summaries # 1 Reinforcement Center Pillar Outer....................................................................................................6-2 # 2 Reinforcement Center Body Pillar...................................................................................................6-18 # 3 Panel Rear Rail................................................................................................................................6-34 # 4 Plate-Underbody Side Rail...............................................................................................................6-54 # 5 A-Pillar Front Upper..........................................................................................................................6-78 # 6 Reinforcement A-Pillar Rear Upper.................................................................................................6-102 # 7 Reinforcement Center Pillar Outer Upper.......................................................................................6-124 # 8 Reinforcement Mid-Rail Upper (Right/Left).....................................................................................6-136 # 9 Reinforcement A-Pillar Upper (Right/Left).......................................................................................6-148 #10 Member Floor Side Inner.................................................................................................................6-166

Online at www.worldautosteel.org

Page 6-1

ADVANCED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL APPLICATION GUIDELINES

Revised: 08 Jun 2009

Version

4.1

Case Study Summary #1 Material/Grade : DP340/590 Part Name REINF-CENTER/PLR OTR Thickness: 2.0mm HD 60G60GU www.a-sp.org/publications.htm Coating : URL for Full Case Study: Spring-back/Twist Countermeasures: Development compensation / Binder restraint/Tighten radii in second form die. Manufacturing Process Draw Pierce/Cam trim Trim/Cam Trim Cam Prc./Trim Cam Lance No. of Dies- 5

Diagrams / Illustrations

Part Geometry Product radii 3 x thickness min.

2 mm flange length max, and no flange allowable in corners of rectangular holes

FLD

Sidewalls should be designed with open angles to facilitate overbending for springback compensation.

Elevation transition to latch plate surface must be subtle.

Metal take-ups reduces loose metal and help hold shape

Notes

Die construction considerations Binder tonnage requirements to set bead are 2 -3 times higher than mild steel

Coating form steels is required to prevent gaulling

Draw as much shape as possible in first form station

Draw radii requirement 10 mm Cam trim when angle exceeds 10°

Bottom all form die pads Coin radii to reduce spring-back Tool compensation should be finalized with die trimmed panel

Section Information Dimensional radii requirements for draw station

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 2 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-2

AHSS Appendix - Page 6-3

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 3 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-4

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 4 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-5

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 5 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-6

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 6 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-7

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 7 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-8

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 8 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-9

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 9 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-10

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 10 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-11

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 11 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-12

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 12 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-13

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 13 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-14

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 14 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-15

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 15 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-16

AHSS Appendix - Page 6-17

Case Study Summary #2 Material/Grade : DP 340/590 Part Name Reinf. - Center Body Pillar Thickness: 1.65 mm HD 60G60G www.a-sp.org/publications.htm Coating : URL for Full Case Study: Spring-back/Twist Countermeasures: Draw bars and overcrown and twist compensationin draw die. Darts in restrike die. Manufacturing Process Draw die Trim & Pierce Tr.Prc.& Cam Prc Form Trim & Restrike No. of Dies- 4

Diagrams / Illustrations

Part Geometry

Formability Study Beads help to control springback. Abrupt shape changes cause splits and buckled metal.

Acute angles tend to cause splits.

Deep corners cause distortions on the adjacent surface.

Added darts to reduce springback.

Die Construction Considerations Computed Springback 4 mm down

Draw bars added for length of line equalization

Wrinkles and splits indicarted

Splits indicated

Product Design Notes Equalize length of line and depth of draw as much as possible in all cross sections. Design channel sidewalls at least 6° open for DP590 springback Abrupt surface transitions will cause splits and/or buckles. Avoid acute corner angles and flanged holes. 3 x metal thickness is the minimum part radius for DP 590.

Die Construction and Tryout Information 7mm dn. Added depressions to reduce wrinkled surface

8mm up Twist

Add compensation for springback, twist and camber to the first draw or form die as indicated by the forming simulation study. Recheck to a die trimmed panel. Form as much of the finish shape as possible in the first die. If possible, the first draw die should have its own press slide. Binder pressures must be increased in proportion to material strength. Die construction must be more robust. 5 x T is the minimum die radius for DP 590. Minimumize all trim & prc. angles. No acute angle trimming. Bottom all form die pads. Coin all flange break radii. Upgrade materials for draw beads, trim and flange steels. Design for higher thrust at flange steels. Tryout Part tolerance expansions must be considered. Functional build of sub-assemblies is a practical method of working with tolerance expansions.

