Valuation of Wind Forecasts in Energy Marketing


[PDF]Valuation of Wind Forecasts in Energy Marketing - Rackcdn.com5980c1917cb02508ad8a-145c0cd6e0bc8080df9d3865f16d59d7.r67.cf1.rackcdn.com/...

7 downloads 184 Views 1MB Size

Valuation of Wind Forecasts in Energy Marketing

Craig Collier, DNV GL Evan Caron, Trailstone Energy Group Mark Smith, DNV GL

1

DNV GL © 2013

SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

Agenda

• Traditional evaluation metrics • A “market-value” metric • Brief demonstration

2

DNV GL © 2013

How do we measure perfomance? Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE)

where

𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 =

1 𝑁𝑁 ∑ 𝑁𝑁 𝑖𝑖=1

(𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 − 𝐴𝐴𝑖𝑖 ) x 100

𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 =

1 𝑁𝑁 ∑𝑖𝑖=1 𝑁𝑁

𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 − 𝐴𝐴𝑖𝑖

𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 ≝ 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 𝑖𝑖

𝐴𝐴𝑖𝑖 ≝ "𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 𝑖𝑖

Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)

error for increasing forecast horizon.

Mean Absolute Error

shows shows increasing

x 100

18%

MAPE(%(% of Capacity) of wind farm capacity)

Typically, SoA forecast

20%

2

𝑁𝑁 ≝ 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠

16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0%

1

3

DNV GL © 2013

6

12

18

24

30

Forecast Horizon (Hours) Forecast Horizon (hours)

36

42

48

Bulk measures are intuitive, and often informative

Actual

𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 = 8% 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 = 10%

Forecast 1 Daily MAPE Daily RMSE 4

DNV GL © 2013

Forecast 1

Forecast 2

𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 = 10% 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 = 13%

Forecast 2 Daily MAPE Daily RMSE

All forecasts are not created equal! Wind forecast errors from 7 providers

Forecast 1 5

DNV GL © 2013

2

3

4

5

6

7

Rank forecasts based on traditional metrics MAPE, RMSE

Error Distribution

12

13

13

14

14

7

14

16

15

16

17

6

15

15

14

15

14

5

15

15

14

14

15

4

14

15

14

14

16

3

16

13

16

14

14

2

12

13

13

12

10

1

a large contribution



MAPE, RMSE scores would indicate Solutions 1 & 7 are are highest quality forecasts.



Error distributions strongly favor Forecast 1 for least bias and all but 2 for least error diversity.

6

DNV GL © 2013

Wind is valuable if there is demand! Wind Forecasting

Load Forecasting

Actual 7

DNV GL © 2013

Forecast

Daily MAPE

Daily RMSE

What is the value?

Supply= Demand

8

DNV GL © 2013

What is the value?

9

DNV GL © 2013

DA not always a good predictor of RT Marginal Price = sum of marginal fuel cost, variable maintenance cost, transmission constraints, transmission losses Jan

Jan - May

Feb

Distributions are not the same

RT Price 10

DNV GL © 2013

DA Price



DA: Too few extremes, low & high



DA-RT differences  market opportunities

DA-RT excursions closely track wind ramps Jan

Load Forecast Error(%) Wind Generation (Norm.)

11



In terms of value (revenue), wind forecast error is relatively more important when |DA-RT| large, and when load forecast error (|FLAL|) is small.



Need a metric that weights wind forecast error by a market value factor.

DNV GL © 2013

Applying a market value factor Original measure for MAPE given as

𝑆𝑆𝑖𝑖 = 𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 − 𝐴𝐴𝑖𝑖

Introduce a new measure for all times (i =1, ..., N) as follows

Si =

RTi − DAi 1 N

1 N ∑ j =1 RT j − DA j N ⋅ Fi − Ai FLi − ALi



N j =1

FL j − AL j

FL − AL RTi − DAi Si = ⋅ Fi − Ai RT − DA FLi − ALi

S i = β ⋅ Fi − Ai 12

DNV GL © 2013

RT ≝ 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 ($)

DA ≝ 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 − 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 ($)

FL ≝ 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 − 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 (𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘) AL ≝ 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙(𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘)

Seasonal dependence of value? ERCOT

13

DNV GL © 2013

Market value weights coincide with DA-RT excursions Jan

Feb

Load Forecast Error

RT Price

DA Price DA Wind Forecast

14

DNV GL © 2013

Wind (Norm.)

*

Upper 10% MV

Market value weights coincide with DA-RT excursions Jan

Load Forecast Error

RT Price

DA Price DA Wind Forecast

15

DNV GL © 2013

Wind (Norm.)

* Upper 10% MV

Market value weights coincide with DA-RT excursions

Load Forecast Error

RT Price

DA Price DA Wind Forecast

16

DNV GL © 2013

Wind (Norm.)

* Upper 10% MV

Market value weights coincide with DA-RT excursions

Load Forecast Error

RT Price

DA Price DA Wind Forecast

17

DNV GL © 2013

Wind (Norm.)

* Upper 10% MV

The tale of two metrics

18

DNV GL © 2013

The tale of two metrics

19

DNV GL © 2013

Forecast Solution

Frequency of Minimum nMAPE

Frequency of Minimum nβ-MAPE

1

9

4

2

1

1

3

0

3

4

1

0

5

0

0

6

0

0

7

4

7

(C)Limatology

0

0

Simulation and Application Which forecast creates most value? Scenario: Buy / sell 100 MWh of energy in DA & RT markets for 15 months •

Sell energy in the DA market (go short)  collect revenue at DA price



Buy energy in DA market (go long)  sell in RT market



If forecast under-predicts  sell at RT market for less (opportunity cost)



If forecast over-predicts  buy difference at RT market price

Assumptions: •

Static bidding strategy



All market data available publicly from ERCOT: http://ercot.com/mktinfo/



Seven unique wind power forecasts from DNV GL



Unexpected and planned outages excluded



Prices derived from the West Hub node of ERCOT

20

DNV GL © 2013

Relative Forecast Value

• Application of Forecast 7 yielded 5% greater earnings ($135,000) for high DA-RT days, relative to “next best” earner (Forecast 2). • Forecast 7 yielded 15% greater earnings than the average earnings. • Earnings from a climatology forecast 35% lower than average earnings with a SOA forecast. 21

DNV GL © 2013

Key Takeaways



Bulk forecast quality metrics not always best for any individual application.



Maintain close dialogue with forecast users - optimize a solution around individual needs 



including performance maintenance.

Energy market provides excellent example for innovating approaches to ensure a forecast is right when it matters.

22

DNV GL © 2013

Thank You

Craig Collier [email protected] (858) 836-3370 x 118

www.dnvgl.com

SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

23

DNV GL © 2013