Utrecht Office Market Profile - Q2 2011


[PDF]Utrecht Office Market Profile - Q2 2011 - Rackcdn.comc1344961.r61.cf3.rackcdn.com/JLL_Utrecht_Office_Market_Profile_Q2_2011.pdfCachedFigure 4: Pr...

2 downloads 139 Views 354KB Size

Utrecht Office Market Profile - Q2 2011

Ä Ä

* % Change for Prime Rents and Capital Values calculated using local currency

000s sqm 400

Market Overview

300

Supply increased slightly in Q2 and, following the reduction in Q1, the new vacancy rate of 13.3% was more in tune with 2010 levels.

200

Prime rents decreased by 2.2% in Q1 to €220 per sq m. This was led by a decrease in the Maliebaan area whereas rents were broadly stable elsewhere. The only other exception was the Papendorp district where the 70/30 ratio of office/alternative use has made it difficult to attract occupiers and there are plans to develop a second office park on the other side of the road which represents a further downside risk to this area. Rents here fell by €10 per sq m over the quarter. In the investment market around€21m was traded in the second quarter giving a total for H1 of €71m. Like the rest of the Netherlands the expectations for prime yields going forward are stable, with the next move potentially upwards given recent increases in ECB interest rates.

15 10 5

100 0 2000

0

Vacancy Total

Vacancy Rate

Figure 3: Rent (EUR) Prime Rent (psm pa)

Annual Rental Growth*

250

20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10

200 150 100 50 0 2000

There has been an increase in the amount under construction. The majority of this is already prelet and is focussed on the City Centre. There are plans for more starts, which would add some more leasing risk to the market especially as occupiers relocate leaving second hand space behind.

Vacancy Rate %

Rental Grow th

Prime Rent

Figure 4: Prime Yields Prime Yield (%) 7.5 6.5 5.5 4.5 Q1 96 Q1 97 Q1 98 Q1 99 Q1 00 Q1 01 Q1 02 Q1 03 Q1 04 Q1 05 Q1 06 Q1 07 Q1 08 Q1 09 Q1 10

Only around 14,000 sq m was let in Q2 bringing the total for the first half of the year to 39 million sq m, a slight improvement on H1 2010. Expectations for 2011 are subdued with few significant occupational requirements of any scale and no growth sector emerging.

H1'11

Figure 2: Vacancy

Prime Yield Source all Charts: Jones Lang LaSalle

10 Yr Av e

Q2 11

-35 bps

2010

0 bps

10y r Av erage

Q2'11

5.70

Take Up

Q2'11

3.8 %

2009

-2.2 %

2008

€ 3,860

12 Month Outlook

2010

Prime Yield %

Change* Q-o-Q Y-o-Y

0

2010

Capital Value (psm)

Q2 11

50

2009

16.4 %

2009

52.2 %

2007

134

2008

U/C (000s sq m)

100

2008

-2.2 %

2006

-2.2 %

2007

€ 220

2007

Prime Rent (psm)

150

2005

20 bps

2006

90 bps

2006

13.3

2004

Vacancy Rate (%)

200

2005

3%

Å Ä Ä Ä Æ

2004

7.1 %

2005

330

2004

Vacancy (000s sqm)

2003

55.6 %

2003

-43.9 %

2003

14

000s sqm 250

2002

Take-up (000s sqm)

Figure 1: Take-up

2002

Outlook

2002

Y-o-Y

2001

Q-o-Q

2001

Q2 11

2001

Summary Statistics

12 Month

2000

Change*

20 Yr Av e

Number Place/District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Utrecht Centre Utrecht Maliebaan Utrecht Rijnsweerd / Uithof Utrecht Lunetten / Stadion Utrecht Kanaleneiland Utrecht Overvecht Utrecht Lage Weide / Cartesiusweg Utrecht Papendorp Utrecht de Wetering Utrecht Leidsche Rijn Centre

Bordering Municipalities 11 Nieuwegein 12 Maarssen 13 Houten

Jones Lang LaSalle Contacts Jaap van Geloven Head of Office Agency – Utrecht Utrecht +31 6-50671088 jaap.v an-gelov [email protected]

Eric de Clercq Zubli Head of Capital Markets Amsterdam +31 20 540 7883 [email protected]

Ruben Langbroek Head of Research Amsterdam +31 20 540 7831 [email protected]

Utrecht Office Market Profile – Q2 2011 Pulse reports from Jones Lang LaSalle are frequent updates on real estate market dynamics. www.joneslanglasalle.eu

COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2011. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent of Jones Lang LaSalle. It is based on material that we believe to be reliable. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure its accuracy, we cannot offer any warranty that it contains no factual errors. We would like to be told of any such errors in order to correct them.