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 16 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-18

AHSS Appendix - Page 6-19

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 17 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-20

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 18 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-21

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 19 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-22

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 20 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-23

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 21 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-24

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 22 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-25

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 23 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-26

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 24 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-27

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 25 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-28

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 26 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-29

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 27 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-30

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 28 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-31

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 29 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-32

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 30 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-33

Case Study Summary #3 Part Name Panel - Rear Rail HD Galvanneal 40A40A Coating : Spring-back/Twist Countermeasures: No. of Dies-

Dbl. Act. Draw

Material/Grade : DP 350/600 Thickness 1.95 mm URL for Full Case Study: www.a-sp.org/publications.htm Cam Re-Strike Die added to correct springback and sidewall curl. ( 15° down angle) Manufacturing Process

Trim and Pierce

Cam Re-Strike

Prc. Cam Prc.

Diagrams / Illustrations

Part Geometry

Prc. Cam Prc. and Flg.

FLD

Surface transitions must be less abrupt for DP 600 to avoid buckles and splits.

Sidewalls should be designed with open angles to allow overbend for springback. DP 600 requires 6° overbend minimum. Sidewall areas of metal compression may require more than 6° overbend.

FLD Failures Map Green = Failure Blue = Safe FLD Zero = 39.46%

Product Design Notes

Die Process Considerations

Concessions needed to solve springback and forming issues: Hat section radius larger. Angle of beads at rear changed to suit draw die set-up. Sidewall springback tolerance was expanded.

DP 600 springback as compared to HSLA. Product wall design is 3° open.

75°

Die Construction and Tryout Information Draw die compensation should be finalized to a die trimmed panel. A dbl.action press was used due to high binder pressure requirement Draw die required an internal pressure pad to control buckles. Bottom all form die pads. Coin sidewall and weld flange radii to reduce springback. Provide a robust die construction. Upgrade all trim steels and tool steels subject to abrasive wear. Trim as close to 90° to the surface as possible. Expand tolerances where possible. Use fuctional build approach for tolerance expansion.

88°

DP 600

84°

94°

HSLA

15°

Product design required addition of a cam restrike die.

15°

Cam Restrike Die - Cam Angles

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 31 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-34

AHSS Appendix - Page 6-35

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 32 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-36

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 33 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-37

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 34 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-38

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 35 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-39

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 36 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-40

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 37 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-41

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 38 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-42

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 39 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-43

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 40 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-44

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 41 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-45

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 42 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-46

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 43 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-47

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 44 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-48

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 45 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-49

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 46 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-50

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 47 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-51

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 48 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-52

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 49 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-53

Case Study Summary #4 Material/Grade : DP 420/780 Part Name Plate-Underbody Side Rail Thickness: Coating : URL for Full Case Study: Uncoated www.a-sp.org/publications.htm Spring-back/Twist Countermeasures: Draw, Flg. & Restrike Dies cut with compensation for springback & twist. Manufacturing Process No. of Dies- 5 Dbl. Draw Trim & Pierce Form & Trim Pierce & Trim Restrike & Separate

1.50 mm

Diagrams / Illustrations

Part Geometry

93°

L. H. stamping required 3 relief notches.

FLD

R.H. stamping required 2 relief notches.

116°

Stretch flanges tend to split

Die construction considerations

Product Design Notes Stretch flange conditions will require relief notches. DP 780 is more sensitive to stretch flange edge splits.

Section Information Splits indicated

Do not reform work hardened areas.

Wrinkles indicated

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 50 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-54

AHSS Appendix - Page 6-55

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 51 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-56

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 52 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-57

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 53 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-58

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 54 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-59

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 55 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-60

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 56 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-61

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 57 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-62

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 58 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-63

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 59 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-64

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 60 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-65

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 61 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-66

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 62 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-67

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 63 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-68

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 64 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-69

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 65 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-70

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 66 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-71

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 67 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-72

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 68 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-73

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 69 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-74

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 70 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-75

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 71 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-76

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 72 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-77

Case Study Summary #5

s Material/Grade : DP 350/600 Part Name A Pillar Front Upper Thickness: 1.70 mm Coating : URL for Full Case Study: www.a-sp.org/publications.htm HD Galvanneal 40A40A Spring-back/Twist Countermeasures: Cut draw die with compensation for twist and springback. Check to die trimmed panel Manufacturing Process No. of Dies- 5 Dbl. Draw Trim & Prc,Cam Prc. Cam Trim & Prc. Re-Strike Cam Prc& Separate Diagrams / Illustrations

Part Geometry

Formability Study

Original one-piece design Reinforcement

A Pillar Rr Upr A Pillar Frt. Upr.

Revised three-piece design Re-Strike Final Thickness Plot

Die Construction Considerations Free from net

Product Design Notes Complex stampings may need to be divided for DP 600. Modify abrupt surface transitions to avoid splits and metal thinning. Maintain length of line and depth of draw as much as possible.

Touch net

Die Construction and Tryout Information Draw die compensation should be finalized to a die trimmed panel. Draw / form as much shape as possible in the first die operation. Provide a robust die construction. Bottom all form die pads. Trim as close to 90° to the surface as possible. Avoid acute angle trimming to reduce trim steel chipping. Upgrade all tool steels subject to abrasive wear.

Stamping tends to develop twist. Requires draw die compensation. Free State Springback Plot 50 N

25 N

250 N

Stamping requires varied restraint forces.

300 N

325 N

125 N

Draw Bead Layout

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 73 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-78

AHSS Appendix - Page 6-79

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 74 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-80

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 75 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-81

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 76 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-82

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 77 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-83

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 78 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-84

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 79 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-85

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 80 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-86

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 81 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-87

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 82 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-88

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 83 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-89

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 84 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-90

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 85 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-91

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 86 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-92

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 87 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-93

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 88 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-94

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 89 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-95

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 90 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-96

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 91 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-97

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 92 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-98

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 93 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-99

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 94 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-100

AHSS Appendix - Page 6-101

Case Study Summary #6 Material/Grade : DP 350/600 Part Name Reinf. - A Pillar Rear Upper Thickness: 1.70 mm Coating : URL for Full Case Study: HD Galvanneal 40A40A www.a-sp.org/publications.htm Spring-back/Twist Countermeasures: Cut draw die with adjustment for sprgbk. Adjust binder pressure & re-strike tonnage. Manufacturing Process No. of Dies- 5 Double Draw Trim, Prc.,Cam Prc. Cam Trim & Prc. Cam Pierce Re-Strike & Separate

Diagrams / Illustrations

Part Geometry

Formability Study

Original one-piece design

A Pillar Rear Upper

Reinforcement

A Pillar Front Upper Revised three-piece design

Double Drawn Stamping

Product Design Notes

Die Construction Considerations

Original 1-pc. design split up for DP 600 stamping requirements. 3 x metal thickness minimum radii for this material. Radii increased in depressions. Sidewall ribs helped control springback.

Die Construction and Tryout Information Draw die compensation should be finalized to a die trimmed panel. Avoid trimming more than 10° from square to surface. Upgrade all tool steels subject to abrasive wear. Bottom all form die pads. Provide a robust die construction.

Springback Plot Orange 325 N

Dk Blue150 N

Blue 300 N Green 200 N

Stamping requires varied restraint forces.

Draw Bead Layout

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 95 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-102

AHSS Appendix - Page 6-103

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 96 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-104

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 97 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-105

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 98 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-106

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 99 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-107

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 100 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-108

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 101 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-109

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 102 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-110

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 103 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-111

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 104 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-112

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 105 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-113

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 106 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-114

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 107 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-115

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 108 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-116

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 109 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-117

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 110 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-118

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 111 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-119

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 112 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-120

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 113 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-121

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 114 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-122

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 115 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-123

Case Study Summary #7 Material/Grade : DP 550/980 Part Name Reinf.- Ctr. Pillar Otr. Upr. Thickness: 1.5mm Coating : URL for Full Case Study: www.a-sp.org/publications.htm Uncoated Spring-back/Twist Countermeasures: Overbend, overcrown and added depressions in areas of metal compression. Manufacturing Process No. of Dies 1 Prog. Die

Diagrams / Illustrations

Part Geometry

Forming Simulation

Depressions accepted by product design to correct springback problems.

Progression layout - 13 stages

Parts formed R&L Dbl. in a Progressive Die.

Die construction considerations Inconsistant springback due to metal compression.



Product Design Notes DP 980 does not compress well. Metal take up depressions should be added when compression exceeds 3%. 3T I/S of metal minimum bend radius required for DP 980.

Die Construction and Tryout Information 14°



Overcrown at top of part will affect springback of side flange.

Waves caused by compressed metal on flange Overcrown affected flange springback.

Radius fracture due to small 1T bend radius. 3T required.

Provide 15° open wall angle in die setup to allow for springback compensation in the flange die. Flange steels must be coated. Vanadium Carbide process. No thermal issues with die running 40 SPM with mill oil lube. Avoid placing trim by-pass notches in stretch areas of flange. Robust die sections required with heels and keys for thrust. Trim square to metal surface wherever possible.

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 116 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-124

AHSS Appendix - Page 6-125

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 117 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-126

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 118 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-127

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 119 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-128

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 120 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-129

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 121 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-130

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 122 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-131

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 123 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-132

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 124 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-133

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 125 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-134

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 126 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-135

Case Study Summary #8 Part Name Reinf.- Mid-Rail Upper - R&L Coating : HD 60G60GU Spring-back/Twist Countermeasures: No. of Dies- 1

Prog. Die

Material/Grade : DP 420/780 Thickness: URL for Full Case Study: www.a-sp.org/publications.htm Re-cut die for longitudinal twist compensation. Manufacturing Process

(11) stations

1.2 mm.

40 spm

Part Geometry

Diagrams / Illustrations

Deformation Map

BlueUniaxial compression

Added cutouts to reduce buckled metal.

RedBiaxial stretch forming OthersUniaxial tension Soften radii in depressions.

Die construction considerations Upper Pad - 18 tons Pad Travel - 41mm.

Notes Die had several re-cuts to compensate for twist in finished part. 40 SPM production rate required in-die stacking accumulator. No heat buildup issues. Stamping changes shape after trimming. Excessive wear and chipped edges on trim steels.

Die Construction and Tryout Information Forming of sidewalls before center depressions may not be the optimum forming mode for this type of part. Stamper now feels that center depressions should be formed before sidewalls.

Lower Pad - 118 tons Pad Travel - 15 mm.

Recommendations for future designs Remove cutouts and add offsets to flanges

Note: Sidewalls are formed before center depressions. Upper pad collapsed first.

Add metal thickness offsets on surface Upgrade die materials for all trim steels. Compensation for stamping twist on die punch.

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 127 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-136

AHSS Appendix - Page 6-137

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 128 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-138

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 129 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-139

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 130 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-140

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 131 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-141

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 132 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-142

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 133 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-143

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 134 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-144

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 135 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-145

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 136 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-146

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 137 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-147

Case Study Summary #9 Material/Grade : (see illustration) Part Name Reinf.- A-Pillar Upr.- R & L Thickness: Coating : URL for Full Case Study: www.a-sp.org/publications.htm HD Galvanneal 40A40A Spring-back/Twist Countermeasures: Increased draw binder pressure and tonnage in restrike die. Manufacturing Process No. of Dies- 5 Draw Tr., Prc., Cam Prc. Cam Trim & Prc. Restrike Cam Prc. Part Geometry

Diagrams / Illustrations

2.0 mm

Forming Simulation

DP 350/600 29 forming simulations all predicted splitting of DP 600 material. A tailorwelded blank became the solution to meet formability requirements.

HSLA 350

Die construction considerations A tailor welded blank (HSLA 350/DP 600 MPa) is used to meet formability requirements.

Notes Draw die required 2 re-cuts for springback compensation. Chipped trim steels require excessive maintenance. Upgrade die materials in future for trim steels & scrap cutters. PM intervals - 50,000 hits. Trim dies - after every run. Minor dimensional variation run to run. Stable within run.

Springback Information Springback

Approximate weld line of Tailored Blank. Nominal

Springback simulation

Trimmed stamping sprung 15mm off punch in initial tryout.

Die adjustments during production to solve problems: - Draw die gage and nitro pressure adjustments. - Amount of draw compound. - Adjust tonnage in restrike die.

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 138 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-148

AHSS Appendix - Page 6-149

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 139 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-150

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 140 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-151

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 141 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-152

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 142 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-153

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 143 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-154

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 144 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-155

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 145 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-156

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 146 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-157

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 147 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-158

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 148 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-159

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 149 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-160

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 150 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-161

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 151 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-162

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 152 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-163

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 153 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-164

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 154 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-165

Case Study Summary #10 Material/Grade : DP 350/600 Part Name Member - Floor Side Inner Thickness: Coating : URL for Full Case Study: HD 60G60G www.a-sp.org/publications.htm Spring-back/Twist Countermeasures: Cut Draw Die to nominal, Re-cut to results of springback study. Manufacturing Process No. of Dies- 4 Draw Die Tr. & Prc. Die Tr. Prc& Cam Prc. Form & Restrike Die Part Geometry

Diagrams / Illustrations

1.8 mm

FLD

Mating surfaces shown in yellow. This stamping was made with a doubleaction draw press which provides optimum binder pressure and control for thicker gauge AHSS stampings.

LS-Dyna Simulation - these results were used to proceed with die construction.

Mating panels: floor pans,cowl side, body side, center pillar, quarter inner, inner brackets and cross members.

Die construction considerations

Notes Due to springback, twist and sidewall curl an additional four cuts were required to bring the part to design intent. Provide a more robust die constrruction for thicker gauge AHSS stampings to avoid cracked tooling. Caldie™ inserts used on trim die lower post. (bar stock) Carmo™ steel used for trim die upper sections. (cast steel)

Section Information as designed

split metal

Split eliminated by shortening the blank and revising the radii and force of the step beads.

as revised Revise steep sections to avoid splits.

enlarge radii where possible from 35mm to 48mm

Larger radii reduce split problems and tool wear.

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 155 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-166

AHSS Appendix - Page 6-167

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 156 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-168

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 157 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-169

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 158 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-170

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 159 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-171

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 160 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-172

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 161 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-173

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 162 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-174

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 163 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-175

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 164 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-176

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 165 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-177

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 166 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-178

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 167 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-179

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 168 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-180

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 169 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-181

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 170 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-182

Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications - Design and Stamping Process Guidelines | www.a-sp.org | Page 171 AHSS Appendix - Page 6-